/
Brief Summary of LPA MD Brief Summary of LPA MD

Brief Summary of LPA MD - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
390 views
Uploaded On 2017-03-31

Brief Summary of LPA MD - PPT Presentation

on 19 June 2012 Jose Abelleira Xavier Buffat Chandra Bhat Karel Cornelis Riccardo De Maria Stephane Fartoukh Rossano Giachino Eva Barbara Holzer Mike Lamont Themis Mastoridis Alick ID: 532044

collisions bunch buffat collision bunch collisions collision buffat pieloni lhcb lpa spectrometer luminosity bhat beam strength nsecrelative intensity ip1

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Brief Summary of LPA MD" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Brief Summary of LPA MD on 19 June 2012

Jose Abelleira, Xavier Buffat, Chandra Bhat,

Karel

Cornelis

, Riccardo De Maria,

Stephane

Fartoukh

, Rossano Giachino, Eva Barbara Holzer, Mike Lamont, Themis Mastoridis, Alick

Mcpherson

,

Kazuhito

O

hmi

, Giulia Papotti, Tatiana

Pieloni

,

Ferdico

Roncarolo

,

Ghislain

Roy, Belen Salvachua, Daniel Valuch, Frank Zimmermann, …Slide2

started 3.5 hours late (LHC RF crowbar repair, PS 10–MHz cavity),

then 1 h machine set

up; first MD beam injected ~13:45Special hypercycle for Piwinski MD2 bunches of 1.5 e11 per bunch (+pilot), go to collision tunes, & collapsed crossing angles at IP1 and 5, and separation at IP 1,5, and 8; then looked for collisions. Filling scheme with one bunch colliding in IP1,5,and 8, and other bunch colliding in IP 8 only.Impossible to find collisions at ATLAS and CMS, but LHCb could be optimized... decision to dump & re-inject with higher intensity2 bunches of ~2.4e11 injected without separation bump, IP1/IP5 crossing angle at zero, and collision tunes Clear luminosity signals in ATLAS and LHCb No clear Luminosity readings from CMS (some signal towards the end of the MD) ; problem with BSRT data acquisition  LHCb spectrometer ramped down in steps to zero.LHCb spectrometer was left at 0 strength after the MD

MD historySlide3

LPA MD conditions

2.4e11 / bunch; 2 bunches per beam

1st bunch collides in IP 8 only2nd bunch collides in IPs 1, 5 and 8injection energy, 1.5 ns bunch length, e~2 mm ADT off, orbit feedback off, TCTs at coarse settings, IR angle bumps zeroed in IPs 1 and 5 IP8 crossing angle 4 mrad, 2 mrad, 0 (varied with spectrometer strength)collision tunesestimated Piwinski angles ~ 1.1, 0.6, 0largest Piwinski angle ever!Slide4

LPA MD overview

CMS

lumi signal appears at lastATLASlumi signalreduced(steeringeffect)LHCb luminosity signal zero in the databaseSlide5

o

nly short quiet period (30 s?)

at 50% spectrometer strengthLPA MD overview with IP correctorsX. Buffat, T. PieloniSlide6

LPA MD

b

unch intensitiesX. Buffat, T. PieloniSlide7

LPA MD bunch intensities

X.

Buffat100%50%~15%100%50%~15%

bunch with 3 collisions loses much more intensity;

steepest loss at 50% of

LHCb

spectrometer strength;

best lifetime at 0 strength

Jose Abelleira, Chandra Bhat, Xavier

Buffat

,

Karel

Cornelis

,

Riccardo De Maria, Rossano

Giachino,

Mike Lamont, Themis

Mastoridis, Alick

Mcpherson

, Giulia Papotti, Tatiana

Pieloni

,

Ghislain

Roy,

Belen Salvachua, Daniel

Valuch, Frank Zimmermann, + …

q

ualitatively consistent with expectationSlide8

MD simulation by K.

Ohmi

1 day2 hSlide9

EmitX

beam 1

EmitX beam 2EmitY beam 1EmitY beam 217:001.95+/-0.01 mm(1 collision)2.07+/-0.01 mm(3 collisions)2.17+/-0.00 mm(1 collision)2.56+/-0.02 mm(3 collisions)17:172.7+/-0.1 mm(1 collision)2.10+/-0.03 mm(3 collisions)2.0+/-0.1 mm(1 collision)

1.6+/-0.1

m

m

(3

collisions)

2.17+/-0.01

m

m

(1 collision)

1.72+/-0.03

m

m

(3

collisions)

2.11+/-0.01

m

m

(1 collision)

1.64+/-0.01

m

m

(3

collisions)

17:35

2.53+/-0.01

m

m

(1 collision)

2.0+/-0.1

m

m

(3

collisions)

2.01+/-0.01

m

m

(1 collision)

1.56+/-0.02

m

m

(3 collisions)2.11+/-0.04 mm(1 collision)1.67+/-0.02 mm(3 collisions)2.07+/-0.05 mm(1 collision)1.53+/-0.08 mm(3 collisions)

LPA MD bunch emittance

bunch with 3 collisions shrinksSlide10

BBQ

X. Buffat, T.

PieloniSlide11

BBQ Almost fully saturated

X. Buffat, T.

PieloniSlide12

BSRTs

Got stuck on single bunch the one colliding in IP1-5-8…

No apparent reasons for this…X. Buffat, T. PieloniBSRT software had got stuck!?Slide13

R. De Maria

bunch lengthSlide14

Profile MeasurementsApproximate locations

C. BhatSlide15

Bunch 1

Traces:

Bunch Intensity= 2.4E11ppb(2nd Injection)= 0.43 nsec (Gaussian)FWHM=1.00 nsecRelative Area=0.32= 0.45 nsec (Gaussian)FWHM=1.07 nsecRelative Area=0.28Start of the MDEnd of the MDC. BhatSlide16

Bunch 2 Traces:Bunch Intensity= 2.4E11ppb

(2

nd Injection)= 0.42 nsec (Gaussian)FWHM=0.98 nsecRelative Area=0.22= 0.44 nsec (Gaussian)FWHM=1.05 nsecRelative Area=0.14Start of the MDEnd of the MDC. BhatSlide17

plan

r

eview luminosity data from LHCb and CMS (not in logging database)further analysis intensity and luminosity lifetime for different spectrometer strengthsMD note soon – editor Jose Abelleira