PPT-FINDING THE LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION

Douglas Walton CRRAR Coimbra March 24 2011 Need for Logic of Argumentation The field of argumentation studies needs to be based on some model of logical reasoning Although deductive and inductive models of reasoning are useful in some instances there is a growing consensus that there also needs to be some third alternative standard of correct reasoning to evaluate the strength or weakness of an everyday conversational argument . Please do not alter or modify contents All rights reserved 1FQMFXIFFMMZVDDFGVMJNQMFNFUJHUIJLJMM hy does my child always have an attitude Shes often disruptive disrespectful or picking on other children Shes always the one with a chip on her shoulder Please do not alter or modify contents All rights reserved For more information call 8003384065 or visit wwwloveandlogiccom Love and Logic Institute Inc is located at 2207 Jackson Street Golden CO 80401 57513 1998 Jim Fay 57375e Delayed or Anticipat Please do not alter or modify contents All rights reserved QVSIBTFE 1BJOMTT1BSOUJOHSUI1STDIMBST BDLTPU PMEF XXXMPWF E MPHDDPN 57513 2001 Jim Fay End the Bedtime Blues Parents Dont Need to Force Kids to Go to Sleep edtime is a time of frustration Logical Fallacies. Cognitive Bias. Confirmation Bias. Bandwagon Effect. Wishful Thinking. Framing Bias. Clustering Illusion. Gambler’s Fallacy. Halo Effect. Illusory Superiority. Self-Serving Bias. First Steps towards. an Identification Procedure. November 10, 2010. Douglas Walton Distinguished Research Fellow . CRRAR. Helping Informal Logic Students. It would be helpful to have a more systematic procedure that can be used to help students of informal logic identify arguments of the kind they encounter in natural language texts.. Middle & High . School Science. Victor . Sampson. Assistant . Professor of Science . Education . School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach. Florida State University. Patrick . Enderle. Assistant in Research. The mechanics of taking a firm stand aiming to persuade an audience. Arguments are Everywhere. Making an argument = expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence.. This is often the most important task of academic writing. Often, this is also an unstated expectation.. http://. phil.elte.hu/mate/logtort1/logtort1.html. András Máté. http://phil.elte.hu/mate. /. Department of Logic, ELTE. https://www.facebook.com/elte.logic/?. fref=ts. . Where and when does this (hi)story begin?. Social Context. Iyad Rahwan. Introduction. Argument takes place in a social context. Arguing with oneself vs. arguing with others. New challenges:. How does the audience evaluate arguments?. How do arguers strategize?. Everyday Perspective. Interpersonal conflict=2 people engaged in verbal hostility. How do I win these arguments?. Debate=verbal competition. Collaboration=working out disagreements constructively. Cooperative knowledge seeking. Analyze. To methodically . examine . in . detail the . composition or . structure of . something. , . (especially information or evidence), for . purposes of explanation and interpretation.. The detective was asked to analyze the evidence for the case.. to Argumentation Mining in Natural Language Text. Topic 2. 4/14/2014. Huy V. Nguyen. 1. Outline. Introduction to argumentation. Argumentation mining the problem. Argumentation v. discourse. Annotation and corpora. ARGUMENTATION METHODS OF ARGUMENT RECONSTRUCTION Douglas Walton CRRAR FMAR, Konstanz, Sept. 21, 2012 Argumentation Schemes The current problem with trying to evaluate plausible reasoning using systems of weights with numerical values is that there can be many ways of doing this. p1003. (. Clinical . Reminders). Updates . and New . Reminders. IHS Office . of Information Technology. EHR . Program. Office Hour Presenters. Updates and New Reminders. 2. CDR Susan Pierce-Richards, ARNP.