PPT-Proving Optimizations Correct

Author : olivia-moreira | Published Date : 2018-09-21

using Parameterized Program Equivalence University of California San Diego Sudipta Kundu Zachary Tatlock Sorin Lerner Compiler Correctness Difficult to develop

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Proving Optimizations Correct" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Proving Optimizations Correct: Transcript

using Parameterized Program Equivalence University of California San Diego Sudipta Kundu Zachary Tatlock Sorin Lerner Compiler Correctness Difficult to develop reliable compilers large complex programs. The algorithm is an improved version of the bakery algorithm It is specified and proved correct without being decomposed into indivisible atomic operations This allows two different implementations for a conventional nondistributed system Moreover t Jeff Craven, Marcia Cronce, and Steve Davis. NOAA/NWS Milwaukee-Sullivan WI. 7. th. GOES Users’ Conference (GUC. ) Oct 20. th. 2011. 2010 CIMSS MKX GOES-R Proving Ground. May to August 2010. 27 CIMSS GRPG shifts scheduled (. Bruce Worthington. Software Development Manager. Microsoft Corporation. Key Takeaways. Be a leader in advancing 64-bit computing. Adopt best practices and new tools. Let’s partner on new hardware directions. or . Incorrect. See if the vocabulary words are used correctly in the following sentences. . ?. Mary was the sweetest gal, always smiling and seeking ways to help others. She was quite . condescending. Yongsub. Lim. Applied Algorithm Laboratory. KAIST. Definition. A class is . PAC learnable . by a hypothesis class if. there is an algorithm such that. over . THE PROVING OF NEPTUNIUM MURIATICUM THE PROVING OF NEPTUNIUM MURIATICUM \n \r \n !"#$%&'(() THE P in . Dyninst. Andrew . Bernat. , Matthew Legendre. Instrumentation is Complicated. User perspective: . “Insert some new code here, here, and here.”. Dyninst’s. perspective:. Relocation. – Move code to make space for instrumentation. By Namita Dave. Overview. What are compiler optimizations?. Challenges with optimizations. Current Solutions. Machine learning techniques. Structure of Adaptive compilers. Introduction. O. ptimization . Tyler Patton. Discussion:. Background. Sequential Optimizations. Parallelization of chess. Backgroun. d. : What is Chess?. Strategic 2 player game. 64 tiles. 16 pieces per player. Objective to capture the. Balazs Voneki. CERN/EP/LHCb Online group. TIPP2017, Beijing. 23.05.2017. LHCb Upgrade. Early results of RDMA optimizations on top of 100 Gbps . Ethernet, TIPP2017, Beijing, 23.05.2017 . – Balazs Voneki. x. .. 1. 2.. 3. 4.. February 6, 2017. Geometry . 8.2 Proving Triangle Similarity by . AA. 1. 8.2 Warmup. Find the indicated measure in . . JKLM. .. 1.. . ML . . . 2. .. MJ . 3. .. JN . Ross Tate. Michael Stepp. Sorin Lerner. University of California, San Diego. Optimizing by Hand. Original. for (i = 0; i < 50; i ). . for (j = 0; j < 50; j ). . img[i*50 j] = f(i, j);. T. Chen, T. Moreau, Z. Jiang, L. Zheng, S. Jiao, E. Yan, H. Shen, M. Cowan, L. Wang, Y. Hu, L. . Ceze. , C. . Guestrin. , and A. Krishnamurthy . Presentation by Grzegorz . and High-Coverage Tests. Presented by Yoni Leibowitz. EXE & KLEE. Automatically Generating Inputs of Death. David Dill. Vijay . Ganesh. Cristian Cadar. Dawson Engler. Peter Pawlowski. KLEE. EXE. Unassisted & Automatic Generation of High-Coverage Tests for Complex System Programs.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Proving Optimizations Correct"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.