/
Unmet Need: Is it the right indicator for FP programming wi Unmet Need: Is it the right indicator for FP programming wi

Unmet Need: Is it the right indicator for FP programming wi - PowerPoint Presentation

pamella-moone
pamella-moone . @pamella-moone
Follow
407 views
Uploaded On 2017-01-24

Unmet Need: Is it the right indicator for FP programming wi - PPT Presentation

Aparna Jain PhD MPH Laura Reichenbach PhD ICFP 2015 January 2016 Background Research questions Are the current measurement approaches of contraceptive need no need unmet need and met need the most appropriate ID: 513417

contraception youth model countries youth contraception countries model married unmet 2012 cote olds status burkina ref unmarried year marital

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Unmet Need: Is it the right indicator fo..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Unmet Need: Is it the right indicator for FP programming with Youth in Ouagadougou partnership countries?

Aparna Jain, PhD, MPHLaura Reichenbach, PhD

ICFP 2015

January 2016Slide2

BackgroundSlide3

Research questions

Are the current measurement approaches of contraceptive need (no need, unmet need, and met need) the most appropriate indicators

for family planning programming among youth aged 15 to 24?

How does age and marital status influence contraceptive need among youth in Ouagadougou partnership countries?Slide4

MethodsSlide5

Data

Demographic and Health SurveysBenin 2011-2012Burkina Faso 2010

Cote D’Ivoire 2011-2012Guinea 2012Mali 2012-2013

Niger 2012

Senegal 2010-2011Slide6

Sample size

Youth 15-24 years old Benin:5,800Burkina

Faso: 6,623Cote D’Ivoire: 3,976

Guinea: 3,661

Mali: 3,736

Niger: 3,822

Senegal: 6,648Slide7

Methods

Outcome variable: Contraceptive needUnmet need

Met needNo need

Explanatory variables: Marital status

Never married

Currently married/in union

Formerly married

Respondent age (15-19, 20-24)

Covariates: education, wealth, parity, residenceSlide8

Methods

Bivariate analysis:Assess effect of marital status & age on contraceptive needMultivariate logistic regression:Model I: no need (1) compared to some need (unmet need + met need, 0)

Model II: unmet need (1) compared to met need (0); respondents with no need excludedSlide9

ResultsSlide10

Need for Contraception by Marital Status

 

NO NEED

UNMET NEED

MET NEED

Benin

Unmarried

72.2

10.9

16.9

Married

56.8

33.9

9.3

Burkina

Faso

Unmarried

84.44.710.8Married 63.323.413.3Cote D’IvoireUnmarried62.616.221.2Married 53.831.015.3GuineaUnmarried76.210.313.5Married70.425.54.1MaliUnmarried84.68.66.8Married66.824.19.1NigerUnmarried98.30.930.74Married71.916.311.8SenegalUnmarried95.82.81.4Married61.330.68.1Slide11

Need for Contraception by Age

 

NO NEED

UNMET NEED

MET NEED

Benin

15-19

73.3

12.3

14.4

20-24

59.0

27.2

13.8

Burkina Faso

15-19

83.8

9.9

6.320-2461.220.618.2Cote D’Ivoire15-1968.116.415.220-2449.627.223.3Guinea15-1979.814.75.520-2464.821.613.6Mali15-1979.714.55.820-2466.422.710.9Niger15-1987.28.44.420-2469.5

16.8

13.7

Senegal

15-19

88.7

9.1

2.220-2473.320.26.5Slide12

MARRIED

(ref: unmarried)

15 –

19 YEAR OLDS

(ref: 20 – 24 year olds)

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Benin

1.07

(0.84-1.37)

1.35

(1.17-1.56)

Burkina Faso

0.65

(0.48-0.89)

1.28

(1.06-1.54)Cote D’Ivoire1.01(0.80-1.26)1.73(1.39-2.15)Guinea1.66(1.27-2.19)1.41(1.13-1.77)Mali0.52(0.33-0.83)1.03(0.83-1.27)Niger0.09(0.04-0.20)1.05(0.82-1.35)Senegal0.16(0.10-0.24)0.76(0.61-0.95)Model I: No Need for ContraceptionModel adjusted for education, wealth, parity, residence Slide13

Model IIa

: Unmet Need for Contraception(excludes those with no need)

MARRIED

(ref: unmarried)

15 –

19 YEAR OLDS

(ref: 20 – 24 year olds)

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Benin

2.27

(1.57-3.27)

0.87

(0.67-1.13)

Burkina Faso

1.76

(1.09-2.87)2.66(1.94-3.66)Cote D’Ivoire2.10(1.43-3.08)1.15(0.80-1.66)Guinea6.92(4.22-11.34)2.64(1.78-3.92)Mali2.64(1.78-3.92)1.26(0.82-1.96)Niger2.37(0.42-13.4)1.25(0.80-1.94)Senegal1.77(1.07-2.92)1.13(0.66-1.92)Model adjusted for education, wealth, parity, residence Slide14

Model IIb

: Met Need for Contraception(excludes those with no need)

UNMARRIED

(ref: unmarried)

OR

95% CI

Benin

2.08

(1.44-3.01)

Burkina Faso

1.66

(1.03-2.67)

Cote D’Ivoire

1.76

(1.21-2.57)

Guinea

5.28

(3.30-8.45)

Mali1.73(0.96-3.10)Niger2.02(0.34-11.97)Senegal1.66(1.01-2.72)Model adjusted for education, wealth, parity, residence Slide15

DiscussionSlide16

Discussion

NO

NEED

UNMET NEED

MET NEED

15

- 19

0.68

0.16

0.16

20

- 24

0.50

0.27

0.23

25 - 29

0.51

0.26

0.2330 - 340.570.220.2135 - 390.560.230.2140 - 440.570.230.1945 - 500.800.110.09Cote D’Ivoire DHS 2011-2012Slide17

Discussion

As youth transition into different life stages, their need and use of contraception changes 6 of 7 countries 15-19

year olds have no need for contraception compared to 20-24 years old (significant in 4 countries)

7 countries unmarried youth who are sexually active are

more likely to use contraception than married

women (significant in 5 countries)

7 countries sexually

active married youth were most likely to have an unmet need

(significant in 6 countries)

Slide18

Discussion

Family planning programming for youth needs to consider:Age

Sexual initiationMarital status

One size does not fit all!Slide19