/
Wave Modeling Local Wave Transformations Wave Modeling Local Wave Transformations

Wave Modeling Local Wave Transformations - PowerPoint Presentation

pamella-moone
pamella-moone . @pamella-moone
Follow
380 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-04

Wave Modeling Local Wave Transformations - PPT Presentation

Billy L Edge amp Margery Overton CVEN 69502 Bathymetric Data Why do we need wave models Wave climate assessment at the project site is important to most coastal amp ocean engineering projects including ID: 713078

models wave diffraction refraction wave models refraction diffraction reflection shoaling current wind model breaking scale bouss interaction nonlinear data

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Wave Modeling Local Wave Transformations" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Wave Modeling

Local Wave Transformations

Billy L.

Edge & Margery Overton

CVEN 695-02Slide2

Bathymetric

DataSlide3

Why do we need wave models?

Wave climate assessment at the project site is important to most coastal & ocean engineering projects, including

- navigation and channel studies

- on/offloading of ships

- optimization of harbor layouts

- design of structures (breakwaters, etc.)

shoreline erosion projects, etc.

Nearshore

wave conditions are normally determined from deepwater conditions

- long-term

nearshore

wave data are usually unavailable

- transform offshore wave data to

nearshore

(wind-generation, shoaling,

refraction, breaking, dissipation, bottom friction) –

regional scale models

- investigate local scale phenomena (refraction, wave reflection, diffraction,

nonlinear wave-wave and wave-current interaction) –

local scale modelsSlide4

Regional Scale Wave Modeling

Scale O(100 km~5000 km)

Spectral wind-wave models (WAM)

Scale

O(10 km ~100 km)

Spectral wind-wave models (STWAVE and SWAN)

Dominant process: wind input, shoaling and refraction

Wave action: conservation equation

Assume phase-averaged wave properties vary slowly over distances of the order of a wavelength

Cannot

accurately resolve rapid variations that occur at sub-wavelength scale due to wave reflection/diffraction Slide5

Local Scale Wave Modeling

Scale O(1 km ~ 10 km)

Elliptic mild-slope model (CGWAVE)

Parabolic mild-slope model (REFDIF)

Boussinesq wave model (BOUSS-2D)

Dominant processes: shoaling, refraction, breaking, reflection, diffraction, wave nonlinearities due to interactions of different frequencies and ambient currents and structures

All models use vertically integrated eqns for wave propagation in 2D horizontal plane

CGWAVE assumes hyperbolic cosine variation of the velocity potential over depth, and BOUSS-2D assumes a quadratic variationSlide6
Slide7

Summary of Model Features

Phase resolving

Phase averaging

Phase averaging

Diffraction/Reflection

Nonlinear Interactions

Wave-Current Interaction

Wave Breaking

Shoaling/Refraction

BOUSS

CGWAVE/

REFDIF

STWAVESlide8

Spectral Wind-Wave Models

Advantages

wind-wave generation

shoaling, refraction, breaking

wave-current interaction

applicable to large domains (deep to shallow water)

Disadvantages

reflection, diffraction

steady-stateSlide9

Elliptic Mild-Slope Models

Advantages

well suited for long-period oscillations

shoaling, refraction, breaking, bottom friction

reflection, diffraction

wave-current interaction (in future version)

flexibility of finite elements

Disadvantages

nonlinear interactions in shallow water (in future version)Slide10

Parabolic Mild-Slope Models

Advantages

shoaling, refraction, breaking, bottom friction

Refraction, reflection, diffraction

wave-current interaction

Disadvantages

Grid limitations in size and regular griddingSlide11

Boussinesq Wave Models

Advantages

shoaling, refraction, breaking, bottom friction

reflection, diffraction, nonlinear interactions

wave-induced currents, wave-current interaction

Disadvantages

computationally intensive

2-D very computationally intensiveSlide12

Applicability

STWAVE:

ideal for wave propagation in open water

SWAN:

time dependent, larger domain

Mild-Slope:

ideal for long-period oscillations in harbors (CGWAVE)

suited for strong diffraction & reflection

more flexibility with finite element method(CGWAVE)

rapid solutions(REFDIF)

BOUSS-2D:

ideal for wave transformation near entrance channels and harbors

nonlinear interactions in shallow water

wave-induced currents near structures and

surfzoneSlide13

Engineering

Practice - 1

CORPS

wave models have good physics to provide reliable estimates to projects

Integrated with tools (

SMS,etc

.)

Used in support of a variety of research and engineering studies

Have strengths & weaknesses – no one model can do it all!

Validated with field/lab data & checked against analytical solutions

MIKE21

wave models …

DELFT3D

wave models …Slide14

Wind forcing

Current forcing

Wave-current

Regional modeling

Deepwater wave transformation up to pre-breaking depths

Finite difference

Spectral, steady state

Quick to run

Good front end

STWAVE computed wave Heights

STWAVESlide15

CGWAVE

Diffraction

Reflection

Refraction

Breaking

Bottom friction

Entrance losses

Finite element mesh

Spectral sea state

Wave-current Interaction (in testing)

Wave-wave Interaction (in testing)

No wind Input

CGWAVE Sea state for Morro Bay, CASlide16

BOUSS-2D

Time-dependent

Open coast, harbor and surf zone waves

Shoaling, refraction, reflection, diffraction,

dissipation and run-up

Finite difference

Random spectral sea state modeling

Wave-induced currents

Nonlinear waves, sub- and super-harmonics

BOUSS-2D Simulation for Everglades projectSlide17

Engineering Practice

-2

Modeling

waves in navigation channels/inlets is most challenging -- need reliable lab & field data to check complex physics of models

WIS data suitable for open-coast, but may be transformed and used in navigation projects

Use STWAVE or SWAN to transform deepwater wind/wave climate to

nearshore

(10 to 30 m) depth contour Slide18

Engineering Practice

-3

Have to use models if no nearshore field data available

Using models that are in common practice and have acceptance in the engineering community is preferred to one of a kind models

Project-specific problems must determine the type of model for a study

Detailed model documentation is necessarySlide19
Slide20

Grays Harbor, WashingtonSlide21

Grays Harbor, WashingtonSlide22
Slide23

Entrained SandSlide24

Local Wave KinematicsSlide25

Regions of

Application of Wave ModelsSlide26

Solitary/Cnoidal

WavesSlide27

Wave Prediction (Deep Water)Slide28

Combined Refraction and Shoaling

(Dean and Dalrymple)Slide29

Wave DecaySlide30
Slide31

Random Waves

Analysis Methods

Eye

ZUC

ZDC

SpectralSlide32

Random Wave Spectra

JONSWAPSlide33

Wave Spectra

TMA

Pierson Moskowitz

Other

JONSWAPSlide34

Mild Slope Equation

http://www.coastal.udel.edu/refdif/img20.htmSlide35

CONCLUSIONS

BOUSS-2D is a powerful nonlinear model for estimating waves in shallow and intermediate water depths where wave diffraction and nonlinearities are important

Model is ready for project applications

SMS interface of BOUSS-2D

MAKE THINGS AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE BUT NO SIMPLER!!! – “Albert Einstein”Slide36

REFDIF