Presentation on theme: "Ex ante-evaluation of"— Presentation transcript
Slide1
Ex ante-evaluation of Bulgaria-the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme 2014-2020
Joint Working Group, Sofia 21/08/2014Slide2
Ex-ante evaluation’s main phases and deliverables
2
May 2014
Beginning
of
June
2014
End of June
2014
End of July2014
May 2014Slide3
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)’s main phases and deliverables
3
May 2014
Beginning
of
June
2014
June
2014
July2014
May 2014Slide4
Ex-ante evaluation as an iterative process
4
Ex-ante Evaluator
Tight cooperation
with programming authorities
Timely feedbacks to fit cognitive needs
Judgments and recommendations Slide5
Lessons learnt from 2007-2013 programming:Strategy
is backed by a sound and well-grounded socio-economic analysisClear demarcation between spheres of interventions and between Priority axes to be ensured
A border region tourism strategy which outlines destinations and services for tourism developmentSoft measures and investments are well balanced Horizontal principles
duly considered programming and will be developed during OP’s life-cycle
More tailored and accountable indicators
, including methods for baseline and target values, also broken down
i
n categories where possibleDesigning the Bulgaria-the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme
2014-20205Involvement of stakeholders:Develop strategies and propose actions adhering to cross-border needs and demandsStrengthening a sense of collective ownership of Community PoliciesParticipatory pathway enabling a wide participation of cross-border stakeholders (Main steps: on-line surveys, Regional Consultative Forum, on-line consultations on Draft OP (versions 1.0 and 2.0)Stakeholders informed about outcomes and tackling methodsOn-line instruments and periodic events during Programme implementationSlide6
Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Programme strategy 1/2
6Slide7
Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Programme strategy 2/2
7Slide8
Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Horizontal principles
8
Programming phase
Horizontal principles duly taken into consideration in preparatory works and
Participatory pathway
Dialogue with the Ex ante Evaluator
Programme
implementation
Horizontal principles will be taken into account in the quality assessment for project
selection
Monitor horizontal principles at programme and project levelBreakdown indicators (where possible)Slide9
Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Financial allocation
9
Financial
weighting took into account lessons learned and needs assessment
Financial allocation seems to be coherent, balanced and appropriate
Financial breakdown per
Priority is consistent with identified challenges and needsSlide10
Ex-ante evaluation main findings: Indicators, monitoring and evaluation 1/2
Baseline and target valueProgramme
specific result indicators’ baseline values established where possible on past experience and budget, others to be established through ad hoc surveysOutput indicators’ target values have been established paying attention to envisaged activities, past experience and budget allocationNeed for further clarification on
methods for calculating
targets
Definition of
Strategic Projects
(and related requirements, scope and budget) essential for fine tuning the targets
IndicatorsThe choice of foreseeing one Result Indicator (RI) for each expected result is sharable, though they must prove not to be overambitiousThe S.M.A.R.T. analysis proved result and output indicators’ suitability to monitor and verify Programme’s achievements. Nonetheless, some rooms10Slide11
Collection of data and evaluation
The arrangements for the management and control system are explained in detail and are well structured, with a delimitation between institutional and procedural
partsMore detailed/clearer criteria still need to be identified for selecting Strategic Projects
Administrative
capacity
The
functions and responsibilities
of the bodies in charge of the management system are in line with the regulatory framework and well describedThe indicative list of members of the JMC identify which are the institutions and organizations which will take part in the work of this body, though it must be completedThese adjustments should lead to the simplification of the JMCThe Programme may involve advisory bodies in the work of the JMCEx-ante evaluation main findings: Indicators, monitoring and evaluation 2/2
11Slide12
Ex-ante Evaluation’s main recommendations on Draft Final OP (version 3.2 – August 2014)
12
Procedural improvement
Clarify
synergies between SOs related to competitiveness during the implementation
Describe
functions
of JTS so
as to enable its simplification
Programme
strategyIndicators, monitoring and evaluation
Administrative capacity
Lessons learnt from 2007-2013
Using project forms to monitor implementation & cross cutting issuesSlide13
MethodologyIterative process with programming team and cooperation with Ex-ante Evaluator
Literary review of EC guidance documents and reports
on the application of the SEA Directive as well as national specific legislation, manuals and guidelines developed by Bulgaria and TurkeyAnalysis on Draft OP
Objectives
Assessing
possible impacts
on the environment of the Bulgaria-Turkey IPA CBC
Programme
2014-2020 (Directive 2001/42/EC and national legislation), taking into account cross-border nature of proposed interventionProviding a qualitative description on the positive and possible negative effects on the environment at SO levelDrawing recommendations to prevent and reduce and as fully as possible any significant adverse effects
during the implementation the ProgrammeStrategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)13
Main steps
Scoping Report
Consultations
on Scoping Report (June 2014)
Draft Environmental Report
Consultations
of the Draft of the Environmental Report (underway)
SEA (to be annexed to OP)Slide14
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
Vincenzo Angrisani
angrisani@lattanziogroup.eu
Virgilio Buscemi
buscemi@lattanziogroup.eu
Francesca
Solca
solca@lattanziogroup.eu
Federico Benvenuti
benvenuti@lattanziogroup.euSlide15
