PPT-Ex ante-evaluation of

Bulgariathe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme 20142020 Joint Working Group Sofia 21082014 Exante evaluations main phases and deliverables 2 May 2014 Beginning . Introduction Ex ante and ex post analysis has been propounded in th e thirties by Gunnar Myrdal who introduced it in this way an important distinction exists betw een prospective and retrospective methods of calculating economic quantitie s such a 1KaplowandShavell(2002)distinguishbetween\welfare"(ex-ante)and\fairness"(ex-post).Summers(1992)distinguishesbetween\goalreasons"(ex-ante)and\rightnessreasons"(ex-post).2Seeforinstancetheclassicreferen Bulgaria-the . former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia IPA CBC Programme 2014-2020. Joint Working Group, Sofia 21/08/2014. Ex-ante evaluation’s main phases and deliverables. 2. May 2014. Beginning. . www.dotbu.org. .). LTO Evaluation Process. LTO position must be at . least four (4) months long. .. Principals should meet with the OT prior to the evaluation . to provide an overview of the process and areas of consideration, i.e. classroom management, assessment and evaluation, planning, etc.. Wider evaluation is anything that is relevant to both the . AO1 . and the question being asked that is not your initial . IDA . point, evidence and grounding of it or AO3. .. How important is wider evaluation. Learning objectives. By the end of this presentation, you will be able to:. Explain evaluation design . Describe . the differences between types of evaluation . designs. Identify . the key . elements . Laying the Groundwork Before Your First Evaluation Diana Epstein, Ph.D, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation Learning objectives Understand five critical activities for your first grant cycle Brammell. , and Abby . Neuer. Biblioism. Major Gods and Goddesses. Fictoria’s. Court. Rowlina. Bill. Wellington. Ric. Flare. Zuzu. Carl. Dash. Suzy. Lutson. Verde. Nofio’s. Court. Francis. Douick. , . tuae. . pia. . cura. . puellae. ,.     quod mea . nunc. . vexat. corpora . fessa. . calor. ?. A, ego non . aliter. . tristes. . evincere. . morbos.     . optarim. , quam . te. . . demittit. [. ab. alto],. ut. . terrae. , . utque. . novae. . pateant. . Karthaginis. . arces. [. hospitio. ] . Teucris. , ne . fati. . nescia. Dido. [. finibus. ] . arceret. : . volat. . a a aa l/ 24 a fel a aPost 3 a 1 IV2 1 2 2 3 a a 2 a a a aAnte filed a a a a filedAnte a a a a a a a a a Ante afirm a a firmfirms l a a firm files firm firm a firm a firm firms a firm a a firm filth a finds a a a finds finds a a Provided finds finds a a a a a find filed a findingProvided a a a finds filing -Ante filed filing finds a fixed finds first filingaA filefiling filing final a f 77 I Pro- 7vided aProvided further Provided further fiscal fiscal a a a a a Ante a a flood a a flood a a a aAnte Pro a a fiscalfiscal f a Provided N a field fingerprintfication - a Pro Provid Factors. . Evaluation by the . designer. . Every time the designer makes a key design decision or completes a design milestone, then chosen and competing alternatives should be evaluated using the analysis techniques..