Baires Category theorem Definition Let X be a metric space A subset M of X is said to be RareNowhere Dense in X if its closure M has no interior points Meagerof First Category in X if M is the union of ID: 465065
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Functional Analysis" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Functional AnalysisSlide2
Baire’s
Category theoremSlide3
Definition
Let X be a metric space. A subset M of X is said to be
Rare(Nowhere Dense) in X if its closure M has no interior points,
Meager(of First Category) in X if M is the union of countably many sets each of which is rare in X,Nonmeager(of Second category) in X if M is not meager in X.Slide4
Statement:
If a metric space X≠
ф
is complete, it is nonmeager in itself.Proof: Suppose ф≠X is a complete metric space such that X is meager in itself. Then
X=
k Mk with each Mk rare in X. Now M1 is rare in X, so that, by definition, M1 does not contain a nonempty open set. But X does(as X is open). This implies M1≠X. Hence M1C=X-M1 of M1 is not empty and open. Slide5
We may thus choose a point p
1
in M
1C and an open ball about it, say, B1=B(p1;ε1)
M
1
C ε1<½By assumption, M2 is rare in X, so that M2 does not contain a nonempty open set. Hence it does not contain the open ball B(p1; ½ ε1). This implies that M2C B(p1; ½ ε1) is non empty and open, so that we may choose an open ball in this set, say, B2
=B(p2;ε2)
M2C B(p
1; ½ ε1)
ε2<½ ε1
By induction we thus obtain a sequence of balls
Bk=B(pk;εk) εk<2-kSuch that Bk Mk= ф and Bk+1 B(pk; ½ εk) Bk k=1,2,… Slide6
Since
ε
k
<2-k, the sequence (pk) of the centers is Cauchy and converges, say, pk pX
because X is complete by assumption. Also, for every m and n>m we have
B
nB(pm; ½ εm), so that d(pm,p)d(pm,pn)+d(pn,p) <
½ εm +d(p
n,p) ½ ε
m As n . Hence pBm
for every m. Since BmM
m
C ,we now see that pMm for every m, so that pMm=X. this contradicts pX. Hence X in not meager i.e. X is nonmeager in itself.Slide7
Uniform
Boundedness
TheoremSlide8
Statement: Let (
T
n
) be a sequnce of bounded linear operators Tn:X Yfrom a Banach space X into a normed space Y such that (
T
n
x ) is bounded for every xX, then the sequence of norms Tn is bounded. Slide9
Proof: We are given that the sequence (
T
n
x ) is bounded. For every xX a real number c
x
such that
(1) Tnx cx n=1,2,…For every kN, let AkX be the set of all x such that Tnx k for all n.We claim that A
k is closed.Let xAk
, then there is a sequence (xj) in
Ak converging to x. This means that for every fixed n we have (2)
Tnxj k
Slide10
Taking limit j
in (2)
lim Tnxj k
lim
Tnxj k (since norm is continuous) Tn(lim xj) k (since each Tn is continuous) Tnx kSo xA
k, and Ak is closed.
By (1) and the definition of Ak
we have, each xX belongs to some A
k. Hence X=kA
k
k=1,2,3,…Since X is complete, Baire’s theorem implies that some Ak contain an open ball, say, (3) B0=B(x0;r)Ak0Let xX be arbitrary, not zero. Slide11
We set z=x
0
+
x =r/2 x (4)Then z-x0 <r, so that zB0. By (3) and from the definition
of A
k0
we thus have Tnz k0 for all n. Also Tnx0 k0 since x0B0. From (4) we obtain x=(z-x0)/.This gives for all n Tn
x = Tn(z-x
0) / 2 x ( T
nz + Tnx
0 )/r 2 x (k0
+k
0)/r =(4k0 x )/rHence for all n, Tn = sup x =1 Tnx (4k0)/rHence the sequence of norms Tn is bounded. Slide12
Open Mapping TheoremSlide13
Definition(Open
mapping)
Let X and Y be metric spaces. Then T: D(T)
Y with domain D(T)X is called an open mapping if for every open set in D(T) the image is an open set in YSlide14
Lemma (Open unit ball)
Statement: A bounded linear operator T from a
Banach space X onto a Banach space Y has the property that the image T(B0) of the open unit ball B0=B(0;1)X contains an open ball about 0
YSlide15
Proof: We prove the result in following steps:
The closure of the image of the open ball B
1
=B(0;½) contains an open ball B*. T(Bn
) contains an open ball
V
n about 0Y, where Bn=B(0;2-n). T(B0) contains an open ball about 0Y.Slide16
a. Let A
X we write
A to mean A=xX x= a, aA
A
A
(=2)Slide17
For
w
X by A+w we mean A+w=xXx=a+w
,
aA
AA+w
a
a+wSlide18
We consider the open ball B
1
=B(0;
½)X. Any fixed xX is in kB1 with real k sufficiently large (k>2 x ). Hence X=
k
kB
1 k=1,2,…Since T is surjective and linear,(1) Y=T(X)=T(k kB1)= k kT(B1)= k kT(B1) Now since Y is complete, it is non meager in itself, by Baire’s category theorem. at least one
kT(B1) must contain an open ball.This
implies that T(B1) also contains an open ball, say, B*=B(y
0;) T(B1). It follows that
B*-y0=B(0; ) T(B
1
) –y0. This completes with the proof of (a.) Slide19
b. We prove that B*-y
0
T(B0), where B0 is given in the statement. For this we claim that(3) T(B1) –y0 T(B
0
).
Let yT(B1) –y0. Then y+y0 T(B1).Also we have y0T(B1)sequences un, vn such that un
=Twn T(B1
) such that un y+y0
vn=Tz
n T(B1) such that v
n
y0. Since wn, znB1 and B1 has radius ½, it follows that wn –zn wn + zn < ½+½=1 so wn-znB0,
so T(wn-z
n) =Twn
–Tzn =un
-vn y+y
0
-y
0
=ySlide20
Thus
yT
(B
0). Since yT(B1) –y0 was
arbitrary, this proves (3). So from (2) we have
B*-y
0=B(0;)T(B0) Let Bn=B(0;2-n) X. Also since T is linear, T(Bn)=2-nT(B0)So from (4) we obtain (5) V
n=B(0;/2n) T(B
n)This completes the proof of (b.)
c. We finally prove that V1
=B(0; /2) T(B0)by showing that every yV
1
is in T(B0). So let yV1.From (5) with n=1 we have V1T(B1)Slide21
Hence y
T(B
1
). So by definition vT(B1) such that y-v </4.Now
vT
(B
1) so v=Tx1 for some x1B1.Hence y-Tx1 < /4.From this and (5) with n=2 we get that y-Tx1V2 T(B2). As before there is an x2B2 such that (y-Tx
1)-Tx2 < /8.Hence y-Tx
1-Tx2V
3T(B3), and so on. In the nth
step we can choose an xnB
n
such that (6) y -kTxk < /2n+1 k=1,2,…,n; n=1,2,… Let zn=x1+…+xn. Since xk Bk, we have xk <1/2k. This yields for n>mSlide22
z
n
-zm k=(m+1),…,n x <
k=(m+1),…,
1/2
k 0As m . Hence (zn) is a cauchy sequence in X and X is complete so (zn) is convergent. xXsuch that zn x. Also x = k=1,…, xk k=1,…,
xk
k=1,…, 1/2k=1
So xB0 . Since T is continuous,
Tzn Tx
, and
Tx=y (by (6))Hence yT(B0)Since yV1 was chosen arbitrarily so V1T(B0)This completes the proof of (c.) hence the lemma.Slide23
Statement(Open mapping theorem) (Bounded inverse theorem): A bounded linear operator T from a
Banach
space X onto a
Banach space Y is an open mapping. Hence if T is bijective, T-1 is continuous thus bounded.Slide24
Proof: We prove that for every open set A in X has the image set T(A) open in Y. For this we prove that T(A) is union of open balls and for this we prove that for every y
T(A) there is an open ball about y.
Now let y=TxT(A). Since A is open, therefore it has an open ball with center at x. A-x contains an open ball with center at 0. Let r be the radius of the open ball & k=1/r. Then k(A-x) contains open unit ball B(0;1). Now apply lemma to k(A-x) we get
T(k(A-x))= k(T(A)-
Tx
) contains an open ball about 0 & so does T(A)-Tx.Hence T(A) contains an open ball about Tx=y.Slide25
Since
y
T
(A) was arbitrary, we get T(A) is open. Finally if T is bijective, i.e. T-1 exists then it is continuous as it is proved to be open. Also T is linear and bounded so T-1 is also linear.
Now since T
-1
is continuous and linear hence it is bounded. Hence the proof of the theorem.Slide26
Closed Graph TheoremSlide27
Definition
(Closed linear operator)
Let X and Y be
normed spaces and T: D(T) Y a linear operator with domain D(T)X. Then T is called closed linear operator if its graph G(T)=(
x,y
)
xD(T), y=Txis closed in the normed space XY, where the two algebriac operations of a vector space in XY are defined by (x1,y1)+(x2+y2)=(x1+x2,y1
+y2) (x,y
)=(x,y) ( a scalar)And the norm on XY is defined by
(x,y) = x + y Slide28
Statement (Closed Graph theorem) : Let X & Y be
Banach
spaces and
T: D(T) Y a closed linear operator, where D(T)X. Then if D(T) is cloed in X, the operator T is bounded.Slide29
Proof: Now T: D(T)
Y is a closed linear operator.
by defination G(T)=(x,y)xD(T), y=Tx
is closed in
normed space XY.We show that XY is a Banach space .Let (zn) be a cauchy sequence in XY.zn=(xn,yn). Then for every >0, there is an N s.t. z
n-zm = (x
n,yn) – (
xm,ym)
= (xn-x
m
,yn-ym) = xn-xm + yn-ym < m,n >NHence (xn) & (yn) are cauchy sequences in X & Y respectively.Also X & Y are complete.Slide30
xX
&
yY s.t. xn x & y
n
y.
zn=(xn,yn) (x,y)=z(say)Taking limit m in (1) we get limm zn-zm = zn – limm z
m = zn – z <
n > NSince (zn
) was arbitrary cauchy sequence in XY & z
nz we get XY is complete hence a Banach space.
Now since T is closed
G(T) is closed in XY & also D(T) is closed in XY. Hence G(T) & D(T) are complete.Now consider the map P: G(T) D(T) defined by P(x,Tx)=xSlide31
Let (x
1
,Tx
1), (x2,Tx2) G(T) and , be scalarsthen P((x1,Tx
1
)+(x
2,Tx2))=P((x1, Tx1)+ (x2,Tx2)) =P((x1,T(x1))+(x2, Tx2)) =P(x1+x
2, T(x1)+T(x
2)) =P(x1+x
2, T(x1+x
2)) = x1+x
2
= P(x1,Tx1)+P(x2,Tx2) P is linear.Now P(x,Tx) = x x + Tx = (x,Tx)P is bounded.Now clearly by definition P is bijective.P-1 exists & P-1: D(T) G(T) is given by P-1(x) =(
x,Tx)Slide32
Since G(T) & D(T) are complete we apply open mapping theorem, we say that P
-1
is bounded
i.e. a real number b>0 s.t. P-1x b x x D(T) (
x,Tx
) b x x D(T)
So we have Tx Tx + x = (x,Tx) b x x XT is bounded. Hence the proof.Slide33
TEST
Do any two.
State & prove
Baire’s
category theorem.
State & prove Uniform
boundedness theorem.State & prove Open mapping theorem.State & prove Closed graph theorem.