Working Together Across Differences Presenters Dr Cori Wong amp Dr Kaye Holman Activity outline Working Together across Difference Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice ID: 655685
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "PCDI Retreat – Summer 2017" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
PCDI Retreat – Summer 2017
Working Together Across Differences
Presenters:
Dr. Cori Wong
& Dr. Kaye HolmanSlide2
Activity outline
Working Together across Difference: Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice
b
y Uma Narayan
Working
Together
Context and Framing
Small Group Reflection and Share OutSlide3
Working together on the PCDI
Accountability
Vulnerability
Trust
ResponsibilitySlide4
Context and framing
It is often difficult to sustain
dialogue
for functional working relationships among diverse groups,
even if members share common goals
.
“[C]
oalitions
can breakdown for internal reasons
if 1) people do not learn to trust one another across divisive social differences, and if 2) people do not learn how to sustain working relationships in contexts of sometimes powerful distrust and disagreement” (33). Slide5
Context and framing
“A progressive organization…cannot be sustained
unless the prejudices and problems which arise between members are examined and programmatically addressed
” (33).
It may help to talk about how dialogue between people who do not share the experience of a certain form of oppression can be undermined,
especially when members of oppressed groups are harmed and “unintentionally violated by non-members of the oppressed group who participate in the dialogue
” (31). Slide6
Working together
“Working
together continuously across our differences
is not a
project we cannot avoid or get away from. We are condemned to either ignoring or annihilating our
differences
or to working tenuously across them to form always
risky bonds of
understanding”
(34
).
Trust
must be
built
, but we must also
recognize
“historically
constituted relations of power, privilege and
lack of understanding
on the part of members of advantaged groups, and
reasonable grounds for mistrust
on the part of members of disadvantaged
groups” (35).Slide7
Epistemic Privilege (of Insiders)
[M]embers of an oppressed group
[
insiders] have a more immediate, subtle, and critical knowledge about the nature of their oppression
than people who are non-members of the oppressed group [outsiders]” (35).
“[I]
mmediate
knowledge of everyday life under oppression”
– how oppression is experienced, inflicted, and “the ways in which oppression affects their social and psychic lives” (36).Slide8
Epistemic Privilege vs Privilege
Epistemic Privilege (Insiders)
Privilege (Outsiders)
Unearned advantages and benefits, as well as access to resources, that help members of non-oppressed groups navigate institutions, systems, life, and the world more easily.
Not just
an asset or benefit
but also,
typically,
a lack of
understanding
,
fluency, knowledge
, and/or
experience
with oppression, as well as a
lack of self-transparency
.Slide9
For Outsiders
Non-members of the oppressed group
will have to work very hard to “develop a more sophisticated understanding
of what a form of oppression involves.”
‘
Outsiders
’ who do not put in the effort to educate themselves, “
who simply have an abstract sort of goodwill towards members of the oppressed group, are unlikely to have much of a clear or detailed awareness of the forms in which that oppression is experienced”
(37). Slide10
How Outsiders Can Cause Harm
“For insiders to work together with outsiders is a project that is often fraught with difficulty, for, in any communication, the
two groups do not function as equally vulnerable
” (40).
“Here,
members of disadvantaged groups render themselves more vulnerable
because they accept the existence of good will on the part of members of the oppressed groups, and they have good reason to expect that they will, often enough, be hurt, good will not withstanding” (35). Slide11
Insiders Incur Harm
“It is the insider who pays the price of oppression and
even sympathetic outsiders
, since they are prone to blind-spots and clumsiness,
can offend and hurt the insider more often than they imagine.
The insider can neither simply walk away from the issues, as the outsider always can, nor can she ever hurt the outsider in quiet the same way” (40-41). Slide12
Good will is not enough to overcome assumptions & attitudes born out of centuries of Power & Privilege
“Thus
, since the brunt of possible hurt is most often on the insider,
the burden of taking care not to cause offense can fairly be laid on the
outsider
.
“
Outsiders often assume, wrongly, that good will on their part is a guarantee against causing offense to insiders
” and are surprised when insiders express their hurt since outsiders “cannot understand how someone sympathetic to a form of oppression could conceivably ben seen as having offensive views or attitudes” (41). Slide13
Harmful Misses & Failures of Outsiders
What
the outsider misses that the insider
grasps (39-40):
Minimizing the emotional costs of
oppression
Missing the subtler manifestations of
oppression
Not making connections or failing to see oppression in new contextsSlide14
Harmful Misses & Failures of Outsiders
Failures
of outsiders that reveal a lack of understanding and cause harm to
insiders:
Overt Denial of the Validity of the Insider’s Understanding and/or
Response
(41)
Accusations
of
Paranoia
(42)
Insensitive
Reactions to an Insider’s
Response
(43)Slide15
Harmful Misses & Failures of Outsiders
Failures
of outsiders that reveal a lack of understanding and cause harm to
insiders (continued):
Failure to Avoid Crude and ‘Stereotypic’ Generalizations about Insiders
(44)
Failure to See Why Something That is Not Explicitly Insulting to a Person or Group may be Implicitly
So
(44)
Inappropriate
Judgments
About What Insiders Ought to Do or
Feel
(45)Slide16
Small Groups
Minimizing
the emotional costs of
oppression (39)
Missing
the subtler manifestations of
oppression
(39)
Not
making connections or failing to see oppression in new
contexts (40)
Overt
denial of the validity of the insider understanding and/or
response (41)
Accusations
of
paranoia (42)
Insensitive
reactions to an
insider’s response (43)
Crude
and stereotypic generalizations about
insiders (44)
Inability
to differentiate explicit and implicit
insults (44)
Inappropriate
judgements about insider actions or
feelings (45)
Choose one Miss or Failure of Outsiders. Review the article’s section and discuss how it has, or might, show up as we work with the Commission and/or PCDI subcommittees? Slide17
Outsider commitment
Develop
sophisticated understanding of oppression
(37).
Commit to
educating oneself
(37).
Assume
“methodological humility”
(38, 46)
Assume one is missing something, and hesitate to offer criticism of insiders’ claims until one possesses a fuller understanding of the context.
Exercise
“methodological caution”
(38, 46)
Sincerely attempt to offer any potential criticism of insiders’ perceptions in a way that doesn’t denigrate or dismiss the validity of the insiders’ point of view. Slide18
How Insiders Can Help
Recognize outsiders do not have the subtle understanding of oppression to attempt to “
deal with insensitive perceptions/comments by outsiders with greater charity
”
(46).
Insensitivities are not to be overlooked rather than confronted or dealt with, but “the
manner in which the confrontation takes place may be different
” (46).
The insider could “point out why the outsider’s remarks or perceptions were experienced as hurtful or offensive” (46).Slide19
Questions – Today & Moving Forward Working on the PCDI
How
can we ensure that we are working
across our
differences with trust, vulnerability, accountability, and responsibility
?
How will we commit ourselves to
prevent from causing harm to others?
What would we ask of others if we
do cause
harm?