/
Anomalous transport in Anomalous transport in

Anomalous transport in - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
416 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-08

Anomalous transport in - PPT Presentation

paritybreaking Weyl semimetals Pavel Buividovich Regensburg CRC 634 Concluding Conference Darmstadt 812 June 2015 Weyl semimetals 3D graphene and more Weyl points survive ID: 310504

anomaly weyl fermions chiral weyl anomaly chiral fermions dirac magnetic lattice cme field anomalous transport axial parity semimetals classical

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Anomalous transport in" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Anomalous transport in parity-breaking Weyl semimetals

Pavel Buividovich(Regensburg)CRC 634 Concluding ConferenceDarmstadt, 8-12 June 2015Slide2

Weyl semimetals: “3D graphene” and more

Weyl points survive ChSB!!!Slide3

Simplest model of Weyl semimetalsDirac Hamiltonian with time-reversal/parity-breaking terms

Breaks time-reversal Breaks parity

Well-studied by now:

Fermi arcs, AHE, Berry flux…

A lot of intuition from HEP, only recent experimentsSlide4

Full set of operators for 2x2 hamiltonianPerturbations = just shift of the Weyl point

Weyl point are topologically stable Berry Flux!!!

Only “annihilate” with

Weyl

point of

another chirality

Topological stability of

Weyl

points

Weyl

Hamiltonian in momentum spaceSlide5

Anomalous transport: HydrodynamicsClassical conservation laws for chiral fermionsEnergy and momentum Angular momentumElectric charge No. of

left-handedAxial charge No. of right-handed

Hydrodynamics:

Conservation laws

Constitutive relations

Axial charge violates

parity

New parity-violating

transport coefficientsSlide6

Anomalous transport: CME, CSE, CVEChiral Magnetic Effect[Kharzeev, Warringa

, Fukushima]Chiral Separation Effect[Son, Zhitnitsky]

Chiral

Vortical

Effect

[

Erdmenger

et al.

,

Teryaev

, Banerjee

et al.

]

Flow

vorticity

Origin in

quantum anomaly!!!Slide7

Chiral Magnetic Effect

μA-μA

Excess of right-moving particles

Excess of left-moving anti-particles

Directed current along magnetic field

Not surprising – we’ve broken

parity

Lowest Landau level =

1D

Weyl

fermion

???Slide8

Signatures of CME in cond-matSlide9

Negative magnetoresistivity

Enhancement of electric conductivity

along magnetic field

Intuitive explanation: no backscattering

for 1D

Weyl

fermionsSlide10

Chirality pumping and magnetoresistivity

OR: photons with circular polarizationChiral magnetic wave

Relaxation time

approximation:Slide11

Negative magnetoresistivityExperimental signature of axial anomaly, Bi1-xSb

x , T ~ 4 K Slide12

Negative magnetoresistivity [ArXiv:1412.6543]]Slide13

Negative magnetoresistivity from lattice QCD

NMR

in strongly coupled

confined phase

!!!Slide14

Non-renormalization of CME: hydrodynamical argument

Let’s try to incorporate Quantum Anomaly into Classical Hydrodynamics

Now require positivity of entropy production…

BUT:

anomaly term

can lead to

any sign of

dS

/

dt

!!!

Strong constraints on

parity-violating transport coefficients

[Son,

Surowka

‘ 2009]

Non-

dissipativity

of anomalous transport

[Banerjee,Jensen,Landsteiner’2012]Slide15

CME and axial anomalyExpand current-current correlators

in μA: VVA correlators

in some special kinematics!!!

The only scale is µ

k3 >> µ

!!!

=Slide16

General decomposition of VVA correlator 4 independent form-factors

Only wL is constrained by axial WIs [M. Knecht

et al.

,

hep

-ph/0311100]Slide17

Anomalous correlators vs VVA correlator

CME: p = (0,0,0,k3), q=(0,0,0,-k3), µ=1, ν=2, ρ=0

IR SINGULARITY

Regularization:

p = k +

ε

/2, q = -k+

ε

/2

ε

“momentum” of

chiral

chemical potential

Time-dependent chemical potential:

No ground state!!!Slide18

Anomalous correlators vs VVA correlator

Spatially modulated chiral chemical potentialBy virtue of Bose symmetry, only w

(+)

(k

2

,k

2

,0)

Transverse form-factor

Not fixed by the anomaly

[PB 1312.1843]Slide19

CME and axial anomaly (continued)In addition to anomaly non-renormalization,new (perturbative

!!!) non-renormalization theorems[M. Knecht et al.

, hep-ph

/0311100]

[A.

Vainstein

,

hep-ph

/0212231]

:

Valid only for

massless

fermions

!!Slide20

CME and axial anomaly (continued)Special limit: p

2=q2Six equations for four unknowns… Solution:

Might be subject to

corrections

due to

ChSB

!!!Slide21

CME and inter-fermion interactions

Sources of corrections to CME in WSM: Spontaneous chiral symmetryBreaking

Hydrodynamic/Kinetic arguments invalid with

Goldstones!

First principle check with

Overlap fermions

[

PB,Kochetkov

, in progress]

Radiative

QED

corrections

[

Miransky,Jensen

,

Kovtun,Gursoy

2014-2015]Slide22

Effect of interaction: exact chiral symmetry

Continuum Dirac, cutoff regularization, on-site interactions V

[P. B., 1408.4573]Slide23

Effect of interactions on CME:Wilson-Dirac lattice fermions

Enhancement of CME due to renormalization of

µA

[PB,Puhr,Valgushev,1505.

04582

]Slide24

μA, QA- not “canonical” charge/chemical potential

Electromagnetic instability of μA

[Frö

hlich

2000]

[Ooguri,Oshikawa’12]

[

Akamatsu,Yamamoto’13

] […]

Chiral kinetic theory (see below)

Classical EM field

Linear response theory

Unstable EM field mode

μ

A

=> magnetic helicity

Novel type of “inverse cascade”

[1504.04854]

Instability of chiral plasmasSlide25

Instability of chiral plasmas – simple estimateMaxwell equations + ohmic conductivity + CME

Energy conservationPlain wave solution Dispersion relation

Unstable solutions at

large k !!!Slide26

Real-time simulations:classical statistical field theory approach[Son’93, J. Berges and collaborators]

Full quantum dynamics of fermionsClassical dynamics of electromagnetic fields

Backreaction from fermions onto EM fields

Approximation validity same as kinetic theory

First nontrivial order of expansion in

ђSlide27

Real-time simulations of chirality pumping[P.B., M.Ulybyshev’15]

Wilson-Dirac fermions with zero bare mass as a lattice model of WSMFermi velocity still ~1 (vF << 1 in progress)

Dynamics of

fermions is exact

,

full mode summation

(no stochastic estimators)

Technically:

~ 60 Gb / (16x16x32 lattice), MPI

External magnetic field

from external source (rather than initial conditions )

Anomaly

reproduced up to

~5%

error

Energy conservation up to ~2-5%Slide28

Results from classical statistical field theorySlide29

Results from classical statistical field theorySlide30

Initial quantum fluctuations includedSlide31

Initial quantum fluctuations includedSlide32

Initial quantum fluctuations includedSlide33

ConclusionsParity-breaking WSM: dynamical equilibriumAnomalous transport phenomena: CME

, CVE“Non-dissipative” ground-state transportCME protected by anomaly

Nontrivial corrections

from:

symmetry breaking

radiative

QED corrections

BUT:

quite small for lattice models

Real-time

instability

of parity-breaking WSM

Backreaction

speeds up

chirality

decaySlide34

This work was done withMaksim

UlybyshevMatthias PuhrSemen

ValgushevSlide35

Back-up slidesSlide36

Weyl semimetals: realizationsPyrochlore Iridates

[Wan et al.’2010]Strong SO coupling (f-element)Magnetic orderingStack of TI’s/OI’s[Burkov,Balents’2011]

Surface states of TI Spin splitting

Iridium:

Rarest/strongest elements

Consumption on earth: 3t/year

Tunneling amplitudes

Magnetic doping/TR breaking essentialSlide37

Weyl semimetals with μAHow to split energies of

Weyl nodes?

[

Halasz,Balents

’2012]

Stack of

TI’s/OI’s

Break inversion by

voltage

Or break both

T/P

Electromagnetic

instability

of

μ

A

[Akamatsu,Yamamoto’13]

Chiral kinetic theory (see below)

Classical EM field

Linear response theory

Unstable EM field mode

μ

A

=> magnetic

helicitySlide38

Lattice model of WSMTake simplest model of TIs: Wilson-Dirac fermionsModel magnetic doping/parity breaking terms by local terms in the Hamiltonian

Hypercubic symmetry broken by b

Vacuum energy is decreased for both

b

and

μ

ASlide39

Weyl semimetals: no sign problem!Wilson-Dirac with

chiral chemical potential:No chiral symmetry

No

unique

way

to

introduce

μ

A

Save

as

many

symmetries

as

possible

[Yamamoto‘10]

Counting

Zitterbewegung,not worldline wrappingSlide40

Weyl semimetals+μA : no sign problem!

One flavor of Wilson-Dirac fermions Instantaneous interactions

(relevant for condmat

)

Time-

reversal

invariance

:

no

magnetic

interactions

Kramers

degeneracy

in

spectrum

:

Complex

conjugate

pairs

Paired

real

eigenvalues

External magnetic field causes sign problem!Determinant is

always positive!!!Chiral chemical potential: still T-invariance!!!Simulations possible with Rational HMCSlide41

Weyl points as monopoles in momentum spaceFree

Weyl Hamiltonian:

Unitary matrix of

eigenstates

:

Associated non-Abelian gauge field:Slide42

Weyl points as monopoles in momentum spaceClassical regime: neglect spin flips = off-diagonal terms in a

kClassical action(ap)11

looks like a field of

Abelian monopole in momentum space

Berry flux

Topological invariant!!!

Fermion doubling theorem:

In compact

Brillouin

zone

only pairs of

monopole/anti-monopoleSlide43

Fermi arcs[Wan,Turner,Vishwanath,Savrasov’2010]What are surface states of a Weyl semimetal?

Boundary Brillouin zoneProjection of the Dirac pointkx

),

k

y

(

θ

)

– curve in BBZ

2D Bloch Hamiltonian

Toric

BZ

Chern

-Symons

= total number of

Weyl

points

inside the cylinder

h(

θ

,

k

z

) is a topological

Chern insulator Zero boundary mode at some θSlide44

Why anomalous transport?Collective motion of chiral fermionsHigh-energy physics:Quark-gluon plasmaHadronic

matterLeptons/neutrinos in Early UniverseCondensed matter physics:Weyl semimetalsTopological insulatorsSlide45

Why anomalous transport on the lattice?1) Weyl semimetals/

Top.insulators are crystals2) Lattice is the only practical non-perturbative

regularization of gauge theories

First, let’s consider

axial anomaly

on the latticeSlide46

Dimension of Weyl representation: 1Dimension of Dirac representation: 2Just one

“Pauli matrix” = 1Weyl Hamiltonian in D=1+1 Three Dirac matrices:

Dirac Hamiltonian:

Warm-up: Dirac fermions in D=1+1 Slide47

Warm-up: anomaly in D=1+1 Slide48

Axial anomaly on the latticeAxial anomaly = = non-conservation of Weyl fermion number

BUT: number of states is fixed on the lattice???Slide49

Anomaly on the (1+1)D lattice

DOUBLERS

Even number of

Weyl

points in the BZ

Sum of “

chiralities

” = 0

1D version of

Fermion Doubling

1D minimally

doubled

fermionsSlide50

Anomaly on the (1+1)D latticeLet’s try “real” two-component fermions

Two chiral “Dirac” fermionsAnomaly cancels between doublers

Try to remove the doublers

by additional termsSlide51

Anomaly on the (1+1)D lattice

A)B)C)

D)

A)

B)

D

)

C)

In A) and B):

In C) and D):

B)

Maximal mixing of chirality at BZ boundaries!!!

Now

anomaly comes from the Wilson term

+ All kinds of nasty renormalizations…

(1+1)D Wilson fermionsSlide52

Now, finally, transport: “CME” in D=1+1

μA

-

μ

A

Excess of right-moving particles

Excess of left-moving anti-particles

Directed current

Not surprising – we’ve broken

parity

Effect relevant for nanotubes Slide53

“CME” in D=1+1

Fixed cutoff regularization:

Shift of integration

variable:

ZERO

UV regularization

ambiguitySlide54

Dimensional reduction: 2D axial anomaly

Polarization tensor in 2D: [Chen,hep-th/9902199]

Value at

k

0

=0, k

3

=0

:

NOT DEFINED

(without IR regulator)

First

k

3

0

, then

k

0

0

Otherwise zero

Final answer:

Proper regularization (vector current conserved): Slide55

Excess of right-moving particlesExcess of left-moving particlesDirected axial current, separation of chiralityEffect relevant for nanotubes

“CSE” in D=1+1

μ

A

μ

ASlide56

“AME” or “CVE” for D=1+1 Single (1+1)D Weyl fermion at finite temperature T

Energy flux = momentum density

(1+1)D

Weyl

fermions, thermally excited states:

constant energy flux/momentum densitySlide57

Going to higher dimensions: Landau levels for Weyl fermionsSlide58

Going to higher dimensions: Landau levels for Weyl fermions

Finite volume:

Degeneracy of every level = magnetic flux

Additional operators

[

Wiese,Al-Hasimi

, 0807.0630] Slide59

LLL, the Lowest Landau Level

Lowest Landau level = 1D Weyl fermionSlide60

Anomaly in (3+1)D from (1+1)DParallel uniform electric and magnetic fieldsThe anomaly comes only from LLL

Higher Landau Levels do not

contributeSlide61

Anomaly on (3+1)D lattice Nielsen-Ninomiya picture:Minimally doubled fermions

Two Dirac cones in the Brillouin zoneFor Wilson-Dirac, anomaly again stems from Wilson terms

VALLE

YTRONICSSlide62

Anomalous transport in (3+1)D from (1+1)D CME, Dirac fermions

CSE, Dirac fermions“AME”, Weyl fermions

Slide63

Chiral kinetic theory [Stephanov,Son]

Classical action and

equations of motion with gauge fields

Streaming equations in phase space

More consistent

is the Wigner

formalism

Anomaly = injection of particles at zero

momentum (level crossing)Slide64

CME and CSE in linear response theory

Anomalous current-current correlators: Chiral Separation and Chiral Magnetic Conductivities: Slide65

Chiral symmetry breaking in WSMMean-field free energy

Partition functionFor ChSB (Dirac fermions)

Unitary transformation of

SP Hamiltonian

Vacuum energy and Hubbard action are

not changed

b

= spatially

rotating condensate

= space-dependent

θ

angle

Funny Goldstones!!!Slide66

Electromagnetic response of WSMAnomaly: chiral rotation has nonzero Jacobian in

E and BAdditional term in the actionSpatial shift of Weyl

points:

Anomalous Hall Effect:

Energy shift of

Weyl

points

But:

WHAT HAPPENS IN GROUND STATE (PERIODIC EUCLIDE???)

Chiral magnetic effect

In covariant form Slide67

SummaryGrapheneNice and simple “standard tight-binding model”Many interesting specific questionsField-theoretic questions (almost) solved

Topological insulatorsMany complicated tight-binding modelsReduce to several typical examplesTopological classification and universality of boundary states

Stability w.r.t. interactions? Topological Mott insulators?

Weyl

semimetals

Many complicated tight-binding models,

“physics of dirt”

Simple models capture the essence

Non-dissipative anomalous transport

Exotic boundary states

Topological protection of

Weyl

points