/
Chemical constraints on Theories of Planet Formation Chemical constraints on Theories of Planet Formation

Chemical constraints on Theories of Planet Formation - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
387 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-10

Chemical constraints on Theories of Planet Formation - PPT Presentation

Vincent Geers Institute for Astronomy ETH Zurich Star amp Planet Formation group A Banzatti S Bruderer F Lahuis I Pascucci Th Henning P Ábrahám A Juhász ID: 356258

gas formation ice outburst formation gas outburst ice planet water disks 2008 amp forming hcn lup disk earth c2h2

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chemical constraints on Theories of Plan..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Chemical constraints on Theories of Planet Formation

Vincent GeersInstitute for Astronomy, ETH ZurichStar & Planet Formation group

A. Banzatti, S. Bruderer, F. Lahuis, I. Pascucci, Th. Henning, P. Ábrahám, A. Juhász

M. Meyer, U.

Gorti

, E.

Mamajek

, D.

Hollenbach

, A. BenzSlide2

Outline

EX Lup: molecular emission lines toward variable YSOLimits on timescale ice-giant formation with HerschelSlide3

Different Flavors of Planet FormationSlide4

The carbon problem

Lee, Bergin & Nomura 2010

C under abundant in Earth and meteorites compared to what is available at formation => primordial carbon grains are destroyed, while silicon grains remain intactSlide5

Different Flavors of Planet FormationSlide6

Discontinuities in disks provide observational tests

From M. Meyer, Physics World, November, 2009

Based on

Dullemond

et al. (2001) with artwork from R. Hurt (NASA) Slide7

Chemistry in planet-forming zone

Wide range of molecules now detected in planet-forming zone (0.1-10AU) around few dozen YSOs (H2O, HCN, C2H

2, OH, CO)Concurrent C, N, O in inner disks imply complex chemistry!Pontoppidan et al. 2010Slide8

Gas disk chemistry may vary with stellar mass

Pascucci

et al. (2009)Slide9

EX Lup: temporal domain experiment

EX Lupyoung M star with diskEruptive variable star, on timescale of decades

Recent outburst in January 2008, accretion rate up ~40, luminosity ~4 (Aspin et al. 2010)Spitzer observed it before and during outburstUnique experiment: What happens to the gas and dust content when only 1 parameter, luminosity, is changed?Slide10

Episodic formation of cometary material

Witnessed formation of silicate crystals during outburstPrevious big outburst in 1955 => no trace in 2005 => efficient removal of crystalline silicates from surface

Ábrahám et al. 2009 NatureISM

Pre-outburst

Outburst

Halley/

Tempel

cometsSlide11

Water line variations in disk around EX Lup

H2O features (Banzatti et al. in prep.)

Quiescent phaseMarch 2005Outburst phaseApril 2008Slide12

Results of water modeling

Line ratios suggest larger surface area with constant water abundance in outburstGrid of simple LTE models (NH2O, T, area)best fit outburst : cooler water and

4-5 x larger emitting area than when in quiescenceIce line moving outward during outburst? Modified from Pontoppidan et al. 2010Slide13

C2H2, HCN, OH also change!

OH: undetected in quiescence, detected in outburstphoto-dissociation from H2O ? (Tappe et al. 2008)

compare with predictions for self-shielding by Bethell & Bergin 2010HCN & C2H2: detected in quiescence, not in outburstLine flux ratio HCN/C2H2 in quiescence consistent with solar-type star, cf. Pascucci et al. (2009)

Banzatti

et al. (in prep.)

C

2

H

2

HCN

OH

OH

Quiescent

phase

March 2005

Outburst

phase

April 2008Slide14

What is the timescale for forming ice-giants?

Do young 10-100 Myr stars with debris disk systems have enough gas (> 10 Mearth) to form planets like Uranus and Neptune?

Debris disks assumed gas-poor, but counter-examples exist: 49 Cet, Beta Pic (10-20 Myr)Modest amounts of gas may still significantly influence grain dynamics, thus planetesimals growthSlide15

Herschel is best for limits of ice-giant formation!

[OI] one of the strongest gas emission lines originating from 10-50 AU region (ice-giant planet forming zone) => sensitive probe of remnant gas available to form ice-giants

Based on Gorti & Hollenbach 2008Slide16

Limits on ice-giant formation with Herschel

Search for remnant gas in 10-100 Myr debris disks, with detected planets and/or signs of planet formation:GT program (2.5 hr) : HR 8799, HD 15115

to be scheduled hopefully next window Nov-JanOT program (4.9 hr) : 4 young stars with well-studied dust distributions: HD 61005, HD377, MML17, RXJ1852.3-3700Observations will probe down to 0.01 – 4 Mearth of gas:Non-detections => strong upper limits for formation of ice-giants (M ~ 10 Mearth)Detections => will need follow-up (e.g. CO, [CII]) to determine relative abundances of C, N and O in photo-evaporating disksSlide17

Take home message

EX Lup: molecular emission lines changing dramatically with luminosity during outburst :H2O, OH lines stronger, C2H2

and HCN weakerSimple LTE model of water consistent with cooler water and larger emitting areaHerschel will provide important constraints on timescale for formation of ice-giantsSlide18

Gordon Research Conferences

Origins of Solar SystemsComposition of Forming Planets: A Tool to Understand Processes

July 17-22, 2011Mount Holyoke CollegeSouth Hadley, MA Program available later this fall. Registration open athttp://www.grc.org/or Google “GRC 2011 Origins”Slide19