PPT-MODERATING DELIBERATIVE FORUMS:

AN INTRODUCTION NATIONAL ISSUES FORUMS A nationwide network that promotes deliberation on tough public issues Nonpartisan nonprofit Libraries K12 schools colleges and universities community organizations senior centers and more. and the . PINet. Project. John Gastil. Dept. of Comm. Arts & Sciences. The Pennsylvania State University . February 24, 2013. Articles on Deliberative Democracy. Number of peer-reviewed articles with search terms in record fields. Terms = (Deliberation OR Deliberative) AND (Civic . John Dryzek. (CRICOS) #00212K. Context. (CRICOS) #00212K. Deliberative democracy’s standards: communication should. Be non-coercive. Induce reflection (listening and respect). Connect particular interests to more general principles. A . Topoi. Catalogue of Journalistic Questions That Disrupt Democratic Debate. Jonas . Gabrielsen. , Christina Pontoppidan & Heidi . Jønch. -Clausen. Situating our research question. Dominant focus: In evaluating the (missing) deliberative quality of modern political discourse, we need to understand and . What are the Forums?. The . forums are a new . online platform for . our members to communicate and share information with each other.. The forums will also be used as a central hub for all ADPH events and opportunities for development.. Center for Civic Life at Ashland University. A group of citizens committed to citizen solutions to issues that concern them. . Host deliberative forums for the public. Hold Community Conversations. Help to recruit . • an attempt to reconnect a strong (demanding) conception of . the moral ideal of democracy. with the problem of . political outcome. •. democracy as process. - neither just an institutional system of government . The Rhetorical Situation. Rhetoric. – The study of how messages affect people. A speech takes place in a specific situation. A rhetorical situation is a situation in which people’s understandings can be changed through messages. Technological Assets in Participatory Democracy. Larry Schooler. Joseph Thormley. Nicole Cabral. Where’s Larry??. DIRECT ENGAGEMENT. • Conventional Engagement. : . Top down, relatively transparent. Technological Assets in Participatory Democracy. Larry Schooler. Joseph Thormley. Nicole Cabral. Where’s Larry??. DIRECT ENGAGEMENT. • Conventional Engagement. : . Top down, relatively transparent. Student Disability Services. Greenville Technical College. The Americans with Disabilities Act : ADA. Post Amendments. ADA Evolution. 1990: Signed into Law. 1992: Beginning implementation begins. 2000: Reauthorized: . Tianjun. Fu-Department of MIS, University of Arizona Tucson. Ahmed . Abbasi. -Department of MIS Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hsinchun. Chen-Department of MIS ,University of Arizona . Tuscon. By: Brian Goodwin. Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected GainFunction Research Involving Influenza MERS and SARS VirusesOctober172014US Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research A counter-interpretation sees unrestricted market ordering as a threat to political arrangements carefully crafted earlier in this century to provide goods collectively that will not be provided indiv Regulations Update. FOR DELIBERATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. Please note, the policies presented in these slides are proposals for deliberative purposes, and do not reflect the final regulations. . FOR DELIBERATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.