/
Multilateralism vs. Bilateralism Multilateralism vs. Bilateralism

Multilateralism vs. Bilateralism - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
384 views
Uploaded On 2017-08-19

Multilateralism vs. Bilateralism - PPT Presentation

Group of 23 Create table showing procons of multilateralism amp of bilateralism Purpose is to decide which multilateral or bilateral diplomacy is most effective Support reasoning with real world examples as much as you are able ID: 580190

rights ngos states human ngos rights human states table amp group advocacy global policy interests actors strategy opinion multilateralism

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Multilateralism vs. Bilateralism" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Multilateralism vs. Bilateralism

Group of 2-3

Create table showing pro/cons of multilateralism & of bilateralism

Purpose is to decide which (multilateral or bilateral diplomacy) is most effective

Support reasoning with real world examples as much as you are ableSlide2

Role of NGOs in Human Rights PolicySlide3

Non-state actors have effect on global H.R. policy/ diplomacy (esp. NGOs)

NGOs operate nationally or transnationally

Many specific transnational HUMAN RIGHTS NGOsSlide4

Transnational HRNGOs

Amnesty International (1961, London)- 150 countries, 2 million members

Human Rights Watch (1978, NYC)- 90+ countries

Minority Rights Group Int’l (1960s, London)

International Federation for Human Rights (1922, HQ in France)- umbrella org. for 170+ HR NGOs

Many TNGOs that focus on other areas do include HR in mission (like DRs w/o Borders)Slide5

HRNGO Advocacy

Resources: info + energy of people

“Name + shame” strategy

 embarrass offending gov’ts; mobilize citizens to pressure their gov’ts to act

Ex: Amnesty Int’l Nederland membership is ~1.8% of country’s population  powerful voiceSlide6

NGOs & States

We say non-governmental, BUT implementing/ enforcing H.R. is state responsibility- so, NGOs have to act on/ through states

Try to coordinate between levels/ orgs – other states/ multilateral actors to help w/ supporting pressureSlide7

NGO Advocacy

Sometimes NGOs are largely ineffective expressions of good intentions (Poverty, Inc.?)

Political, financial accountability?

Role of states?

How to define/ expand power of public opinion?

No other interests to distract them from advocacy (& maybe help check states’ tendency to let national interests mute HR concerns)

Accuracy/ impartiality- good resource

Help spread awareness of norms, mobilize force of opinionSlide8

Return to group &

pro/con table

Add NGOs (make new table if needed)

Bottom of table, or

sep

sheet, respond to prompt-

If forced to choose (even though the world does not work like this. Imagine.), which do you think is the most effective strategy for the monitoring and implementation of a global human rights regime?

[Pick 1 and support your response]