/
B.PHARM. 6 th  SEMESTER UNIT– III B.PHARM. 6 th  SEMESTER UNIT– III

B.PHARM. 6 th SEMESTER UNIT– III - PowerPoint Presentation

priscilla
priscilla . @priscilla
Follow
66 views
Uploaded On 2023-05-20

B.PHARM. 6 th SEMESTER UNIT– III - PPT Presentation

Quality Control Quality control test for containers rubber closures and secondary packing materials 1 QC of Packaging materials 2 PARTS OF PACKAGE amp PACKAGING MATERIALS 3 Material for containers ID: 998204

amp test paper containers test amp containers paper water glass solution quality packaging vials resistance testing package hydrolytic force

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "B.PHARM. 6 th SEMESTER UNIT– III" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. B.PHARM. 6th SEMESTER UNIT– III Quality Control: Quality control test for containers, rubber closures and secondary packing materials.1

2. QC of Packaging materials2

3. PARTS OF PACKAGE & PACKAGING MATERIALS3

4. Material for containers4

5. Material for closures5

6. Q.C. Tests for containers & closuresContainer: is article that contains/intended to contain drug substance/product and is/may be in direct contact with it.Closure: It is also part of containerMay be made of Glass, plastic, metal6

7. ContainerClosureMetalPlastic7

8. TYPES OF PACKAGING 8

9. 9

10. Choice of Packaging material will depend on10

11. Type of GlassHigh hydrolytic resistance used for injectables Moderate hydrolytic resistance, Used for Non aq. Liq. or powders 11Soda glass Non parenteral Usage

12. 12Lecture 2 Unit III

13. Plastics DefinitionGroup of substances, from natural/ synthetic origin, consist of mainly polymers of high molecular weight, molded into shape or desired form by heat & pressureTypes of Plastics13

14. 14

15. TAMPER RESISTANT PACKAGINGFilm wrappers- cellophane, polypropylene, thermoplasticBlister package- heat softened sheet of thermoplastic resin, PVC, Polyethylene combinations, polystyrene, PPStrip package- Paper, PE, Foil, PVCBubble package or wrap- transparent plastic, for protectionShrink seals: PVCPaperPlastic pouchesBottle seals- Two sheets of glassine paper (resist air, water, grease, used for separation)Tape seals- High density light wt. paper with poor tear strengthBreakable caps- Aluminum shells, breaks when cap is screwedSealed tubesAerosol containers15

16. Quality control Testing & Standards16

17. CHEMICAL TESTING OF GLASS CONTAINERS17Average overflow volume is determined121°C autoclaving60 minCombined liquids50ml Liq. +M redTitrate 0.01M HCl, Blank with D.H2O. Take differenceFor containers exposed with SO2, For surface alkali neutralizationTo increase Resistance of glass Test Done To determine if alkali leached from surface is with in limitsDone by Acid base TitrationAlkali components from glass containers like oxide of K, Na, Ca, Al etc. gets leached into purified waterMeasures transmission with reference to air at 290nm to 450nm, For non colored containers : not more than 10%Colored containers: As per the standardAbsorbance of test solution not more than absorbance obtained by 0.1 ml Arsenic standard solution 10ppm instead of 0.1 ppm for test solution

18. Powdered Glass Test (PGT): Leaching of Alkali from glass18

19. RESULTS Glass Types Test Limits (ml of 0.02N H2SO4)19

20. HYDROLYTIC RESISTANCE Nominal capacity of container (ml)Number of containers to be usedVolume of test solution to be used for titration (ml)≤ 5 Min. 10506-30Min. 550˃30 Min. 3100This determines average overflow volumeNumber of Glass containers to be used for Hydrolytic Resistance20

21. HYDROLYTIC RESISTANCE PROCEDURE21

22. Other Tests for Glass containers22

23. Metal Container test for eye ointment23

24. Metal Particle scoreMetal Particle SizeScore≤ 1mm500.5 mm-1 mm100.2mm-0.5mm2˂ 0.2mmNilTotal ScoreResult˂ 100Lot passes˃ 150Lot fails100-150Repeat Test on another sample of 50 tubesThe lot passes if sum of total scores in the two tests is ˂ than 150 points24

25. Plastic container test for non injectable preparationsLeakage Test: 10 containers filled with water, kept inverted at RT for 24 Hrs. No sign of leakage from any containers Collapsibility Test: At the required rate of flow & ambient Temp., container should yield at least 90% of its contents by collapsing inward during useClarity Test: Unlabelled, non labelled, unmarked portion is selected. Portions are cut into strips with area of ˂ 20 sq.cm, Strips washed with DW , draining water. Strips with total area 1250 sq cm, in flask + 250ml DW, cover, Autoclave at121 C for 30 min. Blank Determination on DW in flask. Cool flask, extract examined. Should be Free from turbidlyNon Volatile Residue Test: 100 ml extract of above CT, evaporated & dried to constant weight at 105C. Residue : not more than 12.5mg25

26. Plastic containers for injectable preparationsLeakage Test10 containers Collapsibility TestTransparency Test 16 fold dilution of standard suspension Std. susp. : 1g hydrazine sulphate +DW to produce 100ml, 25 ml of this + 25 ml 10% w/v solution of hexamine 15 ml of above diluted to 1000ml with DW (std susp.)Fill 5 empty containers with susp. Cloudiness of each is compared with DW. If cloudiness matches with DW sample pasess Water vapour permeability Test5 containers filled with a nominal volume of water, sealed, weighed, allowed to stand for 14 days at 60±5% RH & 20-25°C. After 14 days containers are reweighed . Loss in weight should not be more than 0.2% 26

27. Rubber Closure for containers for injectable preparations27

28. 28Sterilization TestSample closures should not soften/tacky, should be without any visual change after sterilization Fragmentation TestDone for closures intended for piercing by Hypodermic needleClose the vials with rubber closure, inj. 1ml water, remove 1 ml of air. Repeat for 4 times for each closure, piercing done at different sites No. of fragments visible are counted which is not more than 10Self sealability (done for multi dose container closures)10 vials, filled with water, close the vials with rubber closures, pierce each with hypodermic needle, immerse the vials upright in 01.% w/v methylene blue sol. Reduce ext. pressure by 27 kPa for 10 min. Restore the atm. Pressure, leave vials for 30 min. in sol. Rinse vials from outside, No traces of colored solu. Inside - Passes

29. 29pH of aqueous extractSol. A 20ml + 0.1 ml Bromo thymol blueNot more than 0.8 ml of 0.01M HCl or 0.3 ml of 0.01M NaOH is required to change color of solution to yellow or blue resp.Heavy Metals20ml Solution AComplies with Limit Test as per I.P.Residue on Evaporation50 ml of solution A evaporated to dryness on water bath & dried at 105°CResidue weighs not more than 4 mg

30. SECONDARY PACKAGING MATERIALSPaper & board should pass followingTest carried at Temp. 23°C±1°C, RH: 50%± 2%Moisture content Folding endurance Air permeability Tensile strength Stiffness Burst resistanceDensity Grammage (g/m2)Tear Strength Puncture ResistanceCreasibility Cobb Test (g/m2) 30

31. Test for Paper & boards31SNTestDescription1Moisture contentThe material moisture measured at specific temperature 2Folding EnduranceThe piece is folded back & forth until it ruptures3Density of materialDone for rigid cellular materials4Air permeabilityFor using light weight uncoated paper on machine with vacuum pick system, expressed in µm /pa/s5Tensile StrengthMaximum force /unit width a paper or board can withstand 6Tear StrengthMean force required to continue tearing of an initial cut in a single sheet paper7Burst ResistanceMaximum uniformly distributed hydraulic pressure applied at right angles which a test piece can bear till it burst8Puncture ResistanceEnergy required for initial puncture9Stiffness Degree of resistance offered by the test sample when it is bent10Cobb TestTest for water absorbency

32. Test for Paper & boards32SNTestDescription11GammageDetermines wt. of material/ unit area of sample12CreasibilityFor creasing quality of board within range of 300-1000µm13Paper caliperThickness of single sheet between one surface & other14Nitrogenous constituents in sampleApplicable to substances with high affinity for acid dyes15pH, Cl/ SO4pH determination helps to decide the life of paper/board16Pick TestSpecific amt. of oil added to printing system & printed on test piece. The surface is examined for any signs of pick17Wet burst TestTest piece immersed in water to determine the wet burst of sample18Ash TestTo determine ash content of paper / board19Ink AbsorbencyInk absorbency of paper or board by K & N ink 20Roughness/ SmoothnessDeciding test for printability of paper

33. QC TEST FOR CARTONS33Compression: To asses the strength of upright package to ensure the degree of protection it will provideJoint Shear Test: For testing the glued lap seam on the side of a carton for strength of adhesive using a tensile testing machine. To ensure that correct adhesive has been used to glue the cardboardCrease Stiffness: Crease recovery test. Testing a piece of carton by folding it at 90°. When force is removed the folds try to recover the original positionsCarton Opening Force: Used to hold flat carton as delivered by its creases between thumb & first finger press. It should open without any much force Coefficient of Friction: Static & kinetic coefficients are determined by sliding specimen over itself under specific test conditions

34. REFERENCES1. B.P. Nagori, Ajay Gaur, Renu Solanki, Vipin Mathur, Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Scientific Publishers, Delhi, 2018. 2. Swarnali Das Paul, Gunjan Jeswani, Concise course in Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, S. Vikas and company, Punjab. 2019.3. Jasuja S, Kataria MK, Quality control testing of packaging materials, Pharmatutor, Ref. I.D. 4. Zadbuke N, Shahi S, Gulecha B, Padalkar A, Thube M. Recent trends and future of pharmaceutical packaging technology. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(2):98‐110. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.1118205. www.google.com34