In The Cryosphere Kristine M Larson httpkristinelarsonnet Outline Overview on GPSIR and PBO H 2 O Cryosphere applications of GPSIR snow depth variations ice sheets permafrost tides ID: 792082
Download The PPT/PDF document "Some New Things You Can Do With GPS" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Some New Things You Can Do With GPS
In The Cryosphere
Kristine M. Larson,
http://kristinelarson.net
Slide2Outline
Overview on GPS-IR and PBO H2OCryosphere applications of GPS-IR:
snow depth variations
ice sheets
permafrost
tides
How to set up GPS-IR
Final Remarks
Slide353
What is GPS-IR?
GPS Interferometric Reflectometry
Direct Signal
Direct Signal
A GPS receiver records the interference between the direct and reflected GPS signals. More typically one simply calls this
multipath
.
Reflected Signal
Slide4frequency of signal strength data depends on
H, the GPS transmit frequency
, and the
reflecting medium.
Footprint depends on H and e.
Effectively your GPS site becomes an interferometer
Slide5Example: reflector heights change when water levels change.
We use the frequency of the interference pattern in SNR data to find the distance to the “reflector.”
Simulated Signal to
Noise Ratio Data
Slide6GPS-IR Reflection Zone
For a ~2 meter high antenna in North America ~2012
Slide7Where does GPS-IR work?
open areas where reflection region is ~smooth
Slide8http://xenon.colorado.edu/portal
Slide953
PBO H
2
O & Terrestrial Hydrology
soil moisture: land-atmosphere interactions; runoff and infiltration; plant productivity.
snow depth/snow water equivalent: timing and amount of runoff; influences climate.
above-ground biomass: global carbon budget; influences climate.
Slide10Why measure these things with GPS receivers?
Supplement other in situ sensors, many of which have very small footprints and/or are expensive to maintain.Satellites have very large footprints (and don’t work well in some conditions).Ground sensors are needed both for assimilation and satellite validation.
It’s cheap.
Slide11Snow: > 200 sites
PBO H
2
O
Slide12last week in Boulder
last week’s blizzard
as of yesterday
Slide1353
53
Island Park, Idaho
Slide14More about PBO H
2O on Thursday morning from Eric Small
Slide15Constraints on snow accumulation and
firn density in Greenland using GPS receivers
Kristine M. LARSON,
John WAHR,
Peter KUIPERS MUNNEKE
Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 61, No. 225, 2015 doi: 10.3189/2015JoG14J130
Slide1653
GPS in Greenland
Data from the GLISN network
Slide17meters
DEM
meters
km
All positions courtesy of Nevada Reno
Slide18GCN data courtesy of Koni Steffen
GLS1
Snow Level Variations Measured Using GPS-IR
Slide19Ultrasonic/GPS-IR Differences
GPS-IR footprint is much, much larger than the ultrasonic sensorGPS instrument was not installed to measure snow level, so it’s a freebie.GPS currently has better latency than the ultrasonic but they could be the same.
Slide20A different story at GLS3 - but an interesting story.
Slide211. You can measure how far the GPS receiver is
with respect to the center of the Earth
2. And you can use GPS-IR to measure how far away the top of the snow layer is.
DEM
3. This means you have sensitivity to the density of the firn layer & accumulation rates.
Slide22Positions from GLS3
mounted on a 90 m borehole
moved to standard GLISN mount
height increased
positions from Nevada Reno
Slide23Distance from antenna to the top of the snow
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Moved the pole anchor
Made pole taller
GPS-IR Results
Slide24reflector heights
Reflector heights predicted by firn model
Geocentric, Eulerian snow surface elevations (positions minus reflector heights corrected for downhill flow of the ice sheet)
Geocentric, Eulerian snow surface elevations predicted by firn model
Please see more about John Wahr’s modeling
in J. Glaciology article.
Slide25Barrow, Alaska
in the winter
Slide26Barrow, Alaska in the summer
Slide27SG27: GPS antenna phase center is ~3.8 meters above the surface
Surface
Active Layer (~50 cm)
GPS monument extends ~3 meters below the surface, well below the active layer.
GPS-IR measures this number
Slide28Vertical Positions from Nevada Reno
Slide2953
Kachemak Bay site installed by Jeff Freymueller;Larson et al., The Accidental Tide Gauge,
IEEE GRSL
, 2013
Comparison between GPS Tide Gauge and ‘Real
’
Tide Gauge
GPS Tide Gauge
Slide30Relevance to the Cryosphere, Palmer Station
GPS
Slide31Practical Issues Related to Using GPS-IR in the Cryosphere
Slide32Height of the antenna above the reflector controls the reflection region - not the horizontal distance.
Track all signals (L2C, L5, GLONASS, etc) if this is feasible (power, telemetry).
Steenbras Dam, Republic of South Africa
Slide33water storage
(outline added)
water storage data:
https://www.dwa.gov.za/Hydrology/Weekly/percentile.aspx?station=%20G4R001
water level derived from reflected
GPS signals
GPS derived
water level
Slide34The required sampling rate depends on the height of the antenna - and 15 sec is perfectly fine for many sites.
L2C is not always required - these tide records were computed with L1 SNR data (and 15 seconds).
Slide35A roof isn’t great for GPS-IR, but sometimes it can be used
Don’t use an elevation mask (low elevation angle signals are great for GPS-IR).
If you want to use a roof, put the antenna closest to the edge of the roof that is near something interesting.
You can easily predict the GPS-IR characteristics of your set up BEFORE you go in the field.
Slide36Choke-rings (and their relatives) do not stop multipath. Just sayin.
Slide37Final Remarks
It is straightforward to measure snow depth variations with data recorded by GPS instruments.Subsidence caused by active layer melt is measurable by GPS.GPS provides a simple and economical way to measure water levels in all seasons.GPS instruments installed in ice sheets are sensitive to firn density and accumulation rates.As power, memory, and telemetry allows, track all GNSS signals. You never know - it might be useful.
Slide3853
Eric Small, Valery Zavorotny, and John Braun
Felipe Nievinski, Penina Axelrad, Andria Bilich, Ethan Gutmann, Clara Chew, Sarah Evans, Praveen Vikram, Karen Boniface, John Pratt, Evan Pugh, Bill Smith, Steve Running, John Kimball, Dennis Akos, Brian Hornbuckle, Tyson Ochsner, Jobie Carlisle, Mark Williams, Matt Jones, Mesa County Surveyors, Jeff Freymueller, John Wahr, Simon Williams, Minnesota DOT.
NSF GEO: Climate and Large-Scale Dynamics, Physical and Dynamic Meteorology, Hydrologic Sciences, EarthScope, Instrumentation and Facilities, Education and Outreach.
NASA: Earth Surface and Interior, Natural Hazards, AIST, and Terrestrial Hydrology.
UNAVCO maintains the EarthScope PBO sites with funding from NSF.
Acknowledgements
Slide39Tide Gauge GPS |Diff|
Tide Amp Phase Amp Phase (cm)
Sa 6.1 274.8 5.8 277.6 0.37
Ssa 1.5 227.7 1.6 220.1 0.21
Mf 2.0 168.2 2.0 162.4 0.20
Q1 7.4 250.0 7.5 249.9 0.13
O1 43.4 258.1 44.0 258.6 0.78
P1 23.6 278.7 23.1 278.0 0.54
S1 2.6 31.2 1.6 59.2 1.37
K1 76.0 280.0 76.0 279.0 1.33
J1 4.0 311.6 4.0 310.5 0.08
N2 12.1 342.4 12.0 343.1 0.15
M2 56.0 10.5 56.4 10.2 0.50
S2 13.3 36.0 13.2 34.9 0.25
MK3 1.2 26.8 1.2 33.9 0.16
M4 1.7 121.2 1.5 121.1 0.17
MS4 1.0 131.4 0.8 131.4 0.17
M6 0.5 236.0 0.4 255.1 0.18
Comparison of 10 year tide gauge records at Friday Harbor
Richard Ray, Simon Williams, Kristine Larson
Slide40Far from optimal “tide gauge”
Slide41INSAR-Alaska