PPT-Interfaces in Evolving Cyber-Physical

Systems of Systems CPSoSs Bernhard Fr ömel lt froemelvmarstuwienacat gt Institute of Computer Engineering Vienna University of Technology Outline Introduction and Objectives. Bike:. A . Step Towards Safer Green Transportation. S. . Smaldone. C. . Tonde. V. K. . . Ananthanarayanan. A. . Elgammal. L. . Iftode. Summarized by Yuki. Outline. Analysis. Design. Implementation. and Actuator Networks . with Packet . Loss. Ahmed . Alhafdhi. Feng. Xia*, . Xiangjie. Kong, and . Zhenzhen. . Xu. School. of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116620, China. Agenda. Brian Connett, LCDR, USN. US NAVAL ACADEMY. Cyber. “A failure by the Department to secure its systems in cyberspace would pose a fundamental . risk . to our ability to accomplish defense missions today and in the future.” . Christine Hasha. Matt Mereness. April 2015. At the end of this presentation you will be able to:. Explain why the electricity industry is under federal regulation for physical and cyber protection. Describe some of the physical and cyber risks to the electric grid. Stanley . Bak. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (Some slides from Joel . Van Der . Woude. ). Problem . Cyber-physical systems are vulnerable to cyber attack.. Attacks on critical infrastructure bring physical consequences.. INTERACTIONS. Chapter 6. Patrick . Hutto. Dongjin Kim. John . Difante. Lee Hailey. Introduction. Pre-1990s – efficient and effective interfaces . was . main goal. GUI advances, Internet, cell phones, . What was all that direct manipulation mumbo-jumbo?. People invented GUIs. People liked GUIs. Researchers’ articulation/characterization of what it is about GUIs that make them likable/effective => “Direct manipulation”. Current . market(s) and drivers of change. Scott Kannry. 03.20.2015. Society of Risk Management Consultants. 2. 1. st. Party Damages. (to your organization). Financial. Damages. Tangible (Physical) Damages. Ahmed Saeed. †. , Azin Neishaboori. ‡. , Amr Mohamed. †. , and Khaled A. Harras. ‡. College of Engineering, Qatar University. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University Qatar. Outline. of Cyber-Physical . Systems. Akshay . Rajhans, . Shang-Wen . Cheng, . Bradley . Schmerl, . David . Garlan, Bruce H. . . Krogh, . Clarence . Agbi and . Ajinkya Bhave. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Good News, Bad News and . Looking Forward. Haibo Chen. What is CPCC?. A . cloudy. definition by NIST of US . “a . system environment that can rapidly build, modify and provision cyber-physical systems composed of a set of cloud computing based sensor, processing, control, and data . Security and Privacy in Cyber-Physical Systems. Spring 2018. CS 599.. Instructor: Jyo Deshmukh. Acknowledgment: Some of the material in these slides is based on the lecture slides for CIS 540: Principles of Embedded Computation taught by Rajeev Alur at the University of Pennsylvania. http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~cis540/. of Cyber-Physical . Systems. Akshay . Rajhans, . Shang-Wen . Cheng, . Bradley . Schmerl, . David . Garlan, Bruce H. . . Krogh, . Clarence . Agbi and . Ajinkya Bhave. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Interface . types. highlight the main design and research issues for each of the different interfaces. Consider which interface is best for a given application or activity. www.id-book.com. 2. 1. Command-based.