/
Changes in Life Expectation for Diffuse Large Changes in Life Expectation for Diffuse Large

Changes in Life Expectation for Diffuse Large - PowerPoint Presentation

roberts
roberts . @roberts
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-11

Changes in Life Expectation for Diffuse Large - PPT Presentation

BCell Lymphoma DLBCL Patients 1983 2014 results from analysis of US SEER data Ron Dewar Registry and Analytics Nova Scotia Health Authority Canada Nadia Howlader Angela ID: 916244

expectation life 1983 dlbcl life expectation dlbcl 1983 cancer years age 2014 survival expectancy patients lymphoma stage seer population

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Changes in Life Expectation for Diffuse ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Changes in Life Expectation for Diffuse Large

B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients, 1983 – 2014 results from analysis of US SEER dataRon Dewar, Registry and Analytics,Nova Scotia Health Authority (Canada)Nadia Howlader, Angela Mariotto,National Cancer Institute (USA)Presented to the joint NAACCR / IACR meeting, June 2019

Slide2

Overview and Objectives

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)Introduce concept of expectation of lifeExpectation of life for general populationExpectation of life for cancer patient populationResults and their interpretationData sourcesSSA projections SEER*Stat (9 SEER registries 1983 – 2014)

Slide3

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

B-Cell Lymphomas > 90% of all Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (SEER 9, 2016)DLBCL ~23% of all B-Cell Lymphoma incidence, ~1/3 of NHL deathsRecent decline in incidence (since 2004) and mortality (since 1998) Improvements in 5-yr survival possibly due introduction of targeted therapies (rituximab) to standard (CHOP) Consider the impact of this disease on the future life expectancy of DLBCL patients in US

Slide4

Expectation of Life

Total years lived (or projected to live) by all members of a cohort, divided by the initial cohort sizeGeneral population life expectation is published regularly, based on current (or projected) mortality rates Commonly expressed as ‘life expectancy at birth’, but can be computed from any age starting point (‘residual life expectancy’)Corresponding calculation for cancer patients?

Slide5

Expectation of Life: All Cause

Mortality and Proportion Surviving, US women, 2014Mortality rate (all causes)Expectation of lifeAt ageYears081Proportion alive (survival curve)

85

7.1

Slide6

Extrapolate patient all causes (observed) survival

Evaluation by T. Andersson (2012) suggests:Model, then extrapolate relative survival (AKA excess hazard) stable for many sites after 7 – 10 yearsCalculate observed survival using expected survival estimate, sinceRS = OS/expected, thenOS = RS * expectedNumerical integration of extrapolated OS curveData sourcesSEER 9, Nov 2016 dataset, ~ 32,000 DLBCL patients (1983 – 2014) covariates: age in years survival time in months

sex

Ann Arbor

Lymphoma (1983

+) Stage

complete life

tables for US (1970 – 2015

) (from SEER*Stat)

Life

Tables for the United States Social Security

Area

(1900-2100)

https://

www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/pdf_studies/study120.pdf

Calculation of expectation of life, cancer patients

Slide7

Difference between population expectation and expectation for cancer patients

Compute at the individual or summed over all individuals to obtain a population level measure of disease burdenExpress as loss in expectation of life (LEL) in years proportion (%) of future life years lostPossible interpretations population burden of cancer (total years lost) change over time as measure of progress impact of covariate distribution impact on individual with specific covariates (age, sex, stage, …)

Loss in expectation of life

Slide8

Expectation of Life, Women in

US, 2015 at age 55showing Loss in Expectation of Life (LEL)YearsPopulation30.4

Years

LEL

%LEL

Population

30.4

DLBCL

22.1

8.4

27.5

Years

Population

30.4

DLBCL

22.1

Slide9

Trends in Life Expectancy for DLBCL patients US SEER data (1983 – 2014)

Age atDiagnosisCancer LifeExpectancy1983(years)Cancer Life

Expectancy

2014

(years)

Proportion

Lost

1983

(%)

Proportion

Lost

2014

(%)

55

Women

12

22

58

28

65

 

7

14

63

33

75

 

4

8

69

38

85

 247444      55Men919613065 613633275 37663685 137343

Slide10

DLBCL Life Expectancy by age and sex, 1983 - 2014

8.4 years

Slide11

Loss of Life Expectancy (%) by age and sex,

DLBCL 1983 - 201427.5%

Slide12

Trends in Life Expectancy* for DLBCL patients

by Ann Arbor (1983+) Lymphoma stageLymphoma Ann Arbor stage (1983)Cancer LifeExpectancy1983(years)

Cancer Life

Expectancy

2014

(years)

Proportion

Lost

1983

(%)

Proportion

Lost

2014

(%)

Women

I

8

14

48

25

II

 

7

14

55

24

III

 

5

12

72

32

IV 4117641      MenI7124926II 6125725III 4117334IV 

3

9

77

42

*Age

standardised

to 2014 age distribution

Slide13

Loss Life Expectancy* (%) for

DLBCL patients by Ann Arbor (1983+) Lymphoma stage*Age standardised to 2014 age distribution

Slide14

Conclusions

Recent advances in survival from DLBCL can be seen in the US SEER data across all ages and stage groups (1983 – 2014 data)Disease burden (age standardised % Loss in Life Expectancy) is now similar for Ann Arbor (1983+) Stage I and II at 25% for both men and womenLoss in Expectation of Life can be seen as an adjunct to survival estimates and may improve communication patient – physician interaction managers and planners of the cancer systemCaveats: need a wider conversation around uses, interpretation

availability of projected life tables (ideal, but not entirely necessary)

sensitivity to modeling choices should be evaluated and reported

stage-specific

trends

subject to same caveats as survival trends

Slide15

Thanks to:

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Cancer Care ProgramNational Cancer InstituteSEER*StatDr. Paul Lambert, Dr. Therese Andersson (authors of Stata routines)

Slide16

Any questions?