/
Characterisation of ESRF-EBS BPM blocks Characterisation of ESRF-EBS BPM blocks

Characterisation of ESRF-EBS BPM blocks - PowerPoint Presentation

roberts
roberts . @roberts
Follow
69 views
Uploaded On 2023-06-21

Characterisation of ESRF-EBS BPM blocks - PPT Presentation

B Roche Acknowledgments K Scheidt N Benoist F Taoutaou special thanks to A Nosych DEELS 2018 18 th April 2018 Outline BPM block characterization Button to button transmissions ID: 1001185

2018 button blocks bpm button 2018 bpm blocks page sensitivity chamber buttons roche measured chambers reception neg girder beam

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Characterisation of ESRF-EBS BPM blocks" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. Characterisation of ESRF-EBS BPM blocks B. RocheAcknowledgments: K. Scheidt, N. Benoist, F. Taoutaouspecial thanks to: A. NosychDEELS 201818th April 2018

2. OutlineBPM block characterizationButton to button transmissionsChambers reception and test procedureOutputProblems evidencedPerspectivesDEELS 2018 - B. ROCHEPage 2

3. Button to button transmissionsmeasurement of button to button transmission4 x 3 measurements → sensitivity (or gain) of each of the 4 buttonsPage 3DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHERF-in (352 MHz)-87 dB-88 dB-65 dBsparkSparkABCDRF352.2MHzlaptopABCDSw-APoERF-switch controlSw-BSw-CSw-DSw-P

4. button sensitivity calculationThe so-called Lambertson method gives a way to compute the button’s sensitivity from button-to-button transmissions:We get 3 values for the gi’s:Page 4DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHEVi is the voltage at the buttongi is the gain (or sensitivity) associated with the buttonGij is the capacity coupling coefficientCalibration of position electrodes using external measurementsGR Lambertson - LSAP Note-5, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1987Offset Calibration of the Beam Position Monitor Using External MeansY Chung, G Decker - AIP Conference Proceedings, 1992References:

5. Button to button transmissionsPage 5DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHEInterconnection plateAutonomous system:On a trolley to be able to move easily (along a girder, and in different buildings)No connection to ESRF network (for reliability)Give an immediate answer if BPM is OK or NOTRF generatorSwitch-boxassembly buildingOhm-meter

6. Chambers reception and test procedureEvery BPM blocks are measured 2 times:At reception, just after heater installationAfter assembly on a girder with magnets, cables from BPM to interconnection plate, etc.Between the two tests chambers experience bake-out, NEG-coating (not all of them)…Test procedure consists in:measuring DC resistanceperforming RF transmission measurementCurrent state (April 2018):127 BPM blocks received and measured over the 320 BPM84 assembled on a girder and ready for installationPage 6DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHE

7. Problem evidencedFinite resistance between button and chambera few cases found (8 chambers affected)resistances ranging from short-circuit to MOhmsworse case was a NEG coated chamber with all 4 buttons affected → solved by blowing gas on buttonsAlso had a freshly received chamber affected (pollution not only coming from NEG coating)We don’t know the origin of this pollution yet. So far we treated buttons by burning « impurities » under vacuum with a voltage source.→ all cases treated with successAn interconnection RF cable found groundedCable replaced, manufacturer informed Page 7DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHE

8. Problem evidencedRetracted buttons:A small number of buttons have been found retractedThese chambers will not be installed (kept as spares) Page 8DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHEperfectC-button strongly retracted-0.77 dB0.29 dB

9. Problem evidencedDiscrepancies between manufacturersChamber #1 and #14 are similar, with the difference that they are made by different manufacturersRF transmission measurements show different variability in buttons’ sensitivity Page 9DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHE

10. PerspectivesMore characterisations:A more suitable RF-switch box will be done (better switches, power calibration, …)BPM blocks will also be electrically measured after installation (check cabling, measure button to chamber resistivity).Minimize offset of a BPM block by compensating for:Mechanical offset → measured by alignment group (chamber deformation, misalignment with adjacent quadrupoles)Buttons’ sensitivityOffset due to electronics (Libera Spark) / RF-cablingAlso:Take non-linear effect of the BPM blocks into account→ work in collaboration with ALBA (A. Nosych)Compensating for BPM offsets will be essential for ESRF-EBS commissioning (first turns). Once we will have a stored beam, beam base alignment techniques will be used to measure BPM offsets more precisely.Page 10DEELS 2018 - B. ROCHE