/
Panglossian  Paradigm A  Panglossian  Paradigm A 

Panglossian Paradigm A  - PowerPoint Presentation

rose
rose . @rose
Follow
65 views
Uploaded On 2023-10-04

Panglossian Paradigm A  - PPT Presentation

panglossian  is optimistic regardless of the circumstances Panglossian Adjective Expecting a favorable outcome or dwelling on hopeful aspects Optimistic positive confident hopeful bright ID: 1022302

adaptive evolutionary panglossian gould evolutionary adaptive gould panglossian shell function paradigm ultra lewontin selection change seemingly features exaptation darwinians

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Panglossian Paradigm A " is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. Panglossian Paradigm

2. A panglossian is optimistic regardless of the circumstances.PanglossianAdjective Expecting a favorable outcome or dwelling on hopeful aspectsOptimistic: positive, confident, hopeful, brightParadigm mean concept, hypothesis, theory, idea

3. The term “Panglossian Paradigm” was coined by evolutionary biologists Stephen J. Gould and Richard Lewontin.Darwin, one of the evolutionary biologists emphasised that natural selection is not the only mechanism for evolutionary change. For him, sexual selection explained many seemingly non-adaptive features of the living world.

4. Geographical separation – as of the famous finches on the different Galapagos islands – are another, as separated populations will gradually drift apart by chance for random variation quite apart from any other adaptive pressures.And what does one mean by adaptation anyhow? Ultra-Darwinians insist, for instance, that all the subtle (slight, fine, delicate) variations that can be found in the banding patterns of snail shells are adaptive.

5. Such rigid adaptationism famously came under attack by Gould and Lewontin who described it as a ‘Panglossian paradigm.’ They pointed out that some seemingly functional aspects of an organism may be the accidental consequences of some quite other feature – for example, the spandrels (or spaces) between the arches which support the dome of Venice ’s San Marco.

6. The spandrels are covered by glorious mosaics, which gives the illusion that they were designed to carry them, but architecturally they have no structural function. In Darwinian terms they are not adaptive. So too with biological features that might seem at first sight adaptive – such as the pattern of bands on a snail’s shell – but are accidental consequences of the chemistry and physics of shell construction.

7. But Arthur Cain, a Liverpool evolutionary geneticist considered that different shell colours camouflage the snails more or less effectively against predation by thrushes depending on whether the snails were in woodland or in open fields, it followed that every aspect of the patterning of the snail shells he studied had an adaptive function.

8. It was Gould and Elizabeth Vrba who gave the name to yet another potential contributor to evolutionary change: exaptation. An exaptation is some feature of an organism origin for one function that may also serve as the basis for another. The favourite example is that of feathers, believed to have evolved among small dinosaurs as a means of regulating body temperature, but which also enabled flight in the precursors of modern birds.

9. For Gould such exaptations are an indicator of the chance or opportunistic nature of evolutionary processes, relying as they do on multiple mechanisms. If, as Gould repeatedly insisted, one could ‘wind the tape of evolution back ’to the pre-Cambrian or some other remote geological period and let it run forward again, it is very unlikely that sentient mammals like humans would appear. That is, the evolutionary future is unpredictable.This suggestion is unpalatable (inedible, indigestible, revolting, unpleasant) to those ultra-Darwinians who are happier with a more rigid determinism.

10.