/
Funding and Environmental Review in the Transit Planning Process Funding and Environmental Review in the Transit Planning Process

Funding and Environmental Review in the Transit Planning Process - PowerPoint Presentation

scoopulachanel
scoopulachanel . @scoopulachanel
Follow
346 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-03

Funding and Environmental Review in the Transit Planning Process - PPT Presentation

Current System 70M operating budget 10M annual ridership 31 routes countywide paratransit each with different weekday Saturday Sunday schedules Service is infrequent short weekend and evening hours ID: 796001

line transit environmental projects transit line projects environmental red rapid county project indygo dedicated income brt lanes mile budget

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Funding and Environmental Review in the ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Funding and Environmental Review in the Transit Planning Process

Slide2

Current System

$70M operating budget

10M

annual ridership

31 routes + countywide paratransit, each with different weekday, Saturday, Sunday schedulesService is infrequent, short weekend and evening hoursRunning old buses – $10M of federal capital replacement funds are used for operating each year

2

2016 Snapshot:

Spread out, tough to use, but getting the most out of the resources it has.

Slide3

Transit Planning

1990-2010

– Focus on a single commuter rail line to no result

2010

 

- Central Indiana Transit Task Force endorses a wholistic solution of local bus improvements and BRT

2012

Alternatives Analysis completed for Red and Blue Line BRT Projects

2014

State legislation authorizes county-by-county income tax for dedicated transit projects

2015

IndyGo secures funding to advance the Red Line BRT

Slide4

Marion County Transit Plan

4

70%

increase in Vehicle Revenue Miles

BRT Lines

form spines of systemNo change of coverageInvest in frequency, with longer service hours and every route running every day

Efficient Grid vs. Hub and Spoke network design

Slide5

Red Line Rapid Transit

5

13.1

miles of battery-electric BRT 

15%

of all IndyGo Boarding Activity 1% of IndyGo Service Area60k residents within 0.5 mile

140k employees within 0.5 mile

60%

Dedicated Lanes

$96.3M

Project Budget

Slide6

0.25% INCOME TAX

Red Line: Center Exclusive

Slide7

Red Line: Bi-Directional

7

Slide8

Purple Line Rapid Transit

8

14.8

mile corridor

High Concentration

Low-income and zero-car HHInterlines with the Red LineOpen 202190% Dedicated Lanes$140M

Project Budget

Slide9

Purple Line Rapid Transit

9

Slide10

Blue Line Rapid Transit

10

~20

mile corridor

East/West Spine

from Cumberland to Indianapolis AirportOpen 2022

>80% Dedicated Lanes

$195M

Project Budget

Slide11

Blue Line Rapid Transit

11

Slide12

2016 Referendum

654

Indy Connect education engagements

59.4%

Marion County voters approved 0.25% income tax

$54M

leveraged annually, beginning October 2017

Slide13

Capital Investment Grants

Otherwise known as “CIG”

Intended

to assist transit agencies with intense capital projects

Small Starts for projects with a total project cost of $300m or less New Starts for projects greater than $300 million13

Slide14

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

Otherwise known as “NEPA”

Required

for all projects, transit or otherwise, which are actively seeking or have been awarded federal funds

How does NEPA work for transit? - Class of Action - Documented Categorical Exclusion - Environmental Assessment - Environmental Impact Statement - Investigations of possible impacts - Documentation - Mitigation - Addressing potential unusual circumstances

14

Slide15

Documented Categorical Exclusion

Documented Categorical Exclusion

Class of Action

for two of Indianapolis’s bus rapid transit lines

DCE Characteristics: - Simplified forms of the environmental review process Unique for Transit Projects compared to road projects that are the norm - Repurposing of lanes - Vertical construction at intervals 15

Slide16

Critical Considerations

Critical considerations

must be taken into account when carrying out an environmental evaluation of any nature:

- Localized impacts

- Corridor-level impacts - Community reaction/feedback - Outreach and coordination - Mitigation - Response to public and agency comments - Environmental Justice

16

Slide17

Contact  

www.IndyGo.net​www.IndyGoRed.com​

317.635.3344​

@

IndyGoBus17