/
OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-in-Progress Webinar OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-in-Progress Webinar

OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-in-Progress Webinar - PowerPoint Presentation

serenemain
serenemain . @serenemain
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-08-03

OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-in-Progress Webinar - PPT Presentation

Dennis Massie A Glimpse of the ILL Yeti Stalking the Big Big Picture of Systemwide Collection Sharing Program Officer OCLC Research 5 May 2015 Whats an ILL Yeti anyway How the study came to be ID: 795910

oclc net reported year net oclc year reported ill trending previous institutions requests activity arl docline venue rapid lend

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-i..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-in-Progress Webinar

Dennis Massie

A Glimpse of the ILL Yeti:Stalking the Big, Big Picture of System-wide Collection Sharing

Program Officer, OCLC Research 5 May 2015

Slide2

What’s an “ILL Yeti” anyway?How the study came to bePhase One: looking at the big pictureCurrent phase: going pixel (pixal

?)What comes next Questions and discussionToday’s Stalking Itinerary

Slide3

What’s an “ILL Yeti” anyway?

Slide4

Not a

sick

Sasquatch

Slide5

How the study came to be

Slide6

Current Interlending Landscape

FragmentedMany systems in playOpaqueStatistics reported in gross numbersEvolvingNew models and methods emerging

6

Slide7

OCLC ILL statistics

7

FY13FY12FY11FY10

FY09ILL requests8,858,3689,192,189

9,587,429

10,248,942

10,279,215

Year on year

4%

4%

6%

0.29%

Between FY09 and FY13, OCLC ILL has seen a 14% reduction in total number of ILL requests.

Anecdotal evidence tells us that US libraries are seeing an ongoing increase in their borrowing.

OCLC wants to learn more about various trends in fulfillment.

Slide8

The Elusive Big PictureIs

resource sharing activity across the entire library community increasing, decreasing, or staying the same?Are there similarities among those libraries where activity is decreasing, and among those where it is increasing?What factors determine the selection of a

model or method for each borrowing request?8

Slide9

Made up of

11 institutions with active, sophisticated, innovative resource sharing operationsSome long-established members, some newer membersInvolved in all manner of consortial arrangements

within and outside the groupWould serve as an excellent illustration of current trends in the research library community9

Slide10

Phase One: looking at the big picture

Slide11

ARL ILL Stats for 11 BD InstitutionsFilled Requests

Slide12

Our ILL Stats for 11 BD InstitutionsFilled Requests

12

Slide13

ARL vs Our StudyWhy might the numbers differ?

Institutions with multiple libraries and with complex ILL set-up’s might not have reported all activity to us.

Both sets of data are self-reported, and possibly compiled by different people. Potential fiscal/calendar confusion

Overall, study participants reported 97.9% of what was reported to ARL.

13

Slide14

Our Borrow Direct Numbers (99.7% agreement between

borr & lend)

14

Slide15

Our OCLC NumbersFilled Requests

15

Slide16

Our RapidILL NumbersFilled Requests

16

Slide17

Our Docline Numbers Filled Requests

17

Slide18

Proportion by Sharing Venue

(Other = Web form, ALA form, email, CCC, other circ-to-circ groups)

18

Slide19

Do you net lend or borrow, trend up or down?All 11 BD institutions

Venue

2010201120122013Overall

BD

OCLC

RapidILL

Docline

Other

19

= Net borrower

= Net lender

Trending up from previous year

Trending down from previous year

Slide20

BD, OCLC, and RAPID ComparisonFilled Requests

20

Slide21

BD, Combined C2C, OCLC, and RAPID Comparison -- Filled Requests

21

Slide22

Current phase: going pixel

Slide23

Total activity by date joined

23

Slide24

Total activity by date joined

24

Slide25

Total activity by date joined

25

Slide26

ARL vs Our StudyWhy might the numbers differ?

Institutions with multiple libraries and with complex ILL set-up’s might not have reported all activity to us.

Both sets of data are self-reported, and possibly compiled by different people. Potential fiscal/calendar confusion

Overall, study participants reported 97.9% of what was reported to ARL.

26

Slide27

% ARL Numbers Reported to Us

27

Slide28

% ARL Reported, by “Era” Group

28

Slide29

Do you net lend or borrow, trend up or down?All 11 BD institutions

Venue

2010201120122013Overall

BD

OCLC

Rapid

Docline

Other

29

= Net borrower

= Net lender

Trending up from previous year

Trending down from previous year

Slide30

Do you net lend or borrow, trend up or down?3 “founding” institutions

Venue

2010201120122013Overall

BD

OCLC

Rapid

Docline

Other

30

= Net borrower

= Net lender

Trending up from previous year

Trending down from previous year

Slide31

Do you net lend or borrow, trend up or down?4 “joined in 2002” institutions

Venue

2010201120122013Overall

BD

OCLC

Rapid

Docline

Other

31

= Net borrower

= Net lender

Trending up from previous year

Trending down from previous year

Slide32

Do you net lend or borrow, trend up or down?4 “newbie” institutions

Venue

2010201120122013Overall

BD----

OCLC

Rapid

Docline

Other

32

= Net borrower

= Net lender

Trending up from previous year

Trending down from previous year

Slide33

What comes next…

Slide34

Next StepsIndividual profiles for all 11 institutions

Look for cause and effectSeek insight into strategic thinkingBreak down returnables versus nonreturnablesLook at fill ratesTrack reciprocal interactions via OCLC ILL

Report out genericallyReport to BD cohort in detailRepeat study with CIC (this time with POD)

34

Slide35

Are we there Yet(i)?

Slide36

Questions?

Comments?

36

Slide37

Thanks for participating!

Dennis Massiemassied@ococ.org