/
Black, White or Grey: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Black, White or Grey: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and

Black, White or Grey: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
432 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-12

Black, White or Grey: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and - PPT Presentation

SolutionFocused Courts Hon Peggy Fulton Hora Judge of the Superior Court of California Ret Community Legal Centres Tasmania 1415 November 2013 Judge Sonia Sotomayor a judge with empathy and heart ID: 648599

drug court prison courts court drug courts prison justice treatment population prisoners therapeutic youth collaborative day services solution mental

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Black, White or Grey: Therapeutic Jurisp..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Black, White or Grey:Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Solution-Focused Courts

Hon. Peggy Fulton Hora

Judge of the Superior Court of California (Ret.)

Community Legal Centres Tasmania

14-15 November 2013Slide2

Judge Sonia Sotomayor, a judge with “empathy” and “heart.”

“The safe thing to do is to sit on the bench and administer justice. The risky thing to do is to balance mercy with justice, compassion with rules.” Judge Juanita StedmanSlide3

Therapeutic JurisprudenceCan we reduce the anti-therapeutic consequences

Enhance the therapeutic ones

Without subordinating due process and other justice values?

Slobogin

, Christopher, “Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Five Dilemmas to Ponder

,”

1

Psychology Public Policy and the Law

193 (1995)Slide4

Therapeutic Jurisprudence (TJ) in the Justice Setting

Can we enhance the likelihood of desired outcomes and compliance with judicial orders by applying what we know about behavior to the way we do business in courtSlide5

Comprehensive Law Movement

Seeks to maximize emotional, psychological and relational wellbeing of those involved with legal matters

Focuses beyond strict legal rights,

responsibilities, duties, obligations and entitleme

nts

Daicoff, Susan, “Law as a Healing Profession: The ‘Comprehensive Law Movement’,”

6

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

1 (2006)Slide6

Collaborative Judges

Judges believe they can and should play a role in the problem-solving process

Outcomes matter--court is not just based on a process and precedent

Adelaide Thinker in Residence

Adapted from Judge Judith S. Kaye, Former Chief Judge, New York Slide7

Collaborative CourtsRecognize the therapeutic potential of the court’s coercive powersFinds “Judicial Leverage” is an appropriate tool

Adelaide Thinker in ResidenceSlide8

Collaborative ChangeSlide9

P-S Principles and Methods

Reduce recidivism in criminal cases

Save incarceration and other costs of social services, e.g., foster care

Have great public support

High participant satisfaction (procedural justice)

High judicial satisfactionSlide10

What’s in a name?Drug courtDrug treatment court

Sobriety court

DWI court

Healing-to-Wellness court

Family treatment court

Collaborative court (CA)

Non-Adversarial Justice (HI)Slide11

Solution-Focused Courts in Australia

The processes the court uses to develop solutions--therapeutic, inclusive of participants and the court team--and in the concept of the solution that is being sought--addressing underlying issues and promoting an ability to lead a constructive, happy and law-abiding life in the community.

Michael

King,“Solution

-Focused Judging Benchbook,” Monash U. ,Melbourne AU (2009)Slide12

Shared Principles of Collaborative Courts (CA)Problem-solving focusProactive judicial role

Less adversarial, team approach

Integration of tx and social services

Enhanced access to informationSlide13

Ongoing judicial supervisionUse of sanctions and incentivesDirect interaction between litigants and judgeCommunity outreach

Adapted from “Components of Collaborative Justice Courts,” Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts,

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/programs/collab/background.htm

Slide14

“Tough on Crime”

State prison population up 700% over 1970-2010Slide15

Three Strikes in CaliforniaViolent felony“Serious” felony

Third strike =

any

felony including “wobblers”

25 years to life

Modified last year. Change supported by prison guards’ unionSlide16

When jail is the only answer:

U.S. jail and prison population is 2.3 million as of 2008

Four times population of Tasmania

5% of the world’s population; 25-50% prisoners

“Life After Prison Can Be Deadly, a Study Finds,”

The New York Times,

Jan. 11, 2007 p. A23

“Inmate Count in U.S. Dwarfs Other Nations’,”

The New York Times, April 23, 2008 p. 1

“U.S. Prison Population Rises Despite a Drop in 20 States,” NYTimes Dec. 9, 2009 p. A22Slide17

1:133 Americans incarcerated

In 2009, 5.1 million

(1: 45) adults in the United States—was under some form of criminal justice supervision in the communitySlide18

Disparate Impact1:4 young, African American men incarcerated, on parole or probation

91% of Louisiana prisoners serving LWOP

for non-violent

crimes are African AmericanSlide19

Largest mental hospital in U.S.?

Los Angeles County Jail with 3,000 MI inmates every day

Earley, Pete

, Crazy: A Father's Search Through America's Mental Health Madness

(Putnam, 2006)Slide20

Inmates with mental illness30% of California’s prison population has a mental illnessAbout the population of Darwin

Prison costs in California

U.S.$8.6

billion annuallySlide21

Tasmanian prisoners?

They are overwhelmingly young, male, poorly educated, unemployed and have high rates of mental illness, substance abuse, disability and chronic disease.

About 1,700 people per yearSlide22

Australian Institute of Criminology Drug Use Monitoring in Australia

Arrestees with “heavy alcohol” abuse (>5 drinks/day) ¾ men and 2/3 women

Alcohol abusers also tested positive

for other drugs

(65%) and about ¼ (23%) tested positive for two or more drugs

At time of arrest 48% of offenders were positive for drugs and 15% were looking for drugsSlide23

Tasmanian prisoner profile

>60% of those entering prison identify

alcohol and other drugs

as a significant contributor to their offending

~75% of prisoners have a substance abuse and

co-occurring mental health disorder

Ten separate prison admissions is not uncommon

Dr. Frances Donaldson, Risdon Prison ClinicSlide24

ATOD use + MH problems =

98.5%

o

f Tasmanian prisoners

Correctional Primary Health ServicesSlide25

Cost of prison in Tasmania$307 per day$112,000 per year per prisonerSlide26

Daily costsRisdon Prison $307/day

Hotel Grand Chancellor $250/day

Risdon Prison $307/day Henry Jones Art Hotel $289/daySlide27

Disproportionate impact

Indigenous population 13-15% in prison

General population 3.5%

U.S. drug courts credited with reducing the imbalance of African Americans in the prison populationSlide28

What’s the Answer?

“We need to incarcerate the offenders we are afraid of and treat the ones we are just mad at.”Slide29

Recidivism and drugs“…[E]xpectation of post-release drug use was a significant predictor of re-incarceration”

Payne, Jason, Macgregor, Sarah, McDonald, Haley, “Prevalence and Issues Relating to Cannabis Use among Prison Inmates: Key Findings from Australian Research Since 2001 ,National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre (

NCPIC

), 2013.Slide30

Outcomes of incarcerationExpensiveIneffectiveNot a general deterrent

More than 1/3 (39%) of Australian prisoners re-arrested and re-incarcerated 2 years after releaseSlide31

Conversation is changingThe proportion of Australians who agree that “stiffer sentences are needed” has declined

Little or no confidence in the prison system’s ability to:

Rehabilitate prisoners (88%)

Punish (59%)

Teach prisoners skills (64%)

L.Roberts

, D

Indermaur

,

What Australians think about crime and justice results from the 2007 Survey of Social Attitudes, Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) 2007Slide32

Costs of misuseTangible costs of alcohol and illicit drugs in AU =

AU$19 Billion

DJ Collins, HM

Lapsley

, The costs of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug abuse to Australia society in 2004-05, Commonwealth of Australia, 2006Slide33

Little change in prisonEXCEPT:Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre

Focuses on treatment and recovery

2006 NSW Drug Court, Justice Health Services and Dept. of Corrective ServicesSlide34
Slide35

Reintegration planningSupportive environmentClean and sober housing

Outpatient chemical dependence treatment

Ancillary servicesSlide36

Addiction

“When you can quit, you don’t want to and when you want to, you can’t

Casper (Geoffrey Rush)

in “Candy” (2006)Slide37

Solution-Focused Courts AUSlide38

International Perspective on Drug Courts

Australia

England Panama

Canada El Salvador

Scotland Ecuador

Ireland Mariturius

New Zealand Netherlands

Costa Rica

Chile Israel

Argentina Italy

Trinidad and Tobago

Caribbean Dominican Republic

Belgium Bahamas

Macedonia Japan

Brazil Vietnam

Norway

Wales

Mexico

PlannedSlide39

UN Office of Drug Control

13 Key Principles for Court-directed Treatment and Rehabilitation Programmes Slide40

Drug Treatment Courts AUFirst in 1999 Parramatta NSW2 more in NSW

4

th

in planning stage in Wollongong

In all states or territories except QLD

2007 Tasmania – Court Mandated Drug Diversion ProgramSlide41
Slide42

Other solution-focused courtsMental health list/court

First 2000 Adelaide

Tasmania - Hobart, Launceston,

Burnie

and Devonport

Aboriginal sentencing

Nunga Court in Adelaide

Koori Court in Melbourne

Youth treatment court ACT

Neighbourhood

Justice Centre, VictoriaSlide43

Family Drug Treatment Court VICJanuary 2014Slide44

Specialised Youth Justice Court PilotHobart

Improved timeliness to

finalisation

of youth justice matters

Encouragement of more consistency in the court’s decisions

Greater development and application of expertise in youth justice matters

Better coordination of youth justice support services to the court

Increased collaborative approaches between the agencies involved in youth justice.

Achieved all but first goal

Will expand to Launceston in 2014

No Family Treatment Court in TasmaniaSlide45

Two steps forward, …

NSW closed Youth Drug and Alcohol Court (July 2012)

Queensland closed Murri Court, Special Circumstances and Drug Treatment Courts

(But allowed “Indigenous Sentencing List “)

Claimed fiscal concerns

Drug Court in QLD saved

AU$6

million

yearSlide46
Slide47

“Mr Cranny said the court was attempting to fill the gap of the drug and specialised courts, which had been scrapped by the Newman Government.”Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie

said the program was not offered to serious offenders.

"We are an unashamedly tough Government, but we also support our most vulnerable,'' Mr

Bleijie

told

The Courier-Mail

.Slide48
Slide49

Support from the right“Conservatives

favor voluntary drug courts

because they provide options for those people who are sincerely committed to taking responsibility to reform their lives.”

“The reduced recidivism rates that result from the use of drug courts

benefit public safety

, but drug courts can also

reduce the burden of incarceration

on state budgets because they cost less—between $2,500 and $4,000 annually per offender.”Slide50

Drug Treatment Courts in the U.S.Slide51

2,833 Drug Courts in U.S. (1-10-13)

321

Family

127 Tribal

129

State

Vets

221

DWI

600+ hybrid

5

Federal

Vets

459

Juvenile

1,474

Adult

39

Co-Occurring

30

Re-Entry

5

Campus

25

Federal

District

CourtsSlide52

~1,300 Other P-S CourtsSlide53

Characteristics82% criminal courts are post-plea140,000 participants nationwide

1.2 million eligible but not servedSlide54

Efficacy – Adult Drug CourtReduce substance use by >35%Reduce crime by 50%

Reduce recidivism -- 75% graduates are arrest free; crime reduction remains >14 yearsSlide55

Cost Savings11 meta analyses show:$1 = $2.21 - $3.36 savings

Up to $27 per dollar invested if all costs are counted

Family Drug Court saves $10-15,000 per childSlide56

What can you do?

Develop partnerships with the drug diversion court and mental health list

Support and promote their work

Encourage the development of other solution-focused courts:

Supreme court, post conviction, more serious crimes

Community supervision

Drink/drug driving court

Family treatment court

Integrated youth courtSlide57

Comments? Questions?