/
Does consideration of global or regional change alter our p Does consideration of global or regional change alter our p

Does consideration of global or regional change alter our p - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
402 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-08

Does consideration of global or regional change alter our p - PPT Presentation

Image clipped from Gledhill et al 2015 A t the boundaries Wind Sea surface temperature Precipitation and salinity Carbonate chemistry Dissolved oxygen Nutrients Should we treat ID: 310849

salinity model cells ctochl model salinity ctochl cells rphyt 361 224 724 likelihood chlorophyll phytoplankton state models oxygen size

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Does consideration of global or regional..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Does consideration of global or regional change alter our prediction of ecosystem response to nutrient abatement?

Image clipped from Gledhill et al 2015

A

t the boundaries

Wind

Sea surface temperature

Precipitation and salinity

Carbonate chemistry

Dissolved oxygen?

Nutrients?Slide2

Should we treat regional trends simply as boundary changes?

Working backwards from field data, can formal inverse modeling sort out changes in the biology of the system

How do we address the inevitable need to compare models or evaluate the benefit of a new state variable (e.g., grazers)?Slide3

Gledhill et al 2015

ARAGONITE SATURATION STATESlide4

Gledhill et al 2015 and NOAA NFSC

SALINITYSlide5

Wallace et al. 2014

Narragansett Bay, 2013

Metabolic CO

2

(and Reduced Buffering ?)Slide6

Salinity (

psu

)

---- Lower

---- Upper

NuShuttleSlide7

Does any of this matter for predicting ecosystem response?

Consider carbon to chlorophyll ratios Key parameter in water quality models Current best estimate is based on algal monocultures

And is therefore sensitive to…

Things that alter community structure

e.g., salinity, temperature, grazing, nutrients, light, carbonate chemistry

C:Chl is determined by….

phytoplankton community structure (not predictable from monocultures)

e.g., cell size-abundance, species abundance

Slide8

Grear, Rynearson, Montalbano,

Govenar

and Menden-Deuer,

submitted

S

ize-abundance spectra of incubated whole plankton communities from Narragansett Bay

224

uatm

p

CO

2

361

uatm

p

CO

2

724

uatm

p

CO

2

Shift toward smaller cells

Shift toward smaller cells

No

change

RI STACSlide9

Grear, Rynearson, Montalbano,

Govenar

and Menden-Deuer,

submitted

Pre

224

361

724

Pre

224

361

724

Pre

224

361

724

Small Cells

Medium Cells

Large Cells

Each size class affected differently by

p

CO

2Slide10
Slide11

Fixed water quality model parameters that may change annually or

decadally: CtoChl Carbon to chlorophyll ratio K0 light attenuation due to phytoplankton

BR Benthic remineralization Rphyt River phytoplankton load

Others?

WHAT ABOUT THE MODELS?Slide12

What value of

θ maximizes the likelihood, given the 2006 nushuttle data,

the 2006 physics, and the rest of the WQ model ?

Fixed water quality model parameters that may change annually or

decadally

:

θ

= {

CtoChl

, K0, BR,

Rphyt

}

Does this model:

θ

= {

CtoChl

A

,CtoChl

B

, K0, BR,

Rphyt}, improve fit (likelihood) without adding variance?Slide13

Corrected Chlorophyll (ug

L

-1)

---- Lower

---- UpperSlide14

Dissolved Oxygen (mg L

-1

)

---- Lower

---- UpperSlide15

θ

= {CtoChl, K0, BR, Rphyt}Use of likelihood methods requires joint probability model.Bayes methods provide a workaround, by sampling the joint posterior probability.

Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods “randomly walk” through the joint space and “sniff out” the peak in the likelihood.

y

x

z

Parameter hyperspace

i.e., state variable

i

(DO,

Chl

a) in segment

j

on day

t

Observations:Slide16
Slide17

Each stop (> 10

4) in the random walk requires a full annual simulationCoded ODE in C8 days on a Linux with parallel processors (very tricky with MCMC)

FUTURE DIRECTIONS:I would like to use correct initial conditions, boundary fluxes, and both GEM and OBM-based exchangesNeed a geospatial model of observations for better linkage to WQ model (parse out observation and process error).Slide18

EPA ATLANTIC ECOLOGY DIVISION

Bay Ecosystem Time Series (BETS)

MonthlyTemperatureSalinity

Dissolved oxygen

Nutrients

Chlorophyll

Total suspended solids

Carbonate chemistry

Stable

isotopes

Contact: Autumn OczkowskiSlide19

NuShuttle

Salinity

1998

2004

2010

J F M A M J

J

A S O N DSlide20
Slide21

Ullman, D. S., and D. L.

Codiga

http://www.crmc.ri.gov/samp