/
OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM

OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
354 views
Uploaded On 2018-09-30

OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM - PPT Presentation

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Staci Gatica gaticastaciepagov US Licensing System amp Enforcement Activity 2 Presentation Topics Mechanics of US Licensing System and Phaseout Focus on Imports ID: 683356

ods epa illegal import epa ods import illegal customs enforcement allowances hcfc case petition system trade protection investigation criminal

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "OCTOBER 5, 2011 MAIN MEETING OF OZONE AC..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

OCTOBER 5, 2011

MAIN MEETING OF OZONE ACTION NETWORKS FROM LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEANStaci Gatica gatica.staci@epa.gov

U.S Licensing System

&

Enforcement ActivitySlide2

2

Presentation TopicsMechanics of U.S. Licensing System and PhaseoutFocus on Imports

Used vs. virgin ODS

Petition process

Collaboration to Identify Illegal Activity

Enforcement of Regulations

Recent Illegal Trade

Other Types of ViolationsSlide3

US EPA Stratospheric Ozone Program OfficeSlide4

U.S. Licensing System to Ensure Compliance

Licenses (“allowances”) needed to produce or import bulk HCFCs“Baselines” established for individual companies effective in 2003 (production & consumption)

Baselines based on historical consumption data of each company

Goal: Avoid disruption of existing market

Current phaseout approach: Baseline allowances reduced proportionately via regulation to implement and domestic regulations and Protocol goals

Also a “worst first” phaseout approach

“Exemptions” needed for CFCs, MeBr and other phased-out ODS

4Slide5

5

HCFC Allowance ExpenditureProduction Allowances

Consumption

Allowances

Domestic Production =

1 consumption +

1 production allowance for

each kg produced in U.S.

Import =

1 consumption allowance for

each kg imported in the U.S.

1 allowance = 1 kg of chemicalSlide6

Trade of Allowances

Allowances are tradable between companies and between chemicals

Trades allow new entrants into the HCFC market

EPA must be notified of trade

EPA must process request within 3 days, or it happens automatically

EPA notification is very important

EPA should at ALL times know what companies have allowances to import ODS

6Slide7

7

Total Projected R-22 Servicing Demand & EPA’s 2010-2014 Initially Developed Allocations of HCFC-22

Projected Unmet Need for R-22

Implementation of HCFC Phaseout

Next major milestone under Montreal Protocol: 90% HCFC reduction from 2003 baseline by 2015Slide8

ODS Tracking System (ODSTS)

Collect CBI data from about 80 companiesODSTS contains significant data from reports (i.e., producer, importer, exporter, destruction, transformation, etc.)

Electronic templates for major reports

The ODSTS tracks allowances to ensure compliance under Protocol

Balance statements (per transaction)

All trades contained in the system

ODSTS analyzes data and produces reports (i.e., Article 7 for UNEP)

E-Reporting

Templates

HARD COPY FORMS

Ozone Depleting Substance Tracking System (ODSTS)

Data Summary Reports

8Slide9

9

Maintaining Tracking and Reporting Data Continuity

E-Reporting

Templates

Hard Copy Forms

ODS

Tracking System

Data Summary ReportsSlide10

10

Recordkeeping & Reporting RequirementsFound in 40 CFR part 82.13 and 82.24Production, Import and Exports reported quarterlyA variety of other forms exist (i.e., destruction)

25+ reporting forms (

http://www.epa.gov/ozone/record)

Class I

Class II

Methyl Bromide

Reporting forms are always changing as regulations change due to phaseout

Guidance for reporting entities

Stakeholder input is helpful to form developmentSlide11

Focus on Imports

Virgin ODS

Used ODS

For Use

Consumption Allowances

Exemption Allowances

Trades of Allowances tracked by EPA

-Petition to EPA

Non-objection Letter

NOL must accompany shipment through customs

For Destruction or Transformation

No need for Allowances

No pre-notification

SPD typically receives voluntary notification for phased out ODS (i.e., CFC)

Petition to EPA for material being destroyed

NOL or Acknowledgement Letter

* N/A for Transformation

11Slide12

Importing Used ODS –

Petition ProcessImport petition required for shipments over 5 pounds

Petition contains a number of informational elements

Purpose: to help EPA determine that the material is in fact, used

Petition must be submitted to EPA at least 40 before shipment is to leave port of export

EPA will investigate source information

EPA mails or faxes either an objection (non-approval) or non-objection (approval) letter to petitioner

Petition and non-objection letter must accompany shipment through U.S. Customs

12Slide13

Importing Virgin ODS

CFCsCustoms typically stops import of virgin CFCsCall EPA on a case-by-case basisSuch imports are rare

HCFCs

EPA worked with Customs to put a criteria hit into their Automated Commercial System (ACS) database

A comprehensive system that tracks, controls, and processes commercial goods imported into the U.S

Customs is told to contact EPA to confirm import of HCFCs into the U.S.

EPA is available 24-hour via cell phone to work with Customs

EPA verifies against ODSTS

Any illegal activity is referred to Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance – civil and criminal divisions

13Slide14

Customs/EPA Process to Combat

Illegal Trade

STOP!

Customs Inspector stops shipment because of HTS criteria hit

Customs Inspector calls EPA to check on clearance

EPA checks whether shipment is legal

EPA calls Customs to clear shipment for import or ask them to seize it

14Slide15

Sharing Information & Intelligence

Network! Customs and Border Protection specific training and conferencesJoint EPA/Criminal Investigation Division and CBP “sting” operationEPA bi-annual regional conference

Communicate!

EPA holds monthly conference calls with our Regional EPA contacts on enforcement issues

Quarterly information exchange with stakeholders (i.e., Alliance) to get “tips” in illegal activity

Leverage Resources!

Work with our Office of Enforcement and Compliance here at EPA to get access to Customs and Border Protection import entry data to analyze against our ODSTS (ODS tracking system)

15Slide16

Questions

thus

far

?

16Slide17

17

Enforcement of ODS RegulationTwo general types of enforcement actionsCivil and criminalCriminal – must show intent by defendant to break the law

Ultimate penalties vary – fines, community service, probation, imprisonment

The Stratospheric Protection Division (SPD)

“Program office” does not enforce regulations

EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance (OECA) have enforcement authority over our regulations

Great coordination between SPD and OECA

Mindset – always aim to maintain that coordination

Try to prepare for rise in illegal activity

Details of investigation are maintained in OECA Intelligence gathered via research, tips, inspections and online reporting, international collaboration http://www.epa.gov/compliance/

(click on the badge in the corner)Slide18

Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade

Lateral InvestmentsOn July 29, 2011, Brendan Clery was sentenced to 18 months in prison for illegally importing HCFC-22, contrary to the provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In addition, he was ordered to pay a $40,000 criminal fine and forfeit illegal proceeds in the amount of $935,240. Between June and August 2007, Clery illegally smuggled into the United States approximately 278,256 kilograms, or 20,460 cylinders, of restricted HCFC-22, with a market value of $1,438,270. At no time did Clery or his company Lateral Investments hold unexpended consumption allowances that would have allowed them to legally import the refrigerant.

Facts about the case:

Cleary created import business in Florida with intent to import illegal refrigerant, among other items

The product came from China

This case of part of a larger criminal investigation known as “Operation Catch-22”

Investigation team: Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Criminal Investigation Bureau, and prosecuted by special assistant U. S. Attorney Jodi A. Mazer

18Slide19

Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade

Harp USA, Inc.On February 11, 2011, Harp USA Inc. (Harp), a Florida corporation, pled guilty and was sentenced today in connection with false statements made in entry documents for the importation of used HCFC-22 refrigerant. Harp’s plea included admittance to importing approximately 1,874 cylinders (approx 25,000 kg) into the U.S. using false invoices and statements resulting in three years of probation and a $206,140 criminal fine. Harp was also ordered to perform community service by making a $25,000 payment to the Southern Environmental Enforcement Training Fund, a not-for-profit training organization. In addition, as a special condition of probation, Harp was ordered to implement and enforce an Environmental Compliance Plan and to reimburse the government for costs associated with the storage and handling of the merchandise

.

Facts about the case:

The product came from the UK – claimed refrigerant was used

The petition that was submitted to EPA was reviewed and a “non objection letter” provided

Upon further review and before the shipment arrived, EPA realized the petition contained false statements

EPA regulations (82.24(c)(4)(vi) state that if new information is found after a non-objection letter is provided that indicate false information, then EPA can take enforcment action

Investigation team: Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Criminal Investigation Bureau, Miami-Dade Police Department and prosecuted by special assistant U. S. Attorney Jodi A. Mazer

This is the US’s first prosecution for false statements contained in a petition to import used ODS

19Slide20

Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade

Correa, Falcon, Nova, and UrenaOn October 20, 2010, John Correa, Abdiel Falcon, Charles Nova, and Blasdimir Urena each pled guilty to the felony charge of violating 18 USC 545 for importing merchandise (23,079 kg of HCFC-22 with a FMV of approximately $257,944) contrary to the CAA in that they did not hold unexpended consumption allowances. Sentencing for all 4 defendants was scheduled for December 29, 2010. Results: 1-5 years of probation, storage and destruction fees.

Facts about the case:

The HCFC-22 was Chinese manufactured

The HCFC-22 was sent to the DR - we do not know if the import was legal or illegal. We do not know how it got to the DR.

We know the defendants “learned the smuggle scheme” from someone; we do not know who taught them.

Investigation team: Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Criminal Investigation Bureau, and prosecuted by special assistant U. S. Attorney Jodi A. Mazer

20Slide21

Recent Case Studies on Illegal Trade

Kroy Corporation and James Garrido On February 11, 2010 James Garrido and Kroy Corporation were each sentenced today by U.S. District Court Judge Patricia A. Seitz. Garrido was sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by three years of supervised release. Kroy Corporation was sentenced to five years of probation. Additionally, Garrido and Kroy were sentenced, jointly and severally, to pay a criminal fine of $40,000, and were further ordered to forfeit $1,356,160 to the United States.

Facts about the case:

The HCFC- was produced in China

The HCFC-22 was sent to the Dominican Republic (DR) - we do not know if the import into DR was legal or illegal

The shipment

was not defined as a transshipment

Multi-Agency team received a 2010 U.S. EPA Montreal Protocol Award

Team: EPA Region 4, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice

21Slide22

22

Other Types of ViolationsIllegal trade (imports) is only one type of violationOther types include improper management of ODS:Venting Improper disposal techniquesServicing by a technician without certification from an approved certification program

Selling ODS to uncertified technician

Failure to repair leaks

Tax evasion (CFC tax)

http://www.epa.gov/ozone/enforce/Slide23

Questions

?

23Slide24

Information on Alternatives

http://www.epa.gov/ozone/intpol/mpagreement.html

24