Operations Management Dr Ron Lembke Designed Size 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Natural Variation 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ID: 588412
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Statistical Process Control" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Statistical Process Control
Operations Management
Dr.
Ron
LembkeSlide2
Designed Size
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Slide3
Natural Variation
14.5 14.6 14.7 14.8 14.9 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3
15.4Slide4
Theoretical Basis of Control Charts
95.5% of all
X fall within ± 2
Properties of normal distributionSlide5
Theoretical Basis of Control Charts
Properties of normal distribution
99.7% of all
X fall within ± 3
Slide6
Skewness
Lack of symmetry
Pearson’s coefficient of skewness:
Skewness = 0
Negative Skew < 0
Positive Skew > 0Slide7
Kurtosis
Amount of peakedness or flatness
Kurtosis < 0
Kurtosis > 0
Kurtosis = 0Slide8
Heteroskedasticity
Sub-groups with different variancesSlide9
Design Tolerances
Design tolerance:
Determined by users’ needs
USL -- Upper Specification Limit
LSL -- Lower Specification LimitEg: specified size +/- 0.005 inchesNo connection between tolerance and
completely unrelated to natural variation.Slide10
Process Capability
LSL
USL
LSL
USL
Capable
LSL
USL
LSL
USL
Not Capable
Slide11
Process Capability
Specs: 1.5 +/- 0.01
Mean: 1.505 Std. Dev. = 0.002
Are we in trouble?Slide12
Process Capability
Specs: 1.5 +/- 0.01
LSL
= 1.5 – 0.01 = 1.49
USL = 1.5 + 0.01 = 1.51Mean: 1.505 Std. Dev. = 0.002LCL = 1.505 - 3*0.002 = 1.499UCL = 1.505 + 0.006 = 1.511
1.499
1.51
1.49
1.511
Process
SpecsSlide13
Capability Index
Capability Index (
C
p) will tell the position of the control limits relative to the design specifications.C
p>= 1.0, process is capableCp< 1.0, process is not capableSlide14
Process Capability, Cp
Tells how well parts produced fit into specs
Process
Specs
3
3
LSL
USLSlide15
Process Capability
Tells how well parts produced fit into specs
For our example:
C
p
=0.02/0.012 = 1.667 1.667>1.0 Process not capableSlide16
Packaged Goods
What are the Tolerance Levels?
What we have to do to measure capability?
What are the sources of variability?Slide17
Production Process
Make Candy
Package
Put in big bags
Make Candy
Make Candy
Make Candy
Make Candy
Make Candy
Mix
Mix %
Candy irregularity
Wrong wt.
Wrong wt.Slide18
Processes Involved
Candy Manufacturing:
Are M&Ms uniform size & weight?
Should be easier with plain than peanut
Percentage of broken items (probably from printing)Mixing: Is proper color mix in each bag?Individual packages:Are same # put in each package?
Is same weight put in each package?Large bags:Are same number of packages put in each bag?Is same weight put in each bag?Slide19
Weighing Package and all candies
Before placing candy on scale, press “ON/TARE” button
Wait for 0.00 to appear
If it doesn’t say “g”, press Cal/Mode button a few times
Write weight down on formSlide20
Candy colors
Write Name on form
Write weight on form
Write Package # on form
Count # of each color and write on formCount total # of candies and write on form
(Advanced only): Eat candiesTurn in forms and complete wrappersSlide21Slide22
Peanut Candy Weights
Avg. 2.18, stdv 0.242, c.v. = 0.111Slide23
Plain Candy Weights
Avg 0.858, StDev 0.035, C.V. 0.0413 Slide24
Peanut Color Mix
website
Brown 17.7% 20%
Yellow 8.2% 20%Red 9.5% 20%
Blue 15.4% 20%Orange 26.4% 10%Green 22.7% 10%Slide25
Class website
Brown 12.1% 30%
Yellow 14.7% 20%
Red 11.4% 20%
Blue 19.5% 10%Orange 21.2% 10%Green 21.2% 10%
Plain Color MixSlide26
So who cares?
Dept. of Commerce
National Institutes of Standards & Technology
NIST Handbook 133Fair Packaging and Labeling ActSlide27
Acceptable?Slide28Slide29
Package Weight
“Not Labeled for Individual Retail Sale”
If individual is 18g
MAV is 10% = 1.8gNothing can be below 18g – 1.8g = 16.2g Slide30
Goal of Control Charts
See if process is “in control”
Process should show random values
No trends or unlikely patterns
Visual representation much easier to interpretTables of data – any patterns?Spot trends, unlikely patterns easilySlide31
NFL Control Chart?Slide32
Control Charts
UCL
LCL
avg
Values
Sample NumberSlide33
Definitions of Out of Control
No points outside control limits
Same number above & below center line
Points seem to fall randomly above and below center line
Most are near the center line, only a few are close to control limits8 Consecutive pts on one side of centerline
2 of 3 points in outer third4 of 5 in outer two-thirds regionSlide34
Control Charts
Normal
Too Low
Too high
5 above, or below
Run of 5
Extreme variabilitySlide35
Control
Charts
UCL
LCL
avg
1
σ
2
σ
2
σ
1
σSlide36
Control Charts
2 out of 3 in the outer thirdSlide37
Out of Control Point?
Is there an “assignable cause?”
Or day-to-day variability?
If not usual variability, GET IT OUT
Remove data point from data set, and recalculate control limitsIf it is regular, day-to-day variability, LEAVE IT IN
Include it when calculating control limitsSlide38
Attributes vs. Variables
Attributes:
Good / bad, works / doesn’t
count % bad (P chart)
count # defects / item (C chart)Variables:measure length, weight, temperature (x-bar chart)measure variability in length (R chart)Slide39
NormalitySlide40
R Chart
Type of variables control chart
Interval or ratio scaled numerical data
Shows sample ranges over time
Difference between smallest & largest values in inspection sampleMonitors variability in processExample: Weigh samples of coffee & compute ranges of samples; PlotSlide41
You’re manager of a 500-room hotel. You want to analyze the time it takes to deliver luggage to the room. For 7 days, you collect data on
5
deliveries per day. Is the
process in control
?Hotel ExampleSlide42
Hotel Data
Day
Delivery Time
1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 2 4.60 8.70 7.60 4.43 7.62 3 5.98 2.92 6.20 4.20 5.10
4 7.20 5.10 5.19 6.80 4.21 5 4.00 4.50 5.50 1.89 4.46 6 10.10 8.10 6.50 5.06 6.94 7 6.77 5.08 5.90 6.90 9.30Slide43
Mean and Range - Hotel
Data
Sample
Day
Delivery Time Mean Range
1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32
7.30 + 4.20 + 6.10 + 3.45 + 5.55
5
Sample Mean = Slide44
R &
X
Chart Hotel Data
Sample
Day Delivery Time
Mean Range 1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 3.85
7.30 - 3.45
Sample Range =
Largest
SmallestSlide45
Hotel Data – Mean and Range
Sample
Day
Delivery Time Mean Range
1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 3.85 2 4.60 8.70 7.60 4.43 7.62 6.59 4.27 3 5.98 2.92 6.20 4.20 5.10 4.88 3.28
4 7.20 5.10 5.19 6.80 4.21 5.70 2.99 5 4.00 4.50 5.50 1.89 4.46 4.07 3.61 6 10.10 8.10 6.50 5.06 6.94 7.34 5.04 7 6.77 5.08 5.90 6.90 9.30 6.79 4.22Slide46
X
Chart Control Limits
Sample Range at Time
i
# Samples
Sample Mean at Time
iSlide47
X
Chart Control Limits
A
2 from
Figure 13.10Slide48
Figure 13.10 Limits
Sample
Size (n)
A2
D4
D52
1.8803.273
1.0202.57
40.7302.28
50.580
2.1160.48
02.0070.42
0.081.928
0.37
0.14
1.86
9
0.34
0.18
1.82
10
0.31
0.22
1.78
11
0.29
0.26
1.74Slide49
R &
X
Chart Hotel Data
Sample
Day Delivery Time Mean Range
1 7.30 4.20 6.10 3.45 5.55 5.32 3.85 2 4.60 8.70 7.60 4.43 7.62 6.59 4.27
3 5.98 2.92 6.20 4.20 5.10 4.88 3.28 4 7.20 5.10 5.19 6.80 4.21 5.70 2.99 5 4.00 4.50 5.50 1.89 4.46 4.07 3.61 6 10.10 8.10 6.50 5.06 6.94 7.34 5.04 7 6.77 5.08 5.90 6.90 9.30 6.79 4.22Slide50
X
Chart Control LimitsSlide51
X
Chart Solution*
0
2
4
6
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
`
X, Minutes
Day
UCL
LCLSlide52
R Chart Control Limits
Sample Range at Time
i
# Samples
Figure 13.10,
p.402Slide53
Figure 13.10 Limits
Sample
Size (n)
A2
D4
D521.88
03.2731.02
02.574
0.7302.285
0.5802.11
60.480
2.0070.420.08
1.9280.37
0.14
1.86
9
0.34
0.18
1.82
10
0.31
0.22
1.78
11
0.29
0.26
1.74Slide54
R
Chart Control LimitsSlide55
R
Chart Solution
UCLSlide56
Attribute Control Charts
Tell us whether points in tolerance or not
p chart: percentage with given characteristic (usually whether defective or not)
np chart: number of units with characteristicc chart: count # of occurrences in a fixed area of opportunity (defects per car)
u chart: # of events in a changeable area of opportunity (sq. yards of paper drawn from a machine)Slide57
p Chart Control Limits
# Defective Items in Sample i
Sample i
Size
# Samples
z
= 2 for 95.5% limits;
z
= 3 for 99.7% limitsSlide58
p Chart Example
You’re manager of a
1,700 room
hotel.
For 7 days, you collect data on the readiness of all of the rooms that someone checked out of. Is the process in control
(use z = 3)?
© 1995 Corel Corp.Slide59
p Chart Hotel Data
# Rooms
No.
Not Proportion
Day n
Ready p 1
1,300 130 130/1,300 =.100 2 800 90
.113 3 400 21 .053 4
350 25 .071 5 300 18
.06 6 400 12 .03
7 600 30 .05Slide60
p Chart Control LimitsSlide61
p Chart SolutionSlide62
Hotel Room Readiness P-Bar