1312 1310 UBICOMP 14 ADJUNCT SEPTEMBER 13 17 2014 SEATTLE WA USA 1309 WORKSHOP UPSIDE 1308 UBICOMP 14 ADJUNCT SEPTEMBER 13 17 2014 SEATTLE WA USA 1311 WORKSHOP UPSIDE 1307 UBICOMP 1 ID: 309265
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "UBICOMP '14 ADJUNCT, SEPTEMBER 13 - 17, ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1312 UBICOMP '14 ADJUNCT, SEPTEMBER 13 - 17, 2014, SEATTLE, WA, USA 1310 UBICOMP '14 ADJUNCT, SEPTEMBER 13 - 17, 2014, SEATTLE, WA, USA 1309 WORKSHOP: UPSIDE 1308 UBICOMP '14 ADJUNCT, SEPTEMBER 13 - 17, 2014, SEATTLE, WA, USA 1311 WORKSHOP: UPSIDE 1307 UBICOMP '14 ADJUNCT, SEPTEMBER 13 - 17, 2014, SEATTLE, WA, USA facingintheirdailylives.Forexample,Autographer[1]isalightweightcamerathatcanbewornaroundtheneck.Ittakespicturesautomatically,capturingspontaneousimagesthatuserscanviewlater.Integratedwithpowerfulcomputingandnetworkingcapability,GoogleGlass[2]providesmuchmorethanhands-freevideorecordingsuchasaugmentedrealityfeaturesandvoicecommands.Therehavebeenalsovariousresearchprototypesthatattempttodevelopend-to-endapplicationsusingwearablecameras(e.g.,adietmonitoringsystem[5]).Privacyissuesassociatedwithtraditionalrecordingtechnologies(e.g.,CCTV,phoneswithcameras)stillremain,asdemonstratedbytheeaseofndingspycamwithasimpleonlinesearch.Asalways-onandtravelingwhereverawearergoes,theseissueswouldgetonlyworsewithwearablecameras.However,preventingunauthorizedrecordingisdicultevenwithlegalenforcementandtherearefewtechnicalsolutionsavailable(exceptaresearchprototypebyTruongetal.[7]).Inthispaper,wefocusonwell-intendedusersofwearablecamerasandtheprivacyissuesthattheyfacewhentheyencounterpeopleintheeldofview(FoV).Wearguethattheseprivacyissuesarisebecausewearablecamerasviolatesocialnormsthatpeopledevelopedaroundtheuseofhand-heldcameras.First,designedtobesmallandalmostcovert,wearablecamerasarehardtobenoticedbypeoplewhoareinFoV,thusdeprivingthemfromanopportunitytooptoutfromrecording(bywalkingoutsideFoVorcoveringtheface).Second,asthesecamerasareoftenlefton,eventhewearermaynotbeawareofrecordingandfailtoasktheconsenttothepeoplebeingrecorded.Indeed,Denningetal.reportthat17outof31participantstheyinterviewedexpressedthepreferenceforsomeonetoasktheirpermissionbeforerecordingthemwithaugmentedrealitydevices[4].Third,evenifthewearerrecognizesthatsomepeopleinFoVexpressedtheirpreferencenottoberecorded,itmaytakesomedelayandmaneuvertorespond(e.g.,oneneedstoholdabuttonfor6secondstoswitchoAutographer).Weproposethatitmaybeviabletomitigatetheseprivacyissueswithoutreducingthebenetsofcontinuousrecordingoftheeventsofinterestifwecanuselow-delitysensors,especiallyfar-infrared(FIR)imagerstomonitorforknownsocialcuessoastodeterminewhenisokaytoturnon/oRGBcameraswhichareusedtorunvisiontasks.Wearguethathavingaseparatesensordedicatedforenforcingprivacyruleswouldreducetheattacksurfaceandascapturingonlylow-delitythermalimages(ratherthanfull edgedRGBimages),FIRimagerscandosowiththeleastprivilege.Wepresentaninitialprototypeandadirectionforongoingresearchtofullydevelopawearablecamerathatiscourteous.SocialNormsWithRespectToRecordingIntheUS,dierentsetoflawsgovernaudioandvideorecordingsrespectively.Ourlimitedreviewoftheselaws(e.g.,http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide)suggestthatrecordingaprivateconversationrequiresconsentfromoneorallpartiesbuttherequirementvariesstatebystate.However,videosurveillanceismostlyallowedwithoutconsentinpublicplaces(e.g.,shoppingmalls,citystreets)althoughsomestatesbantheuseofvideoorstillcameraswherethesubjecthasanexpectationofprivacy(e.g.,bathrooms).Althoughthelegallandscapeisamurkyandchanging,thereareafewsocialnormsthatpeoplehavebeenusinginordertoberespectfulforothers'privacypreferenceswhenshootingvideo: Opt-in:thecameraholderobtainsconsentfromthesubjectusuallythroughaverbalengagementbeforetakingapictureNotication:thecameraexplicitlysignalsrecording(withredlightorclickingsound)O-the-record(OTR):thesubjectsendssignalsofthedesirenottoberecordedeithertryingtoblockthecamera'sFoVorgettingoutoftheview.Aswediscussedintheprevioussection,wearablecamerastypicallyviolateallthesethreenormsastheyarecontinuouslycapturingscenestorunvarioustaskswhetherpeopleareinthesceneornot.Asaconsequence,wearablecamerasmayinadvertentlyrecordanddisclosepeoplesimagesagainsttheirwish,makingthemaccountablefortheiractionsandlocations(e.g.,iftheimagecapturedapersonatacompanyforacondentialjobinterview).NotethatourproposaliscomplementarytothesolutionproposedbyTemplemanetal.toblockcapturingblacklistedplaces[6].Tomitigatesuchprivacyissues,weproposethefollowingcourtesyprotocolforwearablecameras(Figure1).Webelievethattheprotocolwouldhaveaminimalimpactonmanytasksthatareproposedtorunonthesecamerasifthetasksdonotinvolvepeople(e.g.,remindingpeopletotakeapillbeforeeating,trackingthelastlocationwhereacarkeyisleft,keepingarecordofmealstaken).Fortheprotocoltobeeective,weassumeaprivacy-preservingoraclethattracksthepresenceofpeopleanddetectso-the-recordgestureswithoutrecordingvideoimages.1:while(true)f2:if(recordingison)f3:if(anewpersonentersintoFoV)4:turn off recording();5:elseif(OTRgestureisdetected)6:turn off recording();7:gelsef8:if(nopeoplearepresentinFoV)9:turnonrecording();10:elseif(anewpersonentersintoFoV)11:launchtheoptinprocess();12:g13:gFigure1:Apseudocodeofthecourtesyprotocol:ThegoalistoturnonrecordingdevicesonlywhennopeoplearepresentinFoVorpeopleinFoVhaveconsentedforrecording.Nowweturntothequestionofhowtoimplementthisprivacy-preservingoracle.Firstwhentherecordingison(lines2to6),wemaypiggybackthetasksofdetectinganewperson(line3)ando-the-recordgestures(line5)usingstandardcomputervisionalgorithms.However,whentherecordingiso(lines8to11),weneedwaystodetectpeopleenteringinFoVwithoutrelyingonRGBcameras.Althoughinprinciple,onecanre-purposeRGBcameraswithsoftwarestacksthatlimittherecordingfunctionality,wearguethatsoftware-basedsolutionsarepronetoattacks(e.g.,[3]).Tominimizetheattacksurface,weproposethataseparatesensorshouldbeusedforenforcingtheprotocolwithhardware-levelisolation.Next,weoutlineoursolution.CourteousGlassFigure2showsourinitialhardwaremockup.Thewearablecameraisintegratedwithafar-infrared(FIR)imagerthatactsasaprivacy-preservingoraclediscussedintheprevioussection.Althoughcurrentlyhardware-basedcameraisolationistentativelyrepresentedwithawebcamcover,weenvisionthatalightweightcontrolcanbeeasily addedtomovethecoverelectronically. Figure2:AninitialhardwareprototypeofcourteousglassthatusesaFIRimagertoimplementthecourtesyprotocolshowninFigure1.TheRGBcameracanbecoveredup(asshownintherightpicture)whentheFIRimagerdetectsnewpeopleinFoVwhohavenotconsentedforrecordingyet.FIRImagersOurworkismotivatedinpartbythedrasticfallincostoffar-infrared(FIR)imagers.Theseimagersreportatemperaturereadingateachpixel.Thereadingatapixelistheaverageoftheestimatedtemperaturesofobjectsinitseldofview.FIRimagersestimatetemperaturebyassumingthatobjectsarenon-ideallack-bodyradiatorsatequilibrium.Atthermalequilibrium,idealblackbodiesproduceelectromagnetic(EM)radiationinaspectrumspeciedbyPlanckslaw.Giventhespectrum,therefore,itispossibletoestimatethetemperatureoftheobject.Non-idealblackbodiescanbecharacterizedroughlybyanadditionalmultiplicativeparameterknownattheiremissivity.Mostnon-re ectivenon-transparentobjectshaveanemissivitycloseto1,makingitpossibletoestimatethetemperaturesofmostscenesbymeasuringtheEMspectrumperpixel.Thetechnologyformeasuringthespectrumateachpixelhasgrowndramaticallylessexpensiveandlessbulkyoverthepastdecade.AsFigure3shows,technologyhasevolvedfrombackpack-sizedliqueed-gascooledsystemscostingtensofthousandsofdollarstothroughuncooledMEMS-basedchipscostingseveralhundreddollarstomostrecently,uncooledthermopile-basedarraysthatcosttensofdollarsorless.Wefullyexpectatlow-resolutionimagerstobepricedforinclusionintomobiledevicesoverthenextfewyears. Figure3:TechnologytrendovertimeformeasuringthespectrumateachpixelAsFigure4shows,givenoutputfromanFIRsensor,itisoftenquitesimpletodetectwhetherahumanisintheeldofviewwhilestillnotbeingabletotellwhothehumanis.Overawideambienttemperature,surfacetemperaturesoffacesrangebetween30and35C.Temperature-controlledbuildings(e.g.,oces,mallsandhomes)areusuallysetbelow25C,sothattheabsolutetemperatureisanexcellentmeansofdetectingfaces.Italsoshowsthatalthoughdetailsaremissing,FIRimagescancapturesimplegesturesreasonablywell,enablinganFIRsensortorunataskofdetectingo-the-recordsignalsinline5ofFigure1. Figure4:RGBimages(top)vs.FIRimages(botton):Theimageontherightshowsthatao-the-recordgesture(tryingtoblockthecamera)canbealsodetectedusinganFIRimage.WenowexamineinmoredetailtheperformanceofFIRsensorsasa\gating"mechanismfordetectingpeople.Ideally,wewantgoodrecallandprecision:wewouldliketomaximizethefractionoftruefacesdetectedwhileminimizingthefractionofpixelsfalselydetectedasfaces.Theperformanceofthisschemewillofcoursedependonthepreciseface-detectionalgorithmappliedtotherawsensordata.Hereweconsiderasimpleschemewhereifthetemperatureofapixelexceedsaxedthreshold,weinferthatafaceispresentatthatpixelelseweinfernoface.Figure5showstheresultsfromasimpleexperimentestimatingthefractionofpixelsfromFIRfootagecollectedfrommanythousandframesfromwarmoutdoor(24Cambienttemperature),coldoutdoor(11C),coldindoorgarage(14C),indooroce(21C)andindoorlobby(19Cwithpeopleconstantlycominginfromcoldoutside)settings.Wepickasingletemperaturethresholdinthesesettingsandcomparethefractionoffacesforwhichatleastonepixelisabovethatthreshold(x-axis)tothefractionofpixelsthatarefalselydesignatedasfaces(y-axis).Atathresholdof85F(29.4C),forinstance,wedetect89%offaceswhileonlyallowing3%ofnon-facepixels.Thesenumbersrepresentearlyresultsusingaparticularlysimpledetector.Forinstance,thesepixelscouldgothroughanotherstageofface-detectionbasedontemperaturepatternsfortheface(asopposedtocrudesingle-thresholdrejection),yieldingfalsepositivefacesonceeveryhourorso.Further,the11%oftimeswhenwefailedtorecognizefaces,itwasoftenbecausethefaceswerefacingawayfromwearers.Whenfacesdirectlyfacethewearers,weexpectmuchhigherdetectionrates,missingperhaps0.1%ofallface-to-faceinteractions(basedonanalyzingourcurrentface-ondata). Figure5:Facedetectionratesvs.settingsInsummary,webelievethatFIRsensorsaresuitablefor