/
Withdrawal, Submission and Completion: The Frustrations and Withdrawal, Submission and Completion: The Frustrations and

Withdrawal, Submission and Completion: The Frustrations and - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
378 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-24

Withdrawal, Submission and Completion: The Frustrations and - PPT Presentation

Professor Pam Denicolo University of Surrey Withdrawal Supporting a struggling student who might produce a good thesis in the end has consequences good but challenging for the student supervisors and the institution ID: 291161

frustrations supervisors student examiners supervisors frustrations examiners student years submission dilemmas time support thesis good work completion recipients doctoral

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Withdrawal, Submission and Completion: T..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Withdrawal, Submission and Completion: The Frustrations and Dilemmas of Supervisors and Examiners

Professor Pam Denicolo

University of SurreySlide2

Withdrawal

Supporting a struggling student who might produce a good thesis in the end has consequences, good but challenging, for the student, supervisors, and the institution.

Supporting a struggling student who produces a poor thesis in the end has unfortunate consequences

for the student, supervisors, the institution and the examiners.Finding a balance - a delicate matter.For SUPERVISORS there is a tension between patient support and unkind, unproductive prolonging of the agony. Every examiner’s nightmare:The poor thesis produced by a candidate who should have been counselled out years before.INSTITUTIONS can’t have their cake (lots of registered doc researchers)And then let it grow mouldy on the shelf.Slide3

Timely Submission: Frustrations and dilemmas for supervisors

The research process is NEVER problem-free,

eg

:Physical and human resource availability and unpredictability.Unexpected publications, interim results, breakdowns and natural disasters.3 to 6 years of adult life bring unanticipated and time-consuming joys and sorrows.Candidates have unforeseeable struggles with new approaches, techniques and skills. Managing the people and the process in a supportive yet time-focussed way is always a challenge, And can lead to chronic indigestion for all. Slide4

Timely Submission: Frustrations and dilemmas for examiners

The next biggest frustrations:

Premature submission

Enormous assessment task + concern about where the fault liesOR:Delayed submission How many times can you re-organise your diary to accommodate circa a week’s work?Slide5

Completion: Frustrations and dilemmas for

supervisors and examiners

For supervisors:

Delayed completions add to previously-predicted work loadTension between providing support and recognising the autonomy of the researcherWorry for the student and for reputations.Pressure from funders.For examiners:Re-examinations adds to previously-predicted work loadTension in case revised version still doesn’t meet the standard.BUTCf our 3 to 4 years with Report of the (US) MLA Task Force on Doctoral Study in Modern Language and Literature“We are faced with an unsustainable reality: a median time to degree of around nine years for language and literature doctoral recipients and a long-term academic job market that provides tenure-track employment for only around [60] percent of doctorate recipients.”Slide6

A person can dream, can’t s/he?

It is everyone’s goal that each registered doctorate results in successful completion witnessed by a non-trivial contribution to knowledge, well-communicated by a

researcher,

as a professional critical thinker with good generic skills.It is clear that some research topics require more or less time than others to reach that goal while some doc candidates have more or less than others: personal and supervisory support/life problems/need for carrots & sticks.Careful selection, induction and regular and constructive monitoring with feedback helps but are not infallible.We need a more humane system thatresponds flexibly to circumstance but has sector-agreed boundaries, implemented by appropriately trained staff.