/
Quotation Sebastián López Maza Quotation Sebastián López Maza

Quotation Sebastián López Maza - PowerPoint Presentation

stingraycartier
stingraycartier . @stingraycartier
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-11-06

Quotation Sebastián López Maza - PPT Presentation

Lecturer Universidad Autónoma of Madrid Session I Freedom of speech 1 General considerations Quotation is a limit to copyright It is one of the oldest ID: 816085

work quotation court works quotation work works court appeal author section quoted source exception requirements judgment teaching madrid purposes

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Quotation Sebastián López Maza" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Quotation

Sebastián López MazaLecturerUniversidad Autónoma of Madrid

Session

I:

Freedom

of

speech

Slide2

1.- General

considerations. - Quotation is a limit to copyright.

-

It

is

one of the oldest limitations to copyright.

BC: 1885 Conference, but restricted to educational and scientific publications.

- This exception has been included in all the national laws (e.g.: art. 51 UrhG, L.122-5.3.a CPI, 70.1 Italian Law…).

Rome Revision Conference: expressly included and in a general way.

Slide3

-

From the moment a work is disclosed, it is destined to be quoted.- Authors

cannot

prevent

this use.- It is not only

referred to protected works, but also to works fallen into

the public domain.Although the work is in the public domain, we

have to repect

the

requirements of

quotation

exception

anyway

.

-

It

is

also

a

limit

to

freedom

of

speech

.

Slide4

2.-

Requirements for its

application

.

A

rticle

32.1 LPI, «It shall be lawful to include in one’s own work fragments of the works of others, whether of written, sound or audiovisual character, and also to include isolated works of photographic or figurative art character, provided that the works concerned have already been disclosed and that they are included by way of quotation or for analysis, comment or critical assessment. Such use may only be made

for teaching or research purposes and to the extent justified by the purpose of the inclusion, and the source and the name of the author of the work shall be stated».

Slide5

Disclosure

of the quoted work

.

- “Disclosure”: a wider

concept

than “publication”.

Distribution + public communication.

- Respect of the moral right of disclosure.If anyone makes an undisclosed work accessible to the public, he or she would infringe the moral right of the author.

The extent of the quotation must not exceed what is justified by the purpose.- No more than necessary may be quoted in order to support or illustrate the ideas expressed by the person making the quotation.

Slide6

- Q

uantitative and qualitative point of view.

From the quantitative point of view, the Spanish Law does not establish quotations to be short.

From

the qualitative point of view, the quotation must be in the

background.

Length of quotation.

- Spanish Law: only fragments from literary, sound or audiovisual works, and the whole work, but isolated, regarding to photographic or art works.If a part of an artistic works is quoted, it could infringe the right of integrity.

* Court of Appeal of Madrid (Section 13ª), of 26 February 2007.

Slide7

Teaching

and research purposes.- This

requirement

limits

the application of the exception.- Who

makes research? And teaching?- E-learning is included but

we have to keep in mind that quotation is not a privileged exception (art. 161.1 LPI ).Right holders

that use technological

measures

to

protect

their

works

can forbit

the

making

of

quotations

not

only

in online

environtment

,

but

also

in offline

one

.

*

Court of Appeal of Barcelona (Section 15ª), on 3 May 2010.

-

Interesting

Judgments

about

this

requirement

:

*

Court of Appeal of Asturias (Section 7ª), on 28 February 2002.

*

Court of Appeal of Madrid (Section 14ª), on 23 December 2003.

Slide8

- New uses in

the digital environment.

Linking:

the

following

requirements are not met:* U

sing a fragment of the work.* Teaching or research purposes.

* Supreme Court of Spain, on 3 April 2012.The use of fragments of musical works (sound samples), videos (clip trailers) or literary works in webpages, with the aim of selling the product.There are not teaching or search purposes, but the inclusion is made looking for profit.

Slide9

To indicate the source and the author’s name.

- This requirements

is

based

on two reasons:* To do not infringe the right of paternity. * To allow readers to recognize the quoted author and to reach the original source.

- Especial cases:* It is not necessary to indicate the author when is impossible to do so, because it does not appear in the work or he or she is unknown. * If the work is anonymous, it must be only quoted the source.

* If the author uses a pseudonym, it has to be stated.

Slide10

- If the source and the name of the author are not stated: plagiarism.

* Judgment of the

Court

of Appeal of Cantabria on 20 April 1999.

- What happen if I quote historical or artistic data?

If you copy the original form in which such data have been expressed, they have to indicate the source.

Slide11

3.- Non-

stated requirements.

- The kinds of work that may be quoted.

-

Quotations may be made in the course of a lecture, performance or broadcast, as in a material form such as a book or article.

-

Lucrative aims: they are not allow because otherwise would go against the three-step test. * Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Madrid (Section 28ª).*

Judgment of he Court of Appeal of Sevilla (Section 6ª).

Slide12

The way of making the quotation: the quoted part (quotation marks, using italics…) must be distinguished from the part of the author that quotes.

* Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Valencia (Section 9), on 3 January 2007.*

Judgment of t

he Court of Appeal of Madrid (Section 25ª), on 3 June 2003.

Slide13

4.-

Conclussions.If we do a literal interpretation of the law, the application of the quotation exception will take place in very few cases.

To allow quotations without profit aims respecting right holders in Internet?

To state a remuneration right for the author here?

Slide14

Thank

you very

much

for

your

attention!