/
Code of Conduct for Researchers Code of Conduct for Researchers

Code of Conduct for Researchers - PDF document

summer
summer . @summer
Follow
347 views
Uploaded On 2021-10-06

Code of Conduct for Researchers - PPT Presentation

1The Centre146code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on 1Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals a ID: 896544

data research conduct ethics research data ethics conduct x0027 issues code researchers review organisation responsibility policy secondary individuals primary

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Code of Conduct for Researchers" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The
1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society 2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected 1 2 6.Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.7.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. Conflicts of interestPlease refer to the Centre's separate policy on 'Conflict of interest for affiliated researchers' for further information. NBER, Research Disclosure Policy, 2011. ttp://www.nber.org/researchdisclosurepolicy.html . The NBER policy is in turn modelled after that of the National Institutes of Health. 2 6.Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.7.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. Conflicts of interestPlease refer to the Centre's separate policy on 'Conflict of interest for affiliated researchers' for further information. Signed:............................................. Date:................................... 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on Research Councils UK's 'Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct' se are based onsix key principles of ethical research that should beaddressed whenever applicable: 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected3.Wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately4.Research should be conducted with integrity and transparency5.Lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined6.Independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of Seven practices should be adopted to implement these principles: 1.The responsibility for conduct of the research in line with relevantprinciples rests with the principal investigator and the research /employing organisation.2.The responsibility for ensuring that research is subject to appropriateethics review, approval and monitoring lies with the researcher orresearch organisation seeking or holding an award with CEPR andwhich employs the researchers performing it, or some of theresearchers when it is acting as the co-ordinator for collaborativeresearch involving more than one organisation.3.Research organisations should have clear, transparent, appropriateand effective procedures in place for ethics review, approval andgovernance whenever it is necessary.4.Risks should be minimised.5.Research should be designed in a way that the dignity and autonomyof research participants is protected and respected at all times. 1 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on Research Councils UK's 'Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct' se are based onsix key principles of ethical research that should beaddressed whenever applicable: 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected3.Wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately4.Research should be conducted with integrity and transparency5.Lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined6.Independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of Seven practices should be adopted to implement these principles: 1.The responsibility for conduct of the research in line with relevantprinciples rests with the principal investigator and the research /employing organisation.2.The responsibility for ensuring that research is subject to appropriateethics review, approval and monitoring lies with the researcher orresearch organisation seeking or holding an award with CEPR andwhich employs the researchers performing it, or some of theresearchers when it is acting as the co-ordinator for collaborativeresearch involving more than one organisation.3.Research organisations should have clear, transparent, appropriateand effective procedures in place for ethics review, approval andgovernance whenever it is necessary.4.Risks should be minimised.5.Research should be designed in a way that the dignity and autonomyof research participants is protected and respected at all times. 1 2 6.Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.7.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. Conflicts of interestPlease refer to the Centre's separate policy on 'Conflict of interest for affiliated researchers' for further information. Signed:............................................. Date:................................... 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on Research Councils UK's 'Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct' se are based onsix key principles of ethical research that should beaddressed whenever applicable: 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected3.Wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately4.Research should be conducted with integrity and transparency5.Lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined6.Independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of Seven practices should be adopted to implement these principles: 1.The responsibility for conduct of the research in line with relevantprinciples rests with the principal investigator and the research /employing organisation.2.The responsibility for ensuring that research is subject to appropriateethics review, approval and monitoring lies with the researcher orresearch organisation seeking or holding an award with CEPR andwhich employs the researchers performing it, or some of theresearchers when it is acting as the co-ordinator for collaborativeresearch involving more than one organisation.3.Research organisations should have clear, transparent, appropriateand effective procedures in place for ethics review, approval andgovernance whenever it is necessary.4.Risks should be minimised.5.Research should be designed in a way that the dignity and autonomyof research participants is protected and re

2 spected at all times. 1 2 6.Ethics rev
spected at all times. 1 2 6.Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.7.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. Conflicts of interestPlease refer to the Centre's separate policy on 'Conflict of interest for affiliated researchers' for further information. Signed:............................................. Date:................................... 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on Research Councils UK's 'Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct' se are based onsix key principles of ethical research that should beaddressed whenever applicable: 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected3.Wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately4.Research should be conducted with integrity and transparency5.Lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined6.Independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of Seven practices should be adopted to implement these principles: 1.The responsibility for conduct of the research in line with relevantprinciples rests with the principal investigator and the research /employing organisation.2.The responsibility for ensuring that research is subject to appropriateethics review, approval and monitoring lies with the researcher orresearch organisation seeking or holding an award with CEPR andwhich employs the researchers performing it, or some of theresearchers when it is acting as the co-ordinator for collaborativeresearch involving more than one organisation.3.Research organisations should have clear, transparent, appropriateand effective procedures in place for ethics review, approval andgovernance whenever it is necessary.4.Risks should be minimised.5.Research should be designed in a way that the dignity and autonomyof research participants is protected and respected at all times. 1 2 6.Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.7.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. separate policy affiliated researchers' 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on Research Councils UK's 'Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct' se are based onsix key principles of ethical research that should beaddressed whenever applicable: 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected3.Wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately4.Research should be conducted with integrity and transparency5.Lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined6.Independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of Seven practices should be adopted to implement these principles: 1.The responsibility for conduct of the research in line with relevantprinciples rests with the principal investigator and the research /employing organisation.2.The responsibility for ensuring that research is subject to appropriateethics review, approval and monitoring lies with the researcher orresearch organisation seeking or holding an award with CEPR andwhich employs the researchers performing it, or some of theresearchers when it is acting as the co-ordinator for collaborativeresearch involving more than one organisation.3.Research organisations should have clear, transparent, appropriateand effective procedures in place for ethics review, approval andgovernance whenever it is necessary.4.Risks should be minimised.5.Research should be designed in a way that the dignity and autonomyof research participants is protected and respected at all times. 1 2 6.Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.7.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. separate policy affiliated researchers' 2 6.Research should be designed in such a way that research participants Ethics reviews should always be proportionate to the potential risk,whether this involves primary or secondary data.Whilst the secondary use of some datasets may be relativelyuncontroversial, and require only light touch ethics review, novel use ofexisting data and especially data linkage, as well as some uses ofadministrative and secure data will raise issues of ethics. Researchinvolving primary data collection will always raise issues of ethics thatmust be addressed. separate policy affiliated researchers' 1.The source of funding for the research must be acknowledged at2.Researchers must disclose any relevant and material financial3.All co-authors of papers distributed through CEPR, not just CEPR 1 Code of Conduct for Researchers The Centre’code of conduct addresseissueof ethiand disclosure of interests. The treatment of ethical issues in the code of conduct draws on Research Councils UK's 'Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct' se are based onsix key principles of ethical research that should beaddressed whenever applicable: 1.Research should aim to maximise benefit for individuals and society2.The rights and dignity of individuals and groups should be respected3.Wherever possible, participation should be voluntary and appropriately4.Research should be conducted with integrity and transparency5.Lines of responsibility and accountability should be clearly defined6.Independence of research should be maintained and where conflicts of practices should be adopted to implement these principles: 1.The responsibility for conduct of the research in line with relevantprinciples rests with the principal investigator and the research /employing organisation.2.The responsibility for ensuring that research is subject to appropriateethics review, approval and monitoring lies with the researcher orresearch organisation seeking or holding an award with CEPR andwhich employs the researchers performing it, or some of theresearchers when it is acting as the co-ordinator for collaborativeresearch involving more than one organisation.3.Research organisations should have clear, transparent, appropriateand effective procedures in place for ethics review, approval andgovernance whenever it is necessary.4.Risks should be minimised.5.Research should be designed in a way that the dignity and autonomyof research participants is protected and respected at all times.