/
X-bar and R charts Example 3.1 X-bar and R charts Example 3.1

X-bar and R charts Example 3.1 - PowerPoint Presentation

susan
susan . @susan
Follow
65 views
Uploaded On 2024-01-03

X-bar and R charts Example 3.1 - PPT Presentation

from older text 1 Data on part thickness Thickness of parts recorded as amount by which thickness exceeded 0300 in everyone else has gone metric but 2 Data structure Sample Value ID: 1039197

common special bar chart special common chart bar data thickness process present variation control difference rules presence falsely due

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "X-bar and R charts Example 3.1" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. X-bar and R chartsExample 3.1 from older text1

2. Data on part thickness Thickness of parts recorded as amount by which thickness exceeded 0.300 in. (everyone else has gone metric but……..)2

3. Data structureSample Value1 11 41 61 42 32 72 52 53 43 53 53 7, etc.3

4. Raw data plot, thickness vs sample number4

5. Table 3.2 constants for X-bar and R charts5

6. Rules for creating charts6

7. Rules, etc.7

8. Limits are designed to ….Make sure that the operator does not react to Common cause.Indicate when you are reasonably sure that Special Cause is present.If only Common Cause is present in the process, then the chance of a false signal is about 1%, i.e. the probability that the chart will falsely indicate the presence of Special Cause is about 0.01. 8

9. Similar to Hypothesis TestingIn hypothesis testing we say there is a treatment difference if p<alpha=0.05 (usually).The chance of falsely declaring a treatment difference exists is then about 1 out of 20.In Quality Control, we use the “1 out of 100” criteria to say that our process has more variation than just Common Cause (idea due to Shewhart, it is simple but effective in practice).9

10. R-chart and Common CauseIf the data in each subgroup was collected under “homogeneous conditions”, then the Ranges should reflect only Common Cause. The chart should not indicate the presence of Special Cause.If no signal of Special Cause is indicated, this is not proof that within subgroup variation is only due to Common Cause. (More on this later in Rational Subgrouping.)10

11. R chart11

12. X-bar chart and Special Cause If the R-chart is in control, i.e., stable and predictable, then any shifts in the mean of the process come from Special Cause. If the X-bar chart indicates the process is “out of control”, i.e., that Special Cause is present. We then use a fishbone diagram (or detailed Cause and Effect Matrix) to try to identify and remove the source of Special Cause.12

13. X-bar chart13