/
I ntroduction Vascular  dementia ( I ntroduction Vascular  dementia (

I ntroduction Vascular  dementia ( - PowerPoint Presentation

susan2
susan2 . @susan2
Follow
0 views
Uploaded On 2024-03-15

I ntroduction Vascular  dementia ( - PPT Presentation

VaD is the second most prevalent type of dementia after Alzheimers Disease AD Wolters amp Ikram 2019 Emotion recognition is an important part of social ID: 1048668

eft patients vad ftd patients eft ftd vad group significantly dementia social groningen emotion recognition center disgust surprise sadness

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "I ntroduction Vascular  dementia (" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. IntroductionVascular dementia (VaD) is the second most prevalent type of dementia after Alzheimer's Disease (AD) (Wolters & Ikram, 2019). Emotion recognition is an important part of social cognition (SC), which is the ability to perceive, evaluate and integrate social information. Impairments in social cognition are associated with e.g. social behavioral changes and increased dependence on caregivers (e.g. Henry et al., 2016). Emotion recognition impairments are common in different types of dementia, in particular in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD), but up until now, this has not been studied in patients with VaD. MethodsParticipants N= 22 VaD patients (NINDS-AIREN criteria). N= 21 bv-FTD patients (Rascovsky criteria). N= 25 AD patients (NIA-AA criteria).N= 30 healthy control subjects (HC group)Procedure We assessed emotion recognition in all participants with the Ekman 60 Faces Test (EFT), which is part of the Facial Expression of Emotions- Stimuli and Tests (FEEST; Young et al., 2002), see figure 1. The test contains 60 black and white photographs of 6 universally recognized emotional expressions (anger, sadness, disgust, fear, surprise & happiness). Figure 1: example facial affect pictures from the EFT. AimTo investigate emotion recognition performance in VaD patients compared to healthy older adults, as well as to patients with AD and bv-FTD. ResultsConclusionEmotion recognition is impaired in patients with VaD; severity of impairment is intermediate between AD and bv-FTD. With the results of this study, we urge clinicians and researchers to systematically investigate social cognition in all patients with (suspected) dementia visiting the memory clinic, including patients with VaD, and to address social cognitive impairment in consultation and treatment. Emotion Recognition in patients with Vascular Dementia: a comparison with Alzheimer's Disease and Frontal Temporal DementiaFijanne Strijkert1,3, Rients B. Huitema2,3, Barbara C. van Munster1,3, Jacoba M. Spikman2,31 Department of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands 2 Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands3 Alzheimer Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands f.strijkert@umcg.nlLinkedIn: Alzheimer Centrum GroningenAlzheimer Centrum Groningen (umcg.nl)All patient groups had significantly lower EFT-total score than the HC group (p<.01).No significant differences were found for any of the EFT measures between the VaD group and the bv-FTD and AD groups. The bv-FTD group had significantly lower EFT-Total score than the AD group (p<.01).For the different emotions, VaD patients had significantly lower scores than the HC group on EFT-Sadness (p<.001), EFT-Anger and EFT-Surprise (p<.01), and EFT-Disgust (p=.01). Bv-FTD patients had significantly lower scores than the HC group for EFT-Disgust, Sadness and Surprise (p<.001), as well as EFT-Anger, EFT-Fear (both p<.01) and Happiness (p=.04). bv-FTD patients also had significantly lower scores than AD patients on EFT-Disgust and EFT-Surprise (p<.05). Finally, AD patients had significantly lower scores than the HC group on EFT-Fear and EFT-Sadness (both p=.02).