/
Democracy and Political Legitimacy Democracy and Political Legitimacy

Democracy and Political Legitimacy - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
427 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-22

Democracy and Political Legitimacy - PPT Presentation

Training Session 06052015 But first Political culture and socialisation Its about political behaviour setting out the rules of what iswhat is not accepted in politics Excommunist states ID: 330321

political people

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Democracy and Political Legitimacy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Democracy and Political Legitimacy

Training Session 06.05.2015Slide2

But first... Political culture and

socialisationIt’s about political behaviour, setting out the rules of what is/what is not accepted in politics

Ex-communist states

Continuously changing

, it is not something you are born with, but intoPre-requisite for democracy Is there such a thing as national political culture?This is why, even if you remove an undemocratic regime, it is hard to institute democracySlide3
Slide4

Why do we like democracy?

Formal political equality

Self-ownership-it is the only form of political organisation that provides this

Popular control

Public DeliberationSeparation of power in the stateRule of lawEquality before the lawIt provides us with:

A m

eans

of selecting governments

A d

ecision-making mechanism(aggregate of preference)Slide5

Aggregate of preferences

There are competing interests and needs in society.

As long as a majority of people express their preference, then the action of the government will mimic this. But do they?

1. Political parties often govern with an agenda

2. Interest groups(especially those with insider status)3. Unseen lobbying power of companies

4. Disproportionate representation of those with more resources

5. Media manipulation (media usually has a political agenda and is backed by people with money)

But, givent that direct representation is

1. Impractical(decisions would take ages)

2. Inefficient(you elect representatives who are competent)

This is the best form of representation we haveSlide6

Public Deliberation

Policies to be discussed in the public eye

This means that people have a fair input to highlight the strenghts and failings of a policy

Removal of bad policy and implementation of policies that win the debate

But...Policy often manifests ideological starting pointsAgreeing with a party on the opposite side of the ideological spectre might be seen as ‘giving in’ This means that sometimes the ideological dispute comes before the actual pros/cons of the measureSlide7

Formal political equality

Who is the ‘we’ that government needs to represent

Is it the nation/citizens?

Is it all the people that are affected by a policy?

What is the best method for our wishes to be incorporated in the decision-making processRepresentative systems of elections tend to favourize the What are the criteria on which we should let people participate

in voting

Ability

(level of information and ability to understand it influence decision)

Social inclusion

(should we allow people in prisons to vote, residents)

Median-voter theorem

problem

Political parties ultimately want to be electedThey will focus on attracting the median voter rather than minoritary interestsSlide8

Just because ‘it’s democratic’ doesn’t mean it’s good

Often in debates people stop their analysis when they reach the level of

‘it’s democratic’

We take democracy generally as a good system of governing, since it’s a cumulus of good values/principles

You need to link the argument to the principle and show it’s importantAlso, sometimes the principles need auxiliary conditions in order to mean anything (e.g. it doesn’t matter if all people can vote if there is heavy propaganda, threats and only one candidate)Slide9

Legitimacy

“Legitimacy involves the capacity of the system to engender and maintain the belief that the existing political institutions are the most appropriate ones for the society”-

Seymour

Lipset

It’s a lot about people’s beliefsIf people consider something to be true, they will act as if it were trueLegitimacy does not equal legality. An action can be legal, but not legitimate.Slide10

Why do we need legitimacy in society

For ensuring compliance to the system

You need some level of buy-in of the public to the policies/the way the system operates

You need this for example for the rule of law to operate

So conferring legitimacy is an every-day processLoss of legitimacy is hard to measure, but it’s consequences are usually the loss of power(see Arab spring)Pursuit of individual interests in general

Social cohesion, social trust

Note: The more ‘democratic’ a policy seems to the people, the more buy-in you’re likely to get as a policy-makerSlide11

Sources of legitimacy

Traditional

This links back to political culture

You are born in a system of institutions and values that you tend, at least at first, to regard as natural and take them for granted

Are you then acually ‘conferring’ legitimacy to a regime, or you just think that is the normal way things should be? CharismaticRationalDoes it respect a certain system of rules/values? (note that this is influenced by the traditional version)

This is what we normally refer to when we talk about legitimacy in debates

However, the above two are worth rememberingSlide12
Slide13

Problems with legitimacy

We elect leaders to sometimes do the policies that we don’t like. So what is the difference between illegitimate policies and necessary but not liked policies? (except from flagrant cases)

Can an undemocratic regime be legitimate?

What happens if only 20% of the eligible people turn up for elections?

Is the candidate that wins a legitimate ruler?All throughout we assume that people are rational actors that are (almost) perfectly informed. What happens when they are not informed or can be easily manipulated?See the rise of far-right parties in Europe using a lot of rhe

toricSlide14

Next time...

Applied Ethics