PPT-Election Security 1

Author : tatiana-dople | Published Date : 2019-12-06

Election Security 1 Tyler Johnson INSVRS Business Analyst GCR Seth Cooper INSVRS Program Manager Baker Tilly Thomas White INSVRS Project Manager Baker Tilly What

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Election Security 1" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Election Security 1: Transcript


Election Security 1 Tyler Johnson INSVRS Business Analyst GCR Seth Cooper INSVRS Program Manager Baker Tilly Thomas White INSVRS Project Manager Baker Tilly What is the threat Any actor can be located in any geographical area and can tamper with voter registration access voting machines manipulate storage and transmission of results and influence election outcomes. These were previously in ARS 16905C and 16905E Reduced by 20 pursuant to ARS 16941B Reduced by 20 pursuant to ARS 16941B ARS 16905A1 A2 B1 ARS 16905A3 A4 B2 ARS 16905A5 B3 G Revised 01292014 EN ENNETT ECRETARY OF TATE TATE OF RIZONA CAMPAIGN CONTRIB (. Jefferson. v. Adams/Burr. ). Democratic- Republican Party split their votes between two candidates. . You would vote for a president and vice president at the same time, not together like we do today. Gevenny Fernandez. Historical Context. The Republicans controlled the White House . In 1930, the Democrats took over the House of Representatives with a majority of 51%, for the first time in over a decade. Mudslinging Campaign of 1828. Against John Quincy Adams. Accusations of using public $$ to buy gambling instruments. Swims naked in the Potomac. Wife is loyal to King of England. Corrupt bargain. “Pimp Adams”. Professor Ed Fieldhouse. Professor Jane Green. Professor Hermann Schmitt. Professor Geoffrey Evans. Professor Cees van . der. Eijk. EPOP Annual Conference, University of Lancaster, . 14. th. . September 2013. SECURITY THREAT ASSESSMENT: TOWARDS 2016 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION IN . EDO . STATE. 5. th. September, 2016. at . Vichi. Gates Hotel, GRA Benin, Edo State. 1. Introduction. As . Edo State prepares for the gubernatorial election scheduled for September 10, 2016, the political atmosphere of the state is already charged ahead of the election that promises to be one of the most keenly contested in the history of the state. The tense political temperature is further heightened by the inflammatory utterances of the major candidates as well as reported cases of attacks and counter-attacks on their campaign . An Analysis of US & Florida . Results. Aubrey Jewett, PhD. University of Central Florida. Department of Political Science. “Stronger Together”. “Make America Great Again”. Trump Wins . Electoral College, Loses Popular Vote. A Brief Overview. US Presidential Election Process. Electoral College. Primaries, Caucuses and . Conventions. Incumbent and Non-incumbent. General Election. Branches of Government. Political Parties. Add up Electoral College Vote Totals. Color code each candidate and color the states they won. Make some generalizations about where the candidates base of support was found. Based on your knowledge of the Electoral College predict the winner of the election. Election of 1800. The rematch!!. Adams vs. TJ. This time TJ spent 4 years getting ready for the rematch. Without a doubt the craziest election ever!!! . Attack Ad. http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/22/reason-tv-replay-attack-ads-circa-1800. Election Security 1 Tyler Johnson, INSVRS Business Analyst, GCR Seth Cooper, INSVRS Program Manager, Baker Tilly Thomas White, INSVRS Project Manager, Baker Tilly What is the threat? Any actor can be located in any geographical area and can tamper with voter registration, access voting machines, manipulate storage and transmission of results, and influence election outcomes. (HAVA) Funding and Critical Infrastructure Security Utilizing Grant Funding to Address the Top Concerns of State CISOs TABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARYELECTION SYSTEMS AS CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTUREC Valerie Warycha. Co-Counsel. Indiana Election Division. 2023 Election Administrator’s Conference . December 12-14, 2022. Security Policy for Voting Systems and ePBs. Each county election board may have a security protocol to secure its voting systems and ePBs which must contain an audit trail to detect unauthorized access to the systems or ePBs. Community Meeting. Topics. : . Council Honorarium, Election Appeals, By-elections, Resignations and Amendments. Date(s): October 20, 2024 (Prince George); November 23, 2024 (Vancouver). Time: 9:00am – 5:00pm.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Election Security 1"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents