wwwInternationalBudgetorg 3 Transparency Participation Transparency Oversight 16 indicators measuring opportunities for public participation 109 indicators measuring budget transparency ID: 485835
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Improving the accountability of public f..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1Slide2
Improving the accountability of public finance is crucial for achieving global development goalsSlide3
www.InternationalBudget.org
3
Transparency
Participation
Transparency
Oversight
16 indicators measuring opportunities for public participation
109 indicators measuring
budget transparency
(the Open Budget Index)
15 indicators measuring the strength of the legislature and auditors
Methodology: the accountability ecosystem Slide4
www.InternationalBudget.org
4
102 countries were assessed, including 20 countries from the Asia-Pacific region
China
Timor-Leste
Vietnam
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Fiji
Indonesia
MalaysiaMongoliaPapua New GuineaMyanmarNew ZealandPhilippinesSouth KoreaThailandIndiaNepalPakistanSri LankaCambodiaSlide5
www.InternationalBudget.org
5
The vast majority of the world’s population live in countries that provide insufficient budget information.
Between 2012 and 2015 the world made modest progress toward greater transparency. Substantial gains were made by the least transparent countries.
Problems associated with a lack of transparency are compounded by inadequate public participation and weak formal oversight.
The Open Budget Survey 2015: Key findings Slide6
The vast majority of people live in countries that provide insufficient budget informationSlide7
www.InternationalBudget.org
7
The average score for all survey countries is 45 out of 100.
78 countries score 60 or less, meaning they provide insufficient information.
17 countries score 20 or less, meaning scant or no information is available to the public
.
Distribution of countries by Open Budget Index scoreSlide8
www.InternationalBudget.org
8
The average score
for the 20 countries in the Asia-Pacific region is 41.
Only 3 of the 20 countries provide sufficient information (New Zealand, the Philippines, and South Korea).
5
countries
in the region score
20 or less, meaning scant or no information is available to the public
.
Distribution of Asia-Pacific countries by Open Budget Index scoreNumber of CountriesSlide9
www.InternationalBudget.org
9
There are serious gaps in information
One-third of budget documents that should be publicly available are not published.
- 36% of documents are not publicly available in the Asia-Pacific region.
16 countries fail to publish an Executive’s Budget Proposal, a country’s foundational budget document.
- 6 of these countries are in the region (Cambodia, China, Fiji, Myanmar, Nepal, and Vietnam).
Even when budget documents are published they often lack important details. Slide10
Between 2012 and 2015 substantial gains in transparency were made by the least transparent
countries globallySlide11
www.InternationalBudget.org
11
Global progress has been modest…
The global average score on the Open Budget Index increased from 43 to 46 in the 100 countries for which we have comparable data.
- However, in the Asia-Pacific region, the average score decreased
from 44 to 41 (with significant declines in South Asia).
Globally, countries
have increased their scores by an average of 10 points since they were first surveyed.
- In the region, the average increased by 7 points.
The biggest gains have been made by countries that are the least transparent.Slide12
www.InternationalBudget.org
12
…but some countries have made remarkable progress
The Kyrgyz Republic more than doubled its score, from 20 to 54.
Tunisia nearly quadrupled its score, from 11 to 42.
Francophone Africa made considerable gains, the average score among the eight countries surveyed increased by more than 20 points
.
In the Asia-Pacific region, the
Philippines
made
a notable jump,
from 48 to 64. Slide13
www.InternationalBudget.org
13
Despite progress, enthusiasm should be tempered
Improvements have come from a low base.
Twelve
countries have remained at the bottom of the Open Budget Index each time they have been surveyed.
Some countries have regressed.
South Asia’s average score declined by 14 points between 2012 and
2015.
In many countries, there is considerable volatility in disclosure practices.Slide14
Problems associated with insufficient transparency are compounded by inadequate
opportunities fo
r
public participation and weak formal oversight Slide15
www.InternationalBudget.org
15
Most countries don’t provide adequate opportunities for public participation
The average score for public participation is just 25 out of 100
.
-In the Asia-Pacific region, the average is 27.
82 countries are weak in providing opportunities for the public to
participate (15 from the region).
Just seven countries are adequately providing opportunities for public
participation
(3 from the region – Philippines, New Zealand, and South Korea).Slide16
www.InternationalBudget.org
16
Formal oversight is
generally
lacking
In more than half of the countries surveyed, legislatures lack access to independent researchers
.
- In the Asia-Pacific region, three-fourths of the countries lack access.
In the majority of countries, supreme audit institutions have weak or nonexistent quality assurance systems.
- In
the
region, three-fourths of the countries have weak or no quality assurance systems.Slide17
Of the 102 countries surveyed, only
4
perform well across all pillars of budget
accountability. In contrast, 32 countries failed to meet the Survey’s standard of adequacy in any of the pillars. Slide18
www.InternationalBudget.org
18
Improving transparency, participation, and oversight
Recommendation 1: Publish more budget information
Countries that score 40 or below should make more budget documents available to the public.
Countries that score between 41 and 60 should increase the comprehensiveness of budget documents.
Recommendation 2: Institutionalize gains in transparency
Recommendation 3: Provide more opportunities for public participation in the budget process.
Establish legislative hearings at which the public can testify.
Establish formal mechanisms such as participatory budgeting and social audits. Slide19
www.InternationalBudget.org
19
Improving transparency, participation, and oversight
Recommendation 4: Empower oversight institutions
Enable legislatures to engage meaningfully in budgets by providing better access to research and analytical capacity.
Support supreme audit institutions to establish quality assurance systems to improve the accuracy and reliability of their reports.
Recommendation 5: Promote the development of integrated and accountability budget ecosystemsSlide20
www.InternationalBudget.org
20
Contact Information
820 First Street, NE
Suite 510
Washington, DC 20002
Phone: +1-202-408-1080
Fax: +1-202-408-8173Email: info@internationalbudget.org