/
‘ Internationalising ‘ Internationalising

‘ Internationalising - PowerPoint Presentation

tatyana-admore
tatyana-admore . @tatyana-admore
Follow
378 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-15

‘ Internationalising - PPT Presentation

the Curriculum Engaging and Interacting with Diversity Viv Caruana Achieving Graduate Attributes Curriculum Culture Complexity and Community EduFair 2013 conference University of Stirling ID: 320970

students caruana international curriculum caruana students curriculum international internationalisation 2006 global cross cultural 2005 learning internationalised capability culture student

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "‘ Internationalising" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

‘Internationalising the Curriculum’ – Engaging and Interacting with Diversity

Viv Caruana

Achieving Graduate Attributes:

Curriculum, Culture, Complexity and Community

EduFair

2013 conference, University of Stirling

7 March 2013Slide2

Sharing a journey -three projects and other bits and pieces along the way

Caruana, V. and Ploner, J. (2010)

Internationalisation and Equality and Diversity in HE: merging identities,

London: ECU available at:

http://www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/internationalisation-and-equality-and-diversity-in-he-merging-identities

Caruana, V., Clegg, S., Ploner, J., Stevenson, J. and Wood, R. (2011)

Promoting students’ resilient thinking in diverse HE learning environments,

York: HE Academy available at:

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/internationalisation/C-SAP_final_report

Caruana, V. (2013)

Developing a sustainable model for fostering intercultural understanding and building cross-cultural capability through learning in multicultural communities, York/London:

HE

Academy/UKCISA available at:

http://

www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/internationalisation/Connections-Report-LeedsMet-CaruanaSlide3

Back to the future - Early meanings attributed to ‘Internationalisation of the Curriculum’The global dimension and ‘Internationalisation at Home’ (

IaH

)

New, unfamiliar phenomenon

Meaning blurred by distinction between home and international student experiences

‘shift in approach, rather than a radical change of content’ (Shiel and Jones, 2004)

Global perspectives provide ethical underpinning and values-based ethos for a focus on cross-cultural capabilitySlide4

Back to the future - Early meanings attributed to ‘Internationalisation of the Curriculum’

Cross-cultural

capability influences thinking about the relationship between an internationalised curriculum and cross-border student mobility

‘Internationalisation at Home’ for ‘stay at homes’ and to prepare sojourners

(Caruana and

Hanstock

2005; Irving et al 2005; Killick 2006;

Koutsantoni

2006a; Laughton and

Ottewill

2000;

Lunn

2006;

Pyne

et al 2006; Shiel 2006; Shiel and Jones

2004, as cited in

Caruana

and

Spurling

, 2007) Slide5

Back to the Future - Early meanings attributed to ‘Internationalisation of the Curriculum’The sustainability curriculum and the internationalised curriculum – a merging of minds in ‘Global Citizenship’

Territory of geographers, scientists, engineers etc.

From 1990s shift of emphasis to include ethical issues

Sustainability literacy, skills and knowledge are the literacy, skills and knowledge of the ‘Global Citizen’

(

Azapagic

et al 2005;

Haigh

2005, 2006; HE Academy 2006; Martin et al 2005, 2006; McGuiness et al 2005; Scott

2002 as cited in

Caruana

and

Spurling

, 2007)Slide6

The big picture - Embedding internationalisation and global perspectives in strategy and curriculum across institutions

Koutsantoni

(

2006)

44/51 institutions recruitment of international students is main focus of strategy; only 6 universities refer to enhancement of international experience of home students and only 2 acknowledge importance of creating a culture of equality and diversity in internationalisation plans

Gap between the rhetoric of policy statements and the reality of practice

Lack of progress rooted in institutional culture?

(

Bennell

2005; Caruana and

Hanstock

2005;

Koutsantoni

2006;

Lunn

2006; Shiel 2006: Taylor

2004 as cited in

Caruana

and

Spurling

, 2007)Slide7

The big picture - Embedding internationalisation and global perspectives in strategy and curriculum across institutions

Emerging tensions

Conflict with other more locally focused agenda

Trend towards ‘de-internationalisation’

Dilemma for some institutions who just happen to teach some international students

(Caruana and

Hanstock

2003;

Haigh

2002, 2005; Parsons and Fidler 2004; Taylor

2004 as cited in

Caruana

and

Spurling

, 2007)Slide8

A few years on - How staff view the internationalised curriculumCulturally relevant

Empowers international and other ethnically diverse students

Enhances the global dimension for

all

students

Takes account of diversity and provides curriculum space to reflect

Enables students to see their place in the world as global citizens

Embraces ‘internationalisation abroad’ and internationalisation at home’

(Caruana and Ploner, 2010)Slide9

Internationalising the curriculum ‘down under’

The incorporation of an

international and intercultural

dimension into the content of the curriculum as well as the teaching and learning processes and support services of a program

Both international in its content and outlook and inclusive in the way it is taught and assessed

(

Leask

, 2009; Woodley and Pearce, 2007)Slide10

Three key principles of the internationalised curriculumInclusion

Multiple perspectives

Cross-cultural capability

(

Caruana

, 2011)Slide11

The culture gap?Variation in student disposition across disciplines and between undergraduate and postgraduate communities but the overwhelming picture is one of voluntary social segregation

More domestic

students studying locally, maintaining local friendship networks and using local facilities

‘Culture shock’

(or impact of cultural dissonance) interpreted

as a lack of willingness to

integrate

International, home, or simply different?

(Caruana and Ploner, 2010)Slide12

Leeds Metropolitan UniversityInnovation North – Faculty Of Information And TechnologyManifestations of tolerance

Avoidance of

difference

Discomfort around acknowledging

difference

Fear of discriminating or

stereotyping

Integrated Threat Theory

(Hyland

et al, 2006; Harrison and Peacock, 2007; Alexander, 2006)Slide13

Universities trying to bridge the culture gap?

International

societies etc. build cohesion between and among international students but separate them from home students

Celebrations of culture can be counter-productive if not accompanied by events which articulate the common ground

The role of International Offices – the message simply doesn’t get through to home students – International Study Centres and more school/department level

initiatives

Orientation programmes for international students yet little preparation for intercultural settings for domestic

students

(

Caruana

and

Ploner

, 2010)Slide14

Informal curriculum – students suggest…More events that acknowledge multiple identities

International student representation across societies

More structured and authentic opportunities for interaction – conversational classes, peer mentoring schemes, orientation bringing international and home students together

Transition is the common territory

Initiatives operating at school level

(

Caruana

and

Ploner

, 2010)Slide15

Leeds Metropolitan UniversityInnovation North – Faculty Of Information And TechnologyFrom strategy to engagement?

Institutional rhetoric concerning diversity and inclusion, but…

‘…carelessness with which engagement is treated…’

(

Harper and

Quaye

, 2008)Slide16

There are more questions than answers?My students and I just don’t seem to have the same expectations – how am I meant to tackle that?

What ALT strategies make my curriculum more inclusive?

How do I cope, my curriculum is already packed!

We think students don’t want to cross the boundary but we’re not sure, maybe that’s because they need the capability in the first place!Slide17

There are more questions than answers?

Students see the relevance of cross-cultural capability, but can’t see that they’re explicitly assessed on it – so how is it relevant again?

My student cohort is not diverse how does an internationalised curriculum work for them? Does it need to?

Most students don’t want to go abroad how is cross-cultural capability developed for them?

How does global citizenship fit with the internationalised curriculum? Not only staff but many students are uncertain as to how their learning relates to employability and citizenship in a global contextSlide18

Diverse students articulating the university challenge through the lens of resilienceStudents and academics – the two-way learner relationship?

‘…No one knows the thesis like me…’

Understanding how life works

‘…as if you were born in Leeds 25 years old…’

Articulating the boundaries of friendship

‘…Eastern culture westernised…’

Time and space – not understanding events – no background knowledge

Acting out a role

Accents

The stress of life changes

The generation gap

Just hold it there for a moment…

(

Caruana

et al, 2011)Slide19

Leeds Metropolitan UniversityInnovation North – Faculty Of Information And TechnologyCarelessness or discomfort?

‘…

professional intercultural educators know that communicating and interacting with culturally different others is psychologically intense.’ It involves understanding how languages and cultures of others influence their thoughts, values, actions and feelings…’

(

Paige, 1993 as cited in

Caruana

and

Hanstock

, 2005)Slide20

Carelessness or discomfort?

‘…

not feeling confident that I have strong ‘cross-cultural capability’ myself, making it difficult to think about how to facilitate experiences for others. I suppose using the strengths of the students’ different experiences is one way of developing this and therefore devising learning opportunities that encourage this interchange of perspectives as an integral part of the course…’

‘Personal attitudes, values and beliefs are discussed in part of the programme but this can be scary/difficult for lecturers and students at times, especially when attitudes and values conflict.’

(

Caruana

, 2010)Slide21

Internationalised Curriculum and Pedagogy?Cross-cultural capability is less about international travel per se and more about harnessing the diverse experiences of

students

Current

emphasis on multiculturalism and informal curriculum (celebrating difference, valuing non-dominant cultures)

may

create an atmosphere of mutual tolerance but intercultural understanding involves negotiation, shared symbols and meanings to develop ‘relational identity

’Slide22

Internationalised Curriculum and Pedagogy?Transition requires continued maintenance of an authentic relationship with prior and on-going learning and life experience which connects cognitive learning with affective domains

‘Fitting in’ is the greatest challenge which undermines the sense of self and impedes academic performance - importance of meaningful and positive relationships based on trust

(

Caruana

et al, 2011)Slide23

Disciplinary knowledge and internationalised curriculum and pedagogyParadigms and pedagogies – dialogue with student voice to

both acknowledge and shape students’ expectations

and

aspirations

Legitimacy of challenging disciplinary values, norms etc. through crossing cultural boundaries and taking learning out into the community

Shift the focus to knowledge production based on multiple identities and multiple ways of knowing – embrace learning as personal, iterative and emergent…

(

Caruana

et al, 2011;

Caruana

, 2013)Slide24

Disciplinary knowledge and global perspectives?

The

pedagogy of difference, cross-cultural capability and imagining alternative world views is about real people, real events, real situations and engaging the sense of

self

The service learning paradigm offers unique opportunities to develop intercultural understanding among diverse student cohorts

From comfort zone to contact zone – biographical teaching method, engaging the

cognitive and affective domains

without compromising teaching ethics

?

(

Caruana

et al, 2011;

Caruana

, 2012)Slide25

How can my institution support me?

Holistic approach appealing to shared values and local ingenuity

Avoiding burdensome prescription

Nurturing a seamless relationship between disciplinary aims and the aims of intercultural education

Challenging traditional and conservative views of internationalisation

Challenging a pre-occupation with content coverage

Providing the foundation and support for research-informed and evidence-based practice

(Caruana, 2012)Slide26

Thank you!

For references please see supporting Word document.