/
Make Every School Bus Make Every School Bus

Make Every School Bus - PowerPoint Presentation

tatyana-admore
tatyana-admore . @tatyana-admore
Follow
379 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-07

Make Every School Bus - PPT Presentation

Better Thomas Bus Oct 4 2011 Steve D Goss Sanjay Kumar Jim Lannan Agenda Update on successes IC Bus Fluid Economy Claims Cummins Fuel Economy How to sell Cummins School Bus Industry Data ID: 556803

fuel egr economy def egr fuel def economy bus cummins thomas nox built buses standard system cylinder template ppt

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Make Every School Bus" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Make Every School Bus Better.

Thomas Bus Oct 4, 2011 Steve D Goss Sanjay Kumar Jim LannanSlide2

Agenda

Update on successesIC Bus ‘Fluid’ Economy Claims

Cummins Fuel Economy

How to sell CumminsSlide3

School Bus Industry DataIndustry data suggests a 5% gain in Cummins market share (50% to 55%)

Recently gained business with largest bus customer Slide4

IC Bus ‘Fluid’ Economy Claims

IC Bus published report of fuel economy testing stating ‘up to a 4.5%’ advantage vs CumminsCummins responded to claims outlining the points in question including:Transmission shift calibration selectionsAftertreatment regeneration

Avg. Diesel Price

$3.80

Avg. Bulk DEF Price

$2.85

‘Fluid Economy’ also ignores the price differentialSlide5

Transmission shift calibrations

IC Bus did not outline what shift calibrations were used during testingCummins testing validates that proper selection can result in significant fuel economy gains Slide6

Aftertreatment Regeneration

Typical regen cycle on MF 7 at approx. 135 milesSame distance as testMore EGR = More Soot Generated = More Regens

Regenerations require the use of more fuel thus diminishing overall fuel economy Slide7

‘Fluid’ Economy

IC’s claims of ‘fluid’ economy inaccurately represent total cost of ownershipNo mention of DEF consumption thus inability to analyze actual DEF usage for testDifferences in DEF and diesel fuel pricing vary significantly so need to be analyzed separatelySlide8

Cummins Fuel Economy

‘Others Test. We Deliver’Cummins and Thomas Bus both currently testingSlide9

ISB Fuel Economy Tops DTNA Testing

Freightliner M2 106

with Cummins ISB

(EPA 10)

Vs.

International Durastar 4300with MaxxForce DT (EPA10)

Result

8.5% Better Fuel

Economy

2 Regens for ISB Vs 10

for MaxxForce DT in the

14 hour test period

Slide10

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

Fuel economy significantly compromisedIncreased risk of EGR condensationSignificant increase in heat rejection

Complex system integration

Driver satisfaction significantly compromised

Power density and torque limitationsSlide11

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

5-9% disadvantage Combustion efficiency degradation:

Higher engine pumping losses

Increased intake & exhaust manifold pressures

Increased Particulate Filter regenerations

Fuel Economy Significantly CompromisedSlide12

Increased Risk of EGR Condensation

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

Higher EGR flow produces excessive acidic condensation

Power cylinder corrosion

Rapid deterioration of lube oil

Reliability and durability compromisedSlide13

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

20% increase Higher EGR flow: Multiple EGR coolers on & off engine Larger vehicle cooling package

Major redesign of radiator / Charge Air Cooler / Fan systems

Significant Increase in Heat RejectionSlide14

Complex System Integration

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

Higher EGR flow

Air handling system

Vehicle cooling systemSlide15

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

Higher EGR FlowThrottle Response

Driver Satisfaction Significantly CompromisedSlide16

In Cylinder NOx Control Challenges

Deterioration of 50 – 100 hp for same displacement

Higher EGR flow & EGR controls

compromises

engine performance

Power Density and Torque LimitationsSlide17

Clean Air

DOC

DPF

Bus Owners Have Two Choices for 2010

Advanced EGR

EGR + SCR After-Treatment System Setup

Tank

Catalyst

Doser

AMOX Cat

DOC

DPF

Intercooler

Higher heat rejection:

Larger Radiator

Larger Charge air cooler

RadiatorSlide18

Emissions Control Technology

NOx

is converted into N2 and H20 downstream from the engine using a diesel exhaust fluid catalyst

Exhaust gas is re-circulated through the

cylinders reducing peak combustion temperature,

lowering

NOx

emissions

SCR allows for a lower EGR run rate, increasing fuel economy and engine life

With emission controls moved out of and away from the engine, power generation is unhindered

EGR introduces excessive carbon and soot into the cylinder, causing pre-mature liner and piston wear

Higher EGR cooling capacity strains the cooling system, leading to shorter coolant change intervals and component failureSlide19

19

The Facts about the Fluid – DEF Properties

DEF is safe to handle and store

Non-toxic

Non-polluting

Non-flammable

DEF freezes at 12° F (-11° C). However, frozen DEF does not impact start up and normal operation of the vehicle

When stored at extreme temperatures, neither DEF nor Urea become toxic

DEF is slightly alkaline with a pH of approximately 9

Acidic pH

DEFSlide20

DEF - Myths & Facts

Navistar’s claim of ammonia level being close to 1000 ppm in a near empty DEF tank is a ‘stretch of imagination’ DEF, when heated and maintained at a constant

temperature 120 degrees Fahrenheit, will very slowly

start to form small amounts of ammonia

It would take over two years at this constant temperature to convert DEF into levels of 1000 ppm of ammonia

Such a situation can be probably modeled in ‘laboratory setting’ but not in the real worldSlide21

Cummins ISB6.7 vs Navistar MaxxForce 7

Competitive ComparisonSlide22

Cummins ISB6.7 vs. MaxxForce 7

Feature

Cummins Advantage

Displacement

6.7L

6.4L

-

Configuration

Inline 6

V-8

Fewer parts /

better reliability

Horsepower

200 - 325 HP

200 - 300 HP

Better power

density

Torque

520 -750 lb-ft

560 - 660 lb-ft

Better power

density

Aspiration

One - variable geometry turbo

(2) dual stage

turbos

Fewer parts /

better reliability

Oil change

interval

15,000 mi.

(24,000 km)

10,000 mi.

(16,000

km)

Lower maintenance cost / better uptime

Engine weight (dry)

1,150 lb (522 kg)

1,225 lb. (556 kg)

Lower weightSlide23

Feature

Cummins ISB6.7

Advantage

MaxxForce 7

Complexity

Single VG turbo, single radiator &

charge air cooler

Dual

turbos, multiple charge air coolers and radiators, large EGR cooler

Emission Controls

Diesel Particulate Filter and Selective Catalytic Reduction

Diesel Particulate Filter and Advanced EGR

Maintenance and Service

15,000 mile service intervals

and 3,500 authorized service locations

10,000 service intervals and 900 authorized service locations

Competitive Comparison SummarySlide24

Designing For the School Bus Market

Reliability

Total cost of ownership

Low maintenance

Safe Operation

Sociability

Performance

Weight/space

Minimal driver training

Ease of operation

Information systems

Emissions complianceSlide25

Cummins Diesel PowerSlide26

ISB6.7 & ISC8.3 Features

Improved combustion systemAdvanced VGT TurbochargerImproved cooled-EGR subsystem/cooling circuit

Fully integrated electronic controls

New Cummins Aftertreatment SystemSlide27

ISB6.7 & ISC8.3 Customer Benefits

Best-in-Class Fuel EconomyImproved Reliability

Minimal Installation Impact

Stronger Performance

Increased Power DensitySlide28

Cummins Natural Gas PowerSlide29

ISL G Product Features and Benefits

8.9L Stoichiometric Cooled EGR engine with spark ignitionIn production since mid-2007

Low emissions

Diesel-‘like’ Performance, Reliability and Durability

Over 80% parts commonality with ISL9

Compatible with CNG, LNG, or Biomethane (RNG)

29Slide30

2010 ISL G Natural Gas

Three Way Catalyst Aftertreatment

Passive device

Packaged as a muffler

Maintenance-Free

Stoichiometric Combustion Cooled EGRSame rated speed as ISL9 diesel30% more torque at idle

5% better fuel economySlide31

Combustion

Technology

Filtration and

Diesel Exhaust Fluid

Integrating Critical Subsystems

Electronic Controls

Aftertreatment System

Turbochargers

Fuel SystemsSlide32

32

PowerSpec

Software Application

Provide gearing recommendation

Customize engine ‘specs’

Collect valuable trip information

Free to download and use

www.powerspec.cummins.comSlide33

INLINE™ adapter

Cummins datalink adapter used in conjunction with PowerSpecAllows user to: transfer feature parameter settings download trip information

INLINE™ 5 kit (part number: 4918416) includes all necessary parts to connect the vehicle to a laptop

33Slide34

Make Every TM School Bus

Better.Better

Fuel Economy.

Up to 3% better than our ’07 ISB and ISC

Joint testing underway on EPA 2010 productBetter Performance.

Improved driveability and throttle response

Better

Reliability.

Best-in-class durability and dependability

Better

for the Environment.

Near zero NOx and PM emissions

Improved MPG results in smaller carbon footprintSlide35
Slide36

Saf-T-Liner EFX

36Slide37

Common Parts with HDX means faster design cycle

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

37

Bumper

(10)

#2 Hood

(2)

Front Roof Cap

(6)

Clearance/Marker Lights

(6)

“A” Mirrors

(8)

Walk

Gate

(8)

Headlight & Bezel

(4)

Wipers

(15)

Hazard Lights

(4)

Header Height/Drip Rail

(4)

“B” Mirrors

(8)

Destination Sign

(20)

Windshield

(3)

Sub-system ID (estimated number of parts to be eliminated ~100)Slide38

Driver Focused Improvements - Storage

Added driver’s storage to right side dashCan be used for safety equipment storage or for personal items

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

38Slide39

Driver Focused Improvements - Visibility

Improved visibilityHDX windshieldLarger driver’s side windowArgosy headlightsRunning lights standard

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

39Slide40

Driver Focused Improvements - Visibility

Improved defrost capability

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

40Slide41

Technician Focused Improvements - Access

Headlight doors and removable grill provide easy service accessLightsWiper motors and linkagesWasher fluid

Power steering reservoir

Defrost heater relays

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

41Slide42

Technician Focused Improvements - Access

Lower driver side access panel for chassis PDM’s

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

42Slide43

Technician Focused Improvements – Misc.

More reliable components should translate to fewer replacementsIncreased parts commonality means less parts for technician to maintainBus can still be jacked up by front bumper

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

43Slide44

Family Look

HDX

EFX

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

44Slide45

EFX Status

00000-00-Thomas Built Buses Standard Template.ppt

45

Gate 9/8 Status: Passed (May 9th)

Gate 7/6 Status: Passed

Scheduled SOP: Q1 2012

Project Budget approved.

Bus to be showcased at NAPT in October.

Estimated start of production 1Q2012

Pilot/

Preseries

We’ll be soliciting orders within the next month

Will come with new sales codes – WebEx will be scheduled to assist in ordering process

Will come with $300 cost increase

Design Validation

Cooling passed.

FEA and fatigue analysis in progress.

Defrost testing planned for early October

6000 mile durability to begin mid-September at Bosch Proving Grounds.Slide46

Questions?

46

Thomas Built Buses Dealer Sales Meeting 2012