PPT-Analytics on Courts,

Author : tawny-fly | Published Date : 2017-10-27

J udges and Firms Centre on the Legal Profession Deakin Law School Melbourne Australia Kerry Kassam Product Counsel Ravel Law MOTION OUTCOMES MOTION OUTCOMES

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Analytics on Courts," is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Analytics on Courts,: Transcript


J udges and Firms Centre on the Legal Profession Deakin Law School Melbourne Australia Kerry Kassam Product Counsel Ravel Law MOTION OUTCOMES MOTION OUTCOMES FILTER APPLIED TOPIC FILTERS. The main role of the courts is to resolve disputes. Precedent develops as judges reach decisions in the disputes heard by the courts, and laws are made as a result. In this sense, law-making is a by-product of the dispute resolution procedures undertaken by the courts. Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender . Change. James M. Byrne, . Professor. March 26,2015. The Drug Court Movement. Number of Drug Courts. . :. As of June 2014, the estimated number of drug courts operating in the U.S. is over . The lower federal courts, beneath the Supreme Court.. Jurisdiction. The authority of a court to hear a case.. Exclusive Jurisdiction. Power of the federal courts alone to hear certain cases.. Concurrent Jurisdiction. Dr. Elke Schwager. Overview. Legal . Background in Germany. Situation . in Bavaria. Case . Study. Outlook. Mediation in Bavarian Courts. page. . 2. Legal Background in Germany. Law of Mediation of 21 June . 2014 Summer Conference. 1. Creative Collections for courts. Hon. Paula O’Neil, PH.D (Pasco County, Clerk & Comptroller). Importance of automation for collections. 2. Creative Collections for courts. Evaluate . two. weaknesses of mediation as a dispute resolution method (4 marks) . Evaluation . of how courts resolve disputes. This is different to an evaluation of . courts as lawmakers. Here, we are looking at strengths and weaknesses of how courts (and VCAT – a comparison really) resolve disputes, not of how they make law. . J. Matias Tafoya. Presiding Judge. Mesa Municipal Court. Elizabeth R. Finn. Presiding Judge. Glendale City Court. Rule 11 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure. Cannot be tried for criminal offense if:. is the use of:. data, . information technology, . statistical analysis, . quantitative methods, and . mathematical or computer-based models . to help managers gain improved insight about their business operations and . Dr. Brett M. Baker, AIG for Audit, NRC OIG. Manuel J. Mireles, Forensic Auditor, NGA OIG. Shiji S. Thomas, Forensic Accountant, NSF OIG. Analytics 101 Outline. At the end of this session you will be able to understand:. Objective; Define the kinds of lower federal courts in the United States.. The Constitution created the Supreme Court.. Congress established the . lower . federal courts.. These courts are of two basic . State . Federal . Introduction: Federal and state courts. The . U.S. Constitution created a government system for the United States known as . federalism. . Federalism is the sharing of powers between the national government and the state governments. . What is a Bureaucracy?. A bureaucracy is defined as the complex structure of offices, tasks, rules, and principles of organization that are employed by all large-scale institutions to coordinate the work of their personnel.. is the use of:. data, . information technology, . statistical analysis, . quantitative methods, and . mathematical or computer-based models . to help managers gain improved insight about their business operations and . 4 Main features of the relationship between Parliament and the Courts. The interpretation of statutes by courts. The codification of common law. The abrogation of common law. The ability of courts to influence parliament..

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Analytics on Courts,"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents