/
Evaluation of Self-Defence Evaluation of Self-Defence

Evaluation of Self-Defence - PowerPoint Presentation

tawny-fly
tawny-fly . @tawny-fly
Follow
455 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-03

Evaluation of Self-Defence - PPT Presentation

Main Criticisms Argument that law favours the defendant Relevance of Defendants characteristics Reasonable force Law Favours the Defendant D mistaken as to circumstances Gladstone Williams ID: 544340

force defence act reasonable defence force reasonable act law circumstances cases justice criminal 2008 mistake defend immigration characteristics person

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Evaluation of Self-Defence" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Evaluation of Self-DefenceSlide2

Main Criticisms

Argument that law favours the defendant

Relevance of Defendant’s characteristics

Reasonable forceSlide3

Law Favours the Defendant

D mistaken as to circumstances

Gladstone Williams

– allows defence for those who defend themselves whilst being mistaken to the circumstances, providing mistake is honest one

Recognises that sometimes a quick reaction is needed or that people may not be fully rational when afraid

S. 76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008

– provided the mistake was not made due to intoxication, D can rely on his mistake

2. No duty to retreat

Bird

– unnecessary to show an unwillingness to fight. There are circumstances where D may act without first retreating

Beckford

– circumstances may justify a pre-emptive strike

3. D may be original aggressor

Keane and McGrath

– defence can be pleaded where D is original aggressor, V’s response is disproportionate and D retaliates Slide4

Relevance of

D’s Characteristics

Should D’s characteristics be taken into account when considering whether D thought it was necessary to defend himself?

Martin

– court held that psychiatric evidence that D had a condition that meant that he perceived much greater danger than the average person was not relevant to the question of whether D had used reasonable force

Cairns

– when deciding whether D had used reasonable force in self-defence it was not appropriate to take into account whether D was suffering from a psychiatric condition which may have caused him to have a delusion that he was about to be attacked

Difficult to know whether these decisions are still effective following

Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008

that makes it clear that question of whether the degree of force is reasonable is decided by reference to the circumstances as D believed them to be Slide5

Reasonable Force

Palmer

– force does not have to be exactly proportionate and “a person defending himself cannot weigh to a nicety the exact measure f his necessary defensive action”

But many high profile cases where D has been unsuccessful because the force used was excessive

Martin

– farmer who shot dead a burglar and was found guilty of murder led to high profile media campaign to clarify the law

Prior to partial defence of Loss of Control – key criticism on self-defence cases was that if the defence fails in a murder case because it is an all-or-nothing defence, D faces a mandatory life sentence. Slide6

Attempts to

Clarify the Law

Coroners and Justice Act 2009

alleviates the problem of self-defence being an all-or-nothing defence by providing a partial defence of loss of control that can be pleaded in cases where D may use excessive force because of fear of serious violence – reduces conviction to voluntary manslaughter

S. 76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008

– does not aim to change the law but it puts the rules of law established through case law into a statutory format

S. 148 Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012

– to provide greater reassurance to householders about exercising their rights, by making it clear that a person can use reasonable force to defend property and that he is under no legal duty to retreat

Crime and Courts Act 2013

– gives a wider defence to householders when an intruder enters their property – degree of force will not be regarded as reasonable only where it was “grossly disproportionate” as opposed to “disproportionate” in other cases