/
O  VI O  VI

O VI - PowerPoint Presentation

tawny-fly
tawny-fly . @tawny-fly
Follow
373 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-25

O VI - PPT Presentation

Absorbers at z 23 Photoionized by Quasars or Tracers of Hot Gas Andrew Fox ESOChile Jacqueline Bergeron amp Patrick Petitjean IAPParis H I H II Si III Si ID: 377845

amp absorbers 2000 qso absorbers amp qso 2000 gas proximity hot strong weak bergeron high 2007 ionization offsets 200

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "O VI" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

O VI Absorbers at z=2-3Photoionized by Quasars or Tracers of Hot Gas?

Andrew Fox (ESO-Chile)

Jacqueline Bergeron & Patrick

Petitjean

(IAP-Paris)Slide2

H

I

–H

II

Si III-Si IV C III-C IV He II-He III N IV-N V O V-O VI

Metal lines as tracers of ionization level

13.6

eV 33.5 eV 47.9 eV 54 eV 77.9 eV 113.9 eV

O

VI advantages: O VI is most highly ionized line available in rest-frame UV Oxygen is most abundant metal in Universe O VI doublet at 1031, 1037 Å is intrinsically strong

O VI disadvantage: O VI falls in Ly-a forest  blending/contamination. Only detectable at z2-3.

EnergySlide3

O VI

absorbers have power-law column density distribution (Bergeron & Herbert-Fort 2005)

Associated

” or “proximate” absorbers (at dv<5000 km s-1 from QSO) often removed from sample  affected by ionization conditions close to QSO. This talk: Examine this practice (Fox, Bergeron, & Petitjean 2008, MNRAS)VLT/UVES, Keck/HIRES studies Schaye et al. 2000 Bergeron et al. 2002 Carswell

et al. 2002 Simcoe et al. 2002,2004,2006

Levshakov et al. 2003 Reimers et al. 2001, 2006

Bergeron & Herbert-Fort 2005 Lopez et al. 2007 Gonçalves et al. 2008O VI probes

IGM ionization and enrichmentIs there a proximity effect in O

VI?Slide4

VLT/UVES Large Program

20 QSOs, high resolution (FWHM 6.6 km s

-1

) and high S/N (~40–60)

Searched for O VI absorbers within 8000 km s-1 of zQSO.zQSO is determined from several QSO emission lines, allowing for systematic shifts (Tytler & Fan 1992)35 proximate O VI systems detected:26 weak systems9 strong systemsUVES Spectra

-200 0 km/s 200

-200 0 km/s 200Slide5

Two Populations of Proximate O VI

WEAK

log

N

(O VI)≤14.5

Weak

N V

and C IV

1 or 2 components

Velocities < zQSO

No evidence for partial coverageSTRONG log N(O VI) ≥ 15 Strong N V and C IV Multiple components

Velocities clustered around

z

QSO

Occasional evidence for partial coverage of continuum source.

Truly intrinsic: inflow/outflow near AGN central engine (several mini-BALs)Slide6

“Proximity Effect”: change in dN/dz at 2000 km s-1

Proximity zone extends over ~2000 km s

-1

, not 5000 km s

-1.Intervening systems(Bergeron & Herbert-Fort 2005)Slide7

Weak O VI absorbers: trends with proximity

At 2000 km s

-1

, see change in

N(H I) and in N(C IV) but not in N(O VI)Slide8

Furthermore, O VI/HI offsets are observed

Significant

velocity

centroid offsets

between O VI and H I are seen in ~50% of the weak O VI absorbers  two ions are not co-spatial. (similar fraction of low-z O VI absorbers show offsets; Tripp et al. 2008)Slide9

Median b-values O

VI

<2000 km s

-1

from QSO: b=12.3 km s-1 Intervening O VI: b =12.7 km s-1  T <1.6x105 K Intervening N V: b =6.0 km s-1

(Fechner & Richter 2009) O VI

and N V trace different regions

O VI Component Line Width Distribution

b

=(2kT/m +

b2non-thermal)Slide10

O

VI

absorbers (even narrow) may not be

photoionized

; can be formed in non-equilibrium cooling gasResults of Gnat & Sternberg (2007)Frozen-in ionization can lead to O VI being present in gas down to ~104 K if the metallicity is close to solarSlide11

Are there any physical reasons why such hot gas should exist at z=2-3?

YES: Galactic Winds

YES: Hot-mode accretion

Simulations from

Kawata & Rauch (2007)Simulations from Dekel & Birnboim (2007)See also

Fangano, Ferrara, & Richter (2007)Slide12

Comparison of high-ion ratiosObservations

vs

theory (Gnat & Sternberg)

Cooling gas models can explain data

if elemental abundance ratios are non-solar:Need -1.8<[N/O]<0.4 -1.9 <[C/O]<0.6Slide13

Single-phase photoionization models for IGM O VI absorbers are too simplistic, becauseO VI-H

I

velocity offsets imply O

5+

and H0 occupy different regionsO5+ may be collisionally- rather than photo-ionizedDon’t know EGB shape above 100 eV that wellUse caution when combining O VI/H I ratio + CLOUDY  IGM metallicity

Implications for O VI absorbers in general

H

0

, O

5+

, T~104 KH0, T~104 K

O

5+

,

T

~10

5

K

O

6

+

, O

7+

T

10

6

K

EGB

What you see in H

I

What you see in O

VISlide14

2000 km/s Proximity

Warm plasma

photoionized

as you approach z(QSO), not hot plasma

QSO

N(H I)~10

15

N(O VI)~10

13.5

N(H I

)~10

14

N(O VI)~10

13.5Slide15

Almost 1

dex

uncertainty in

Jn at 113.9 eV!!!Simcoe et al. (2004)Slide16

Sawtooth modulation by He II Lyman series exacerbates the situation

Madau

&

Haardt

(2009)We don’t really know what’s happening out here!Slide17

In 20 high-quality QSO spectra from UVES, we search for O VI within 8000 kms-1 of zQSO

, finding

9

strong

absorbers (truly intrinsic, gas near AGN)26 weak absorbersAmong weak O VI absorbers:dN/dz increases by factor of 3 inside 2000 km s-1dN/dz in range 2000-8000 km s-1 matches intervening.N(H I) and N(C IV) show a proximity effect (dependence on

Dv), N(O VI

) does not.O VI-H I

velocity centroid offsets imply at least half the absorbers are multiphase.Cannot use O VI absorbers to probe high-energy tail of EGB: too many systematic uncertainties. Narrow O VI can form in radiatively-cooling hot gas, in interface regions that result from galactic winds/hot-mode accretion

Survey for Proximate O VI: SummarySlide18
Slide19
Slide20

Partial Coverage of Continuum SourceSlide21

O VI absorber size is <200 kpc, based on lack of Hubble broadening.

Simcoe et al. 2002Slide22

Strong O VI: Yes, we see strong O VI clustered around z

QSO

Weak O

VI

: Yes, we see dN/dz increase by a factor of three within 2000 km s-1 (but galaxies are clustered near quasars).No, the internal properties (b-values, log N) of the O VI absorbers do not depend on Dv, unlike H I and C IVIs there a line-of-sight proximity effect in O VI?

Is there

observational evidence (at

z

=2-3) for an extended (~10

Mpc) QSO proximity zone of E>100

eV photons?No: properties of weak O VI do not require photons at E>100 eV

(you can create the O

VI

with [cooled] hot gas)Slide23

C IV ionization fraction in hot gas Proximity zone extends over ~2000 km s

-1

, not 5000 km s

-1

.convert QSO B-magnitude and zQSO to L912 (Rollinde et al. 2005)Determine size of “Stromgren Sphere” where QSO radiation density exceeds estimated EGB radiation density at z=2.5 ( ~10 Mpc)Convert size to velocity assuming Hubble Flow and H(z=2.5)=250 km s-1 Mpc

-1 (1500-2500 km s-1)

Related Contents


Next Show more