/
Questions round 1 (what and why?) Questions round 1 (what and why?)

Questions round 1 (what and why?) - PowerPoint Presentation

tawny-fly
tawny-fly . @tawny-fly
Follow
364 views
Uploaded On 2018-01-23

Questions round 1 (what and why?) - PPT Presentation

Is the purpose of current MampR requirements at EU level clear and justified Are the requirements clear in relation to why report and what to report What initiatives are participants aware of that address specific problems eg examples of best practice showing positive chang ID: 626347

reporting requirements questions amp requirements reporting amp questions level information problems specific report clear prtr examples works fuel reported

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Questions round 1 (what and why?)" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Questions round 1 (what and why?)

Is the purpose of current M&R requirements at EU level clear and justified?

Are the requirements clear in relation to ‘why report’ and ‘what to report’?

What initiatives are participants aware of that address specific problems? (e.g. examples of best practice showing positive changes)

What else might be done to reduce problems on M&R requirements?Slide2

Questions round 1 (what and why?)

Definitions, categorisationsAnnex 1, Facility versus installation, SOx - SO2, fuel sold – fuel used, CRF versus NFRINSPIRE Double reporting Waste (E-PRTR and …) , NEC/LRTAP, facilities: E-PRTR, ETS, UWWTP and LPSInformation available at other EU institutions, EU as reporter (Kyoto, EU MM)Information neededInformation asked that is already known (long-latitude and NUTS3 and ZIP and …)Needed to do QA/QC? Responsibility?Non mandatory itemsUseful to get the bigger pictureUseless because always incomplete, extra burden in the toolingStatus report (every 3 years)Needed to show the level of implementationCopy and pasteManagement by changeSlide3

Questions round 2 (who and how?)

Are the requirements clear in relation to who needs to report and how? Can you name any structural/ systematic issues and/or specific examples that should be considered under the reporting review? (The discussion paper mentions several issues in applying EU level M&R requirements concerning who reports and how reporting is undertaken, including: the same information needs to be reported several times to different audiences; the same information needs to be reported in different formats; M&R specifications are not communicated timely enough so efficient monitoring process does not take place; collecting information is unnecessarily burdensome or leading to very high costs. What initiatives are participants aware of that address specific problems? (e.g. examples of best practice showing positive changes) What else might be done to reduce problems on M&R requirements? Slide4

Questions round 2 (who and how?)

Centralised reporting structure in the MS versus decentralisedConsistent but complexIntegrated reporting from the operatorsBack to back EU expert meetings (nobody has the whole picture)Integration of deliverables of comparable obligations (NEC/LRTAP with UNFCCC)Works well for E-PRTR, LCP, IED and its toolingToolingVariation (Webforms, XML, XLS, DOC, CRF-reporter)EIONET works well, state of the art?Report once, multiple usage, by law!Collecting versus submittingTimingOn facility level versus national total (you need facilities to calculate the national total)Data consistency, one date (snapshot)