/
1 Searching for K 0   1 Searching for K 0  

1 Searching for K 0  - PowerPoint Presentation

taylor
taylor . @taylor
Follow
64 views
Uploaded On 2024-01-13

1 Searching for K 0  - PPT Presentation

μ μ π π Decays Michael D Sokoloff Initial interest small Q value allows precise measurement of K 0 mass reducing systematic uncertainties related to momentum scale uncertainty ID: 1040212

mev amp sokoloff data amp mev data sokoloff 2013michael 2012 october stripping 2011 requirement cuts muon studied code line

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 Searching for K 0 " is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. 1Searching for K0  μ-μ+π-π+ DecaysMichael D. SokoloffInitial interest – small Q-value allows precise measurement of K0 mass, reducing systematic uncertainties related to momentum scale uncertainty.Guesstimated BF(K0  π-π+μ+μ-) ~ 10-8 based on other branching fractions and phase space.BF(KS  π-π+) ~ 0.69BF(KS  π-π+γ) ~ 1.8 x 10-3BF(KS  π-π+e+e-) ~ 4.8 x 10-5Giancarlo D’Ambrosio calculates SM contribution to BF(KS  π-π+μ+μ-) ~ 4 x 10-14. This offers the possibility that this decay could probe New Physics.Guesstimate how many KS are produced in a “year” of running LHCb: (5 x 106 sec/year) x (1 MHz L0) x (μ = 1.6) x (1 KS per event) ~ 1013 KS per year.

2. Work To Date2Hlt2 trigger line deployed following August 2012 TS.Corresponding stripping line run on 2011 and 2012 data, no TOS requirement.2011 MagnetDown data (~ 400 pb-1) studied.Core elements of stripping code _combcut = "(AM < %(MaxKsMass)s *MeV) & "\ (550 MeV) "(AMAXDOCA('')<%(DMAXDOCA)s) & " \ (0.2 mm) "(AM34 < %(MaxDimuonMass)s *MeV) &"\ (260 MeV) "(AHASCHILD( (MIPCHI2DV(PRIMARY)>%(KsDauMAXIPCHI2)s) ) )" %locals() (15) [might relax this requirement in 2015] _mothercut = "(VFASPF(VCHI2/VDOF) < %(DVCHI2DOF)s) & "\ "(PT > %(DPT)s *MeV) &"\ (2500 MeV) [might relax this requirement in 2015] "(M < %(KsMotherMassCut)s *MeV) &"\ 540 MeV "(BPVVDCHI2>%(DFDCHI2)s) & (BPVIPCHI2()< %(DIPCHI2)s) & "\ (9 & 20) "(BPVDIRA > %(DDIRA)s)" % locals() (0.9999) Muon selection includes (PIDmu-PIDpi > %(MuonPIDmu_CS_hhmumu)s) (-1) October 2, 2013Michael D Sokoloff

3. Muon ID studied using J/ψ candidates3Stripping Level4271 +- 147ProbNNmu > 0.054440 +- 126ProbNNmu > 0.104458 +- 121ProbNNmu > 0.204331 +- 105ProbNNmu > 0.354093 +- 93October 2, 2013Michael D Sokoloff

4. K0  μ-μ+π-π+ Candidates4Observationsentries with loosest cuts suggest lack of blatant bugs.entries with tighter cuts are consistent with removing hadrons misidentified as muons.October 2, 2013Michael D Sokoloff

5. Moving Forward5Run trigger/stripping/analysis code on Monte Carlo to determine efficiencies.Study normalization channel (KS  π-π+); MC and data.Analyze remaining untriggered 2011 & 2012 data; then triggered 2012 data.October 2, 2013Michael D Sokoloff