Adult Behavioral Health Task Force October 16 2015 Presented by Rick Weaver CoChair Membership Mental Health Treatment Providers Substance Abuse Treatment Providers Community Health Clinics ID: 462200
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Full Integration/Early Adopter Work Grou..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Full Integration/Early Adopter Work Group
Adult Behavioral Health Task ForceOctober 16, 2015
Presented by:
Rick Weaver, Co-ChairSlide2
Membership
Mental Health Treatment ProvidersSubstance Abuse Treatment Providers
Community
Health Clinics
NAMI
County
Representatives
Regional
Support Networks
Local
Public Health
Health
Plan Representatives
Agency
(DSHS/HCA) staff
Legislative
Staff Slide3
November Recommendations
Executive agencies should build service reimbursement rates that support integrated care models. Agencies, purchasers, and providers should actively pursue statewide policies and funding to support the workforce development
activities
DSHS and HCA should share procurement documents and draft contracts developed for early adopter regions with the Early Adopter/Full Integration Work Group for comment before they are releasedSlide4
November Recommendations
DSHS and HCA should lead a process to align regulations across CD/MH/primary care in order to reduce administrative burdens.The state should consider a phased approach to full integration that has timelines flexible enough to allow regions to proceed at various paces.
State
agencies should develop a data system/data sharing plan and funding mechanism to allow for real time data sharing.Slide5
June Recommendations
There remain a wide range of concerns about timing in this journey. For example current plans call for contracting out of cycle with fiscal years.
Sooner, rather than later the task force/legislature should review and make certain the timelines for this effort
.
There is a gap between the end of the task force and the current full implementation date (2020). The workgroup believes:
There is a need for a forum for on-going into or oversight of the activities leading to full integration
There is great value in the cross-sector interaction present in the workgroup to provide input to plans and to monitor/support the results as those plans are implemented. There is interest in continuing the workgroup for those purposes
.Slide6
Current Recommendations
The work group intends to further clarify its recommendations and to provide examples and potential action steps where those might not be clearInadequate rates are a major challenge to the system
While there are issue with reserves in some regions, cutting rates to the bottom of the rate band
has serious implications for service delivery and in particular the ability to attract and retain workforce.
MCO rates in the Apple Health program currently impair the ability to develop adequate networks and to provide behavioral health benefits to membersSlide7
Current Recommendations
Consistent with our June recommendation for clarity on process and timelines we recommend that the Task Force asks the HCA to provide a detailed roadmap that includes:An inventory of integration activities occurring statewide
A phased timeline that acknowledges that:
regions might lie to move to full integration later than the present early adopter timeline but sooner than the 2020 date
Regions might want to move to full integration in phased steps rather than all at once
Assesses the readiness of regions to meet the 2020 date and provides recommendations for new dates if there are regions that cannot meet that timeline.
Outlines models that may be possible for those regions that wish to proceed earlier or in a more stepped mannerSlide8
Current Recommendations
We continue to believe that there is a continued need for this type of forum beyond the expiration of the task force.We are exploring possible synergy with the efforts of the HILN as one avenue for this to occur.
We plan to further inform the Task Force of our thinking and recommendations on this topic at the November meeting.