/
Neural Stem Cell Biology Neural Stem Cell Biology

Neural Stem Cell Biology - PowerPoint Presentation

test
test . @test
Follow
556 views
Uploaded On 2016-12-04

Neural Stem Cell Biology - PPT Presentation

Postnatal neurogenesis discovery Neural stem cell discovery Embryonic NSCs Adult NSCs BCHGGB512 Richard Gronostajski History of postnatal neurogenesis discovery http wwwnaturecom nrn ID: 497146

cell cells brdu neurogenesis cells cell neurogenesis brdu neural stem adult gfap neurons green process labeled nestin positive generated arrow sorted vitro

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Neural Stem Cell Biology" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Neural Stem Cell Biology

Postnatal neurogenesis discoveryNeural stem cell discoveryEmbryonic NSCsAdult NSCs

BCH/GGB512 Richard GronostajskiSlide2

History of postnatal neurogenesis discovery

http://

www.nature.com

/

nrn

/journal/v1/n1/

pdf

/nrn1000_067a.pdfSlide3

History of postnatal neurogenesis discovery

1800s-1950s no way of measuring proliferation other than mitosis

Saw occasional mitoses but couldn't tell if they were neurons

1950s H3 thymidine first used in vivo

1961 3H

TdR

first applied to adult brain (I. Smart) saw new neurons in 3 day old mice, not adults

1960 (Joseph Altman) 3H

TdR

adult rats, saw labeling in cortex, hippocampus, olfactory bulb.

Ignored for almost 40 years (bias against Altman, he got the last word, didn't get tenure at MIT, did at Purdue)Slide4

History of postnatal neurogenesis discovery

Injected P20+21, harvested P60

http://

braindevelopmentmaps.orgSlide5

History of postnatal neurogenesis discovery

1960 (Joseph Altman) 3H TdR adult rats, saw labeling in cortex, hippocampus, olfactory bulb.

Ignored for almost 40 years

1977 Michael Kaplan's EM studies confirmed neurogenesis.

1985-88

Pasko

Rakic's

papers found "little or no" adult neurogenesis.

1988 Stanfield and Trice showed adult neurogenesis with fluorescent tracer + 3H

TdR

1997-99 Fred Gage and coworkers used BrdU and cell-type markers

1999

Rakic

showed neurogenesis with BrdU incorporation and cell-type specific markers.Slide6

Postnatal neurogenesis

FIG. 2. Newly generated cells in the adult macaque dentate gyrus express neuronal phenotypic markers 32 days after five BrdU injections, as detected by immunofluorescence double-label and confocal microscopy. (a–d) Neurons in the dentate gyrus express NeuN (red). The same cell in the GCL that is labeled with BrdU (arrow, green in b) also expresses NeuN (arrow, a). (c and d) An example of a BrdU-labeled nucleus (d, arrow, green) that did not emit a red fluorescence signal (c, arrow), demonstrating that the BrdU fluorescent signal did not ‘‘bleed’’ into the red channel; this might be a progenitor or new glial cell. (e and f ) A TuJ1-positive cell in the SGZ (arrow, red)

colabels

with BrdU in its nucleus ( f, arrow, green). Note the slender process (arrowheads) emanating from the cell body, resembling the trailing process of a newly generated migrating neuron. The BrdU in its nucleus confirms its recent generation. (g and h) Two cells in the SGZ expressing TuJ1 in the cytoplasm surrounding their nuclei (red), which are

immunopositive

for BrdU (h, green). Their close proximity suggests that these two cells might be newly generated ‘‘siblings.’’ The long thin process (arrowheads), consistent with migratory behavior, is clearly seen in one of the cells. (

i

and j) A bipolar cell in the SGZ

coexpressing

TuJ1 (green) and nuclear BrdU (j, orange). Although most double-labeled cells were oriented radially in the GCL, occasionally a cell was oriented parallel to the GCL. This example shows such a BrdU-labeled cell with an extended process on either side of the nucleus. (k) A TuJ1-positive cell (green, arrow) with a BrdU-positive nucleus (orange) has an immature migratory appearance. Note the thin trailing process (arrowheads) and a nearby BrdU-negative neuron, with a mature, apical process (arrow–cross). (l) A cell deep in the GCL

colabels

with TuJ1 (green) and BrdU (orange) with an apical process that is thick and tortuous, similar to the dynamic, exploratory leading process of a migrating neuron (its trailing process is out of the optical plane). Compare this with the straighter apical process of the more mature BrdU-

immunonegative

granule neuron in k (arrow–cross). [Bar (a–l) 5 10 mm.]

Neurobiology:

Kornack

and

Rakic

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 5771Slide7

Major reasons for 40 year delay

Lack of good markers for both proliferation and cell types.Bias against the idea.Slide8

Neural Stem Cells in vitroSlide9

Neural Stem Cells in vitro

Fig. 1. EGF-induced proliferation of cells isolated from the adult mouse striatum.

(A)

After 2 DIV, cells that had undergone cell division were first observed. Cell division continued at 3

(B)

and 4-

(C

) DIV, although dividing cells beginning to form a cluster migrated slowly across the substrate.

(D)

After 6 to 8 DIV, spheres of cells lifted off the substrate and floated in suspension. Line in substrate (A through C) serves to identify the field.

(E)

One hour after plating onto poly-L-ornithine, a 6 DIV sphere attached to the substrate.

(F)

The cells in (E) were immunostained

with antibody to nestin; virtually all cells were

immunoreactive

for nestin.

Self renewal shown(G through J) Single cells, derived from dissociated 6- to 8-DIV spheres, were plated in

single wells of a 96-well plate; A

large, hypertrophic cell after 2DIV

(G)

began to divide and form cluster of cells during the subsequent

3

(H)

, 4

(I)

, and 6

(J)

DIV.

Scratches

in

substrate serve to idenitifythe field. Scale bars: (A through D) bar in (D) denotes 50 um (E), 50 um; (F), 25 um; (G through J) bar in (J), 50 um.

NeurospheresSlide10

Neural Stem Cells in vitro

FIG. 1. Morphology of neurons generated by culturing adult brain cells with bFGF and then with medium conditioned by Ast-1 cells. Neurons stained by immuno-fluorescence for expression of 150-kDa neurofilament (b, d, f, and h) have various morphologies and, as shown by phase-contrast

micrography

, their nuclei are labeled with [3H]thymidine (arrows in a, c, e, and g). The silver grains are more easily seen in g, where the plain of focus is at the emulsion level. (a-f x280; g and h X450.)Slide11

Neural Stem Cells in vitroSlide12

Neurosphere assay

Primary neurospheres may measure stem and progenitor cells. Initial passage.Secondary neurospheres may measure stem cells. Second passage.Assay controversial, spheres split or merge, best to make at limiting dilution.Slide13

Question everything you read!

Lack of good markers for both proliferation and cell types.Bias against an idea doesn't mean it isn't true. What is the evidence?Slide14

Modified from:

Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial-cell specification. Rowitch DH, Kriegstein

AR. Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):214-22

Blue cells

- stem cells

Green cells

- intermediate progenitor cells

Orange cells

– neuronal progenitors and neurons

Nestin

-

GFAP

-

GLAST

+

Nestin

+

, GFAP

+

Pax6

+

Tbr2

+

Nestin

+

GFAP

+

Pax6

+

DCX

+

Subgranular zone

hippocampus

Summary of embryonic and adult neurogenesis

Protoplasmic or fibrous astrocytes

A

B

C

Gliogenic

SwitchSlide15

EvidenceSlide16

GFAP-GFP transgene expression

E16

E14

GFAP-GFP transgene is expressed in GLAST+ cells that form radial patternSlide17

Sorted GFP+ and put in culture

GFAP-GFP+ cells made neurons, glia and mixed colonies when put into culture of 5-7 days. Some contaminating neurons present in starting materialSlide18

Fig. 3. Examples of the progeny of hGFAP-GFP- and GLAST positive precursor cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Cells were sorted from E14 (A-H) and E18 (I,J) mouse cortex by green fluorescent protein content driven from the human GFAP promoter. The sorted cells were cultured for 5-7 days. In C-J, sorted cells were cultured on a rat cortex feeder layer of the corresponding age and identified by the mouse-specific antibody M2M6 (

Lagenaur

and

Schachner

, 1981; Lund et al., 1985) (C,E,G,I). Clusters of labeled cells were considered as clones derived from a single sorted precursor cell, as illustrated in the overview in C,D. Cell-type specific antibodies were used as indicated in the panels to identify the composition of the clones. Pure neuronal clones were composed exclusively of b-tubulin-III-positive cells extending

neurites

marked by arrows (E,F). Neurons were generated in vitro and incorporated BrdU (red in B). An example of a non-neuronal clone generated from E14 precursors containing a GFAP-positive cell (filled arrowhead) is depicted in G,H. (I,J) A non-neuronal clone composed exclusively of GFAP-positive astrocytes generated by cells sorted from E18 cortex.

Filled arrowheads indicate double-labeled cells, open arrowheads indicate single-labeled cells in corresponding micrographs. Note that GLAST-positive precursor cells generate neurons and astrocytes in two separate lineages. Scale bars: 25um.

Types of colonies made

in vitroSlide19

Patterns of embryonic neurogenesis

Neural tube E11-12

Neural tube E11-12

~E14-E15

~E14-E15Slide20

Multiple types of embryonic neural progenitors

Similar to what you saw in the retina lecture,

Interkinetic

nuclear migration

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric cell divisions!

Neural progenitor cell

not Neural Stem cell

Neural progenitor cell

not Neural Stem cellSlide21

Niches of adult neurogenesis

SVZ = Subventricular Zone, RMS = Rostral Migratory Stream, SGZ = Subgranular Zone of Dentate Gyrus

OB = Olfactory bulb,

NSC

= neural stem cell,

TAC

= transient amplifying cells (progenitors),

NB

= neuroblast

Modified from: Madeleine A. Johnson, Jessica L.

Ables

& Amelia J.

Eisch

Cell-intrinsic signals that regulate adult neurogenesis.

BMB Reports 2010

NSCs

TACs

NBs

NSCs

TACs

Derived from VZ of cortex

Newly generated Slide22

Mouse hippocampus development

HNE, hippocampal neuroepithelium

DNE, dentate neuroepithelium

CH, cortical hem

VZ, ventricular zone

1ry, primary matrix

2ry, secondary matrix

3ry, tertiary matrix

DG, dentate

gyru

D, dorsal; M, medial; V, ventral; L, lateral.Slide23
Slide24

Some differences between embryonic and adult neurogenesisSlide25

Birthdating of progenitors

Inject retrovirus on specific day with GFP or other label (only labels dividing cells)Follow fate of labeled cells over time

Can also use tamoxifen and Cre-ERT2 and a flox-stopped FP

Can also use BrdU or

EdU

to label cell division.

Can follow over days, weeks, months and then stain for "Birthdating marker"Slide26

Adult neurogenesisSlide27

Adult neurogenesis

SVZ to OB

Dentate Gyrus of hippocampusSlide28

Modified from:

Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial-cell specification. Rowitch DH, Kriegstein

AR. Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):214-22

Blue cells

- stem cells

Green cells

- intermediate progenitor cells

Orange cells

– neuronal progenitors and neurons

Nestin

-

GFAP

-

GLAST

+

Nestin

+

, GFAP

+

Pax6

+

Tbr2

+

Nestin

+

GFAP

+

Pax6

+

DCX

+

Subgranular zone

hippocampus

Summary of embryonic and adult neurogenesis

Protoplasmic or fibrous astrocytes

A

B

CSlide29

Quiescent vs. active Neural Stem CellsSlide30

Disposable Hippocampal Neural Stem CellsSlide31

Multiple Neural Stem Cell modelsSlide32

Summary and ongoing questions

Symmetric vs. Asymmetric cell divisionsQuiescence vs. proliferationGliogeneic Switch and "Disposable SCs"

Types of NSCs, SVZ vs. SGZ and others

Regulation by Niche

Regulation by hormones

Regulation by exercise

How do they mediate memory?

Why is there a decrease with aging?

Will they be useful for therapies?Slide33

For Next Tuesday

Read paperDo Figure Facts sheetBe ready to discuss paperLet me know what paper you'll use for your term paperNext Tuesday and Thursday, we'll go from 1-2PM, 20 minutes each paper, 15 presentation, 5 for discussion.