/
Observing Our Community: Observing Our Community:

Observing Our Community: - PowerPoint Presentation

test
test . @test
Follow
387 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-27

Observing Our Community: - PPT Presentation

The Reasons the Methodology Some Conclusions amp Some Concerns Brian Kelly UKOLN Aims monitor use of online services in order to identify patterns which can inform policies and practices ID: 493858

methodology conclusions institutional amp conclusions methodology amp institutional online research observing practices interesting identify services 2011 reasons ukoln kelly

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Observing Our Community:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Observing Our Community: The Reasons, the Methodology, Some Conclusions & Some ConcernsBrian Kelly, UKOLN

Aims: monitor use of online services in order to identify patterns which can inform policies and practices

Methodology: use online tools to record usage, typically in Russell Group universities

Examples: institutional use of Twitter, Facebook, iTunes, ..; use of research profiling services; …

PeerIndexing

rankings

How might you interpret such steady growth?

Can you spot Oxbridge

?

Jan

2011

Sep

2011

May

2012

Aug

2012

>1 million ‘likes’Slide2

Observing Our Community: The Reasons, the Methodology,

Some Conclusions & Some ConcernsBrian Kelly, UKOLNConclusions

: (1) Outliers are interesting(2) Comparisons can identify good (& bad) practices)(3) Findings may challenge IT orthodoxies

Conclusions: Further analyses would be interesting such as:

How many research papers are deposited in ResearchGate? How does this compare with institutional repositories?

Concerns

:

Survey is flawed (e.g. Google personalisation)

Interpretation is flawed

Politics

Addressed by open discussion on UK Web Focus blog