Group liaison Work on RDA processes Review of session proposals Criterias made available in the instructions for submission TABChair meeting at Plenaries Participation in the Chair Collaboration ID: 781329
Download The PPT/PDF document "TAB activities Evaluation of new Groups" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
TAB activities
Evaluation of new Groups
Group
liaison
Work
on RDA
processes
Review
of session
proposals
Criterias
made
available
in the instructions for
submission
TAB/Chair meeting at
Plenaries
Participation in the Chair Collaboration
Meeting
Slide2Criteria for session review
The
session objectives are aligned with the RDA mission and
principles
The
text provides enough information and is clear enough for possible attendants to understand the aim and content, and to decide whether to attend
The
session can be devoted to structured discussions or include slide-based presentations, but in the latter case there should be enough time for discussion to use at best the opportunity provided by a face-to-face
meeting
Link
to relevant documents is provided
The
agenda is not just a copy of the agenda of a previous meeting
Liaison
is
established
with other relevant Groups
IG
and WG sessions
:
The
WG or IG status and current activities are briefly explained and the session content is relevant
BoF
sessions
:
They
are not expected to be used to deal with a subject on the medium term - this is the role of an Interest Group
BoF
sessions
:
The
topic is sufficiently distinct from the work of existing groups or
BoFs
held at recent plenaries.
Slide3Group life cycle
WGs
Often
overdue
–
keep
the 18-month
limit
but
allow
extensions case-by-case
Some
finally
do not
provide
« acceptable » outputs
Clarify
TAB and
Secretariat
roles
in
keeping
track
of the timing
IGs
Topics
tackled
by
IGs
evolve
with
time
Charters
should
be
revisited
regularly
Chair rotation
Some
Groups are not active
any
more
In
some
cases the warning
comes
from
the Group Chairs, but not
only
Merging
, «
historical
status
»
In
some
cases issues
tackled
at the
community
level
(
often
with
support
from
TAB liaison)
«
Recommendation
adoptability
» - discussion
triggered
by
OAB/
recommendation
«
quality
»
Work
on
processes
would
be
useful
«
Work
of
RDA »
Task
Force to
be
set up by Council