NCRM Hub University of Southampton Claims to Innovation in qualitative research methods A narrative literature review 2 Context Increasing interest in methodological innovation in social sciences and arts and humanities ID: 480885
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 Rose Wiles" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
1
Rose WilesNCRM HubUniversity of Southampton
Claims to Innovation
in qualitative research methods:
A narrative literature reviewSlide2
2
ContextIncreasing interest in methodological innovation in social sciences (and arts and humanities)
Innovation (impact) important for individuals’ careers
Expectations of funders and publishers led to increase in claims to innovation
Innovation central to ensuring competitive and high impact research - the future of disciplines
Importance of identifying methods to address new social and economic challenges and patterns of social interaction
Is innovation part of ‘progress narrative’ of QR (Alasuutari, 2007) or encouraging ‘fads’ (Travers, 2009)Slide3
What is methodological innovation?Varying definitions but key elements:Should be rooted in genuine attempt to improve some aspect of the research process (not just gimmickry or innovation for innovation sake)Can comprise developments to established methods as well as new methodsShould be some level of dissemination, acceptance and take-up in the research community (Travers, 2009; Coffey and Taylor, 2008)
3Slide4
Researching Methodological InnovationQuestions for research on methodological innovationWhat is innovation? What’s the difference between a development and an innovation?Why innovate? What motivates innovation? How does the social science community respond to innovations: how are they diffused, how do they become mainstream? What difference do particular innovations make? What are the benefits?
4Slide5
Study 1: Exploring claims of innovation What claims for innovation in qualitative research have been made 2000-2009?Where is innovation being claimed: in what types of method, in which disciplines and geographical locations.On what basis is the claim to innovation made?What are the motivations given for developing these ‘innovations’?To what extent are they taken up?
5Slide6
MethodSystematic review of innovation claims in social science journals 2000-2009; narrative review of claims conducted14 journals selected Journal contents searched using innovat*, new, novel and emerg* in the title or abstractFocus on authors’ self-definition of innovation57 papers identifiedPapers reviewed and categorised Narrative analysis of claimsCitation search to explore take-up
6Slide7
Author profiles
7
Disciplines
LocationsSlide8
Methodological Areas8Slide9
Distribution across timeframe
9Slide10
Findings: motivations for innovatingMorally or ethically-driven motivation (n=22)Responses to practical challenges (n=18)Theoretically-driven motivation (n=17)
10Slide11
Findings: innovation stage – are these new innovations?Exploring the stage of development of the innovation being claimed; what was being claimed about the ‘newness’ of the innovation?Three categories identified from claimsInception (n=32)Adaptation (n=6)Adoption (n=19)
11Slide12
Narratives of claims3 broad narratives about the nature of the innovation claims‘Pushing boundaries’ claim‘Solution’ claim‘Pioneering’ claim
12Slide13
Narratives of claims‘Our claims for the validity of our methodology rely on combining standard theoretical foundations with an explicit voice from practice … it is this combination which grounds our claim to novelty’ [Dodson et al, 2007] ‘our purpose in this article is to identify and suggest resolution for two core problematics of grounded theory’ [Wasserman et al, 2009]‘it is generally recognised that cyberspace offers a new and exciting frontier for social research. It is yet to be seen how blogging can be utlised as a research technique. The aim of this article is to make an important first step in building this knowledge base’ [Hookway, 2008]
13Slide14
Findings: benefitsImportance of innovations being evaluated but no evidence from papers …In most cases, direct claims for benefits made which accorded with the motivation for the innovation few failures identifiedSome reported additional benefits
14Slide15
Take-UpCitation search undertaken using Google Scholar.Most papers had 0-3 citations 9 papers had 12+ citations (highest = 40 for paper on ethnotheatre).Higher citation rate for:Papers in the adoption categoryPapers on online and software methods/toolsA paper on validity3 papers on ethnography – auto-ethnography and ethnotheatre)
15Slide16
ConclusionSupports the finding that researchers are increasingly claiming innovation (over-claiming?)limited evidence of wholly new methods; majority appear to be adaptations or transfer from other disciplines (developments?)Study highlights e-research, participatory and creative methods as sites of innovation; innovations at interface with arts-based approaches dominate Evaluation of these innovations appears to be limited; what are the benefits of these methods?Take-up appears limited; little indication these innovation becoming mainstreamUnanswered questions? How are innovations developed, how are they disseminated, how do they become mainstream, how do the social science community respond to them ……
16Slide17
ReferenceWiles, R., Crow, G. & Pain, H. (2011) Innovation in qualitative research methods: a narrative review Qualitative Research 11,5: 587-604 17