Eastern Christianity splits from the West Questions to be addressed in this chapter What was the relation of Rome to the Eastern Church What was the filioque clause and its importance What was the Iconoclastic Controversy ID: 311328
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chapter 13" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Chapter 13
Eastern Christianity splits from the WestSlide2
Questions to be addressed in this chapter
What was the relation of Rome to the Eastern Church?
What was the
filioque
clause and its importance?
What was the Iconoclastic Controversy?
How did Eastern spirituality contribute to the separation of East and West?Slide3
Rome
claims
p
rimacy
When it became apparent that the Christian Church would be around for
a while—neither
being exterminated by persecution nor gathered up into the skies at the Second Coming of
Christ—it
institutionalized.
In
the
West,
this meant taking on the form of the Roman Empire, with one head or monarch: the Bishop of Rome (who came to be called “Pope
”).
The West’s justification for why the Bishop of Rome was
pre-eminent
rested
on two claims
:
1
. Jesus said that his Church would be built on Peter,
and
he gave Peter ultimate authority
.
2
. Peter’s authority is passed on through the office
he founded
in Rome.Slide4
Filioque
Filioque
is a Latin word which translates as “and the son.”
This
seemingly insignificant phrase became the source of a significant theological difference between East and West when taken in the context of the part of the Nicene Creed which states, “The Holy Spirit, the Lord and the Life-giver, that
proceedeth
from the Father [and the son
].”
Besides the political drama that attended the
filioque
controversy, there was a deep theological issue at stake. Central to this was how the relationships between members of the Trinity were to be conceived and explained.Slide5
Iconoclastic Controversy
Another debate which was ultimately grounded in Christology was the
Iconoclastic
Controversy.
This
was particularly important in the East because of their tradition of the use of icons in worship, but also because of the ramifications the dispute had for the developing relationship between
Church
and
State
.
The
controversy began when Emperor Leo III of the Eastern (or Byzantine) Empire, had an image of Jesus removed from the
Imperial
Palace in Constantinople in 726. Slide6
Eastern
spirituality
The
debate over icons in the East carried more than just academic or intellectual
gravitas; the
reverence and use of icons was an important way of life for people in the East
.
John of Damascus had called them “books for the illiterate”—ways in which people could be visually drawn into the mysteries of the faith.
The
Hesychasts
, a term which translates as “stillness”, maintained with the earlier
apophatic
theologians of the East
that
God cannot be known in his essence or nature. But they argued that he can be known through the energies which emanate from him.Slide7
The Jesus Prayer
“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.”Slide8
Summary of main points
1. The primacy of Rome was justified by the claims that Jesus gave authority to Peter, and Peter passed his authority on through the office he founded at Rome.
The disagreement over the
filioque
clause of the Nicene Creed cut to the heart of
diffferent
theological approaches between East and West.
3. The Iconoclastic Controversy forced further reflection of Christology and was another source of tension between East and West.
Eastern spirituality continued in the mystical tradition of earlier Christian ascetics and gradually had less and less interaction with Roman Catholicism.