Political Science 492 Progress Report 2 December 1 2010 IndoCanadian Representation in Municipal Vancouver Politics Tentative Title Outline Introduction Changes in Scope Overview Research Question ID: 513626
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Kyle Warwick" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Kyle WarwickPolitical Science 492Progress Report 2December 1, 2010
Indo-Canadian Representation in Municipal Vancouver Politics
(Tentative Title) Slide2
OutlineIntroduction (Changes in Scope, Overview)Research Question
Hypothesis
Key Concepts
Other Concepts
Methodology
Challenges and RoadblocksSlide3
Changes in EmphasisNot completely fundamental in nature
Richmond and Surrey now included as comparisons
Much less detail on historical context
Now analyzing candidate communications
Also looking at voting behaviour literature
Prescriptive solutions section essentially abandoned
Complicating the notion of elites- i.e. Party activistsSlide4
Overview/ReviewVancouver’s elected representatives historically unrepresentative
Diversity has been increasing in particular cases (Chinese at all levels, Indo-Canadians at provincial and federal levels)
Indo-Canadians still rare in municipal government
Indo-Canadians are 2
nd
largest minority in Vancouver
Unrepresentative legislature considered problematic by numerous theoristsSlide5
Research Question
What explains the continued lack of Indo-Canadians in Vancouver municipal government, given Vancouver’s recent tendency to elect (relatively) ethnically representative legislative delegations?Slide6
HypothesisVancouver’s at large system is a significant cause, due to geographic clustering of Indo-Canadians
Electoral system not the only factor, because Surrey and Richmond Councils have same electoral system, but less substantial representation gaps
Therefore, other variables at play- next slides will analyze which onesSlide7
Updates to Lit ReviewNew sources used in coming slides
Variables are not organized by book
Ravi and Krishna
Pendakur
- various
John Porter- Vertical Mosaic
Robert Putnam- Comparative Study of Political Elites
Gary Cox- Making Votes Count
Wojciech
Cwalina
et al. A Cross Cultural Theory of Voting Behaviour
Samuel J.
Eldersveld
- Political Elites in Modern Societies
Citizenship – John Stanley RoseSlide8
Primary Variables of InterestElectoral system
Social networks
Ethnic community size, concentration, unity
Voter attitudes in ethnic communities, and at large
Perceived importance of co-ethnic representationSlide9
Variables to ControlCandidate visibility/profile
Salience
of various group labels to members, and for the wider public
Generation
of immigrant i.e. 1
st
or
2
nd
Strength
of parties in given election
T
ype
of campaign strategiesSlide10
Possible Additional VariablesInfluence
of your/your parent’s home culture
D
istrict
magnitude
N
umber
of candidates
A
lphabetical order of candidates
C
ost
of political campaign
H
istory
of a given city
S
ocio-economic
status of
candidates
Unconscious racismSlide11
Additional Possible VariablesCouncil
vs
Parks
vs
School board
Policy
traceablility
Voter turnout, in ethnic communities, and wider community
Characteristics of party activists
Key causes of party cleavages
Policy traceabilitySlide12
Tentative Interview Questions
Do representatives see role as
Burkean
– do constituents agree
Do ethnic party signups stay engaged between elections
Salience of particular ethnic labels
Influence of political traditions from one’s/parents culture
Perceived importance of given offices
Relevance of co-ethnic representation
Perceived profile of certain candidates
Key political actors in given community
Ethnic activist engagement in non-election periodsSlide13
Other Operationalization Ideas
Ethnicity- super-impose census- it
is available
in detail
Voting systems- straightforward- Cox but also others
Social network- Putnam and
Eldersveld
Campaign literature analysis from
CwalinaSlide14
Challenges and SuggestionsInterview questions thus far are arguably more survey oriented- do I want more open-ended or different questions.
Which of my variables should I not worry about
Are my variables isolated, do they confound, overlap in ways I haven’t
forseen
?
Any other suggestions?