/
Local Economic Growth:  Do we know (or care) what works Local Economic Growth:  Do we know (or care) what works

Local Economic Growth: Do we know (or care) what works - PowerPoint Presentation

trish-goza
trish-goza . @trish-goza
Follow
371 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-07

Local Economic Growth: Do we know (or care) what works - PPT Presentation

September 2017 Prof Henry Overman Director What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth I am not a development expert Experience of working with UK government for nearly 20 years on local growth ID: 642266

works policy local economic policy works economic local effectiveness employment training business evidence programmes advice policies http care www

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Local Economic Growth: Do we know (or c..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Local Economic Growth: Do we know (or care) what works?

September 2017

Prof

.

Henry Overman

Director, What Works Centre for Local Economic GrowthSlide2

I am not a development expertExperience of working with UK government for (nearly) 20 years on local growth

Broad big picture (Spatial Economics Research Centre)More recently – policy details (What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth)Role of evidence in developing policies to improve growth in lagging regions: do we know or care what works?

OverviewSlide3

The UK challengeSlide4
Slide5

Growth (%)

Place

Region

1991-2001

2001-2011

Great Britain

4.1

7.5

London

London

7.2

13.1

Birmingham

W. Midlands

0.5

7.9

Stoke

W. Midlands

-0.1

3.2

Manchester

North West

-1.0

9.3

Liverpool

North West

-2.1

1.4

Newcastle

North East

-0.2

4.4

Sunderland

North East

-3.5

-1.3Slide6

Do we know (or care) what works?The big pictureSlide7

Uneven development: Economic

driversSlide8

Industry Group

Agglomeration

Average

all

manufacturing

0.077

Publishing, printing, repro of media

0.105

Advertising

0.137

Average

all

services

0.197

Motion picture, video and TV

0.222

Hotels and restaurants

0.224

Finance and insurance

0.251

Public services

0.292

Business and man. consultancy

0.298

Transport services

0.325

Manufacture radio, TV and

comms

0.382Slide9

City

Working age pop %NVQ4+ (2010)

Oxford

53.7

Cambridge

50.7

Edinburgh

47.4

Brighton

44.1

Aberdeen

43.5

London

40.9

York

39.9

Cardiff

39.8

Reading

39.6

Dundee

36.5Slide10
Slide11

Tech change and globalisationShift towards services that benefit from agglomeration

Uneven developmentReinforced

by two factors

Concentration of skilled workers

(Potential) link between concentration skilled workers and strength of agglomeration economies

Uneven developmentSlide12

Understanding uneveneconomic performanceSlide13

People versus place

Max/Min

p90/p10

p75/p25

Raw

67%

26%

11%

Full controls

16%

7%

4%Slide14

PersistenceSlide15
Slide16

Strong market forces driving uneven development

Can use government policy to reinforce or

counter

these market forces

Do we know what works?Slide17

Need realism on policy effectiveness and extent to which we can ‘re-balance’

(Incoming) governments fail to understand or recognise underlying economic factors and extent of the challenge‘Difficult’ for constituency-based

politician

Number

one

conceptual challenge when trying to help places formulate (place-based) policy?

Do we care what works?Slide18

Do we know (or care) what works?The detailed pictureSlide19

What Works Centre for Local Economic

GrowthSlide20

What Works CentreSlide21

Impact evaluationSlide22

Policy

#

Studies

SMS3

Jobs effect

Positive

Access to

Finance

1450

27

11

6

Apprenticeships

1250

27

9

7

Broadband

1000

16

10

5

Business

Advice

700

23

17

8

Employment training

1000

71

65

33

Estate renewal

1050

21

5

1

Innovation

1700

63

10

6

Public realm

1140

0

0

0

Sports and culture

550

36

16

4

Transport

2300

29

6

2

ABIs (EZs and similar)

1300

30

27

15

EU Structural

Funds

1300

18

11 (GDP)

5Slide23

Employment Training Shorter (<6 months): best for less formal trainingLonger programmes: should be skill-intensive In firm > on the job. Co-design programmes with employers

Apprenticeships Higher-level apprenticeships deliver the biggest gains More effective for employment than employment training (unless ET involves firms)Little evidence on benefits/costs to firms

People-based policies

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide24

Business advice More consistent effects on productivity than jobs Hands-on / face to face > light touch / online But we don’t have decent info on value for money

Access to business finance Impacts on productivity / wages / jobs in 50% of casesEffective at dealing with credit constraints But loan guarantees increase default risk Firm-based policies

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide25

R&D grants and loans Stronger impacts on reported innovation than on patents 7/16 studies find positive effects on wider firm performanceImpacts stronger for SMEs, and for programmes that emphasise collaboration (e.g. FP7)

R&D tax credits Very effective at raising R&D spend Little evidence on downstream economic impacts (as yet)Impacts stronger for SMEs

Firm-based policies

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide26

Broadband (fixed line, not mobile)Positive economic effects in 14/16 cases But targeted on services, skilled workers, urban places Important that firms combine IT with management changes

Transport Economic gains from road and rail projects (bigger for more congested/successful places)Productivity effects and property price gains Lack of good evidence on light rail, cycling, walking

Area-based policies

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide27

Enterprise Zones (economic ABIs) Just over 50% success rate for employment, wages Best design – US Empowerment Zones, which have a local employment requirement Where evalutions

test for displacement, they often find it Sports and culture, estate renewal Small / zero economic effects (except on house prices) But evidence of important social welfare / wellbeing gains

Area-based policies

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide28

Overall success rate = 50% Effect sizes aren’t always very large Perhaps not surprising when we think about what local economic growth policies are trying to do

Example: employment training programmes are often working with ‘hard to help’ clients Example: the majority of firms do not use state business advice programmes; they ask friends, family, colleagues and e.g. accountants for advice (CEEDR 2011)

What have we learned?

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide29

Success rates vary on key outcomes like employment Employment training and apprenticeships are better for raising employment.

Firm-focused programmes, not so much. But firm-focused policies can help raise innovation, sales & profits Why does this matter? Many policies have multiple objectives (e.g. ‘raising our game’). We need more clarity on what programmes want to achieve, and how

What have we learned?

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide30

Targeting matters. For example: broadband’s economic impacts are higher for SMEs; skilled workers; urban areas But not always.

Targeted business advice programmes do no better than generalist programmes Economic vs social rationales. Some programmes are pitched as economic wins, but actually deliver social wins (estate renewal, sports and culture). Broadband is an economic development tool – but isn’t it also a public utility?

What have we learned?

http://www.whatworksgrowth.org/policy-reviews/Slide31

Know more than we used to:

Relative effectiveness of different policiesEmployment training vs sports and cultureRelative effectiveness for different objectivesInnovation grants and loans (R&D or employment?)

Relative effectiveness for different areas

Broadband (urban or rural; services or manufacturing)

What determines effectiveness

In-work component of employment training

Selectiveness of area-based initiatives

But not as much as we’d like …

Do we know what works?Slide32

Toolkits: employment trainingSlide33

Toolkits: business adviceSlide34

Toolkits: Responding to Major Job LossesSlide35

Relative

effectiveness of different policiesRelative effectiveness for different objectivesRelative effectiveness for different

areas

What determines effectiveness

Reminders?

Mentors > Subsidised Consultancy > Public Support > Tailored Support?

Retraining > Outplacement

But not as much as we’d like …

Do we know what works?Slide36

Learning from local interventionsSlide37

Understanding evidence and embedding in policy design is difficult – especially when goes against strong prior beliefsThere are

large capacity and resource constraints, even in a country like the UK

Robust

policy development and evaluation

can be high risk / low

benefit, particularly

from a

local government

perspective

Centralisers

vs

localisers

Strong views not supported by evidence

No systematic pattern national/local effectiveness emerge

(

emp. training, business advice / finance)

Do we care what works?Slide38

Understanding evidence and embedding in policy design is difficult – especially when goes against strong prior beliefsThere are

large capacity and resource constraints, even in a country like the UK

Robust

policy development and evaluation

can be high risk / low

benefit, particularly

from a

local government

perspective

Centralisers

vs

localisers

Strong views not supported by evidence

No systematic pattern national/local effectiveness emerge

(

emp. training, business advice / finance)

Do we care what works?Slide39

So what works?Slide40

Make sure institutions are capable of deliveringRealism

about underlying market forces (‘context’)Invest in infrastructure in areas where likely to increase productivity and generate jobs

Make

sure people have the skills they need to access new jobs

To

improve outcomes for disadvantaged people, focus support on them don’t rely on ‘trickle-down

What works: The big pictureSlide41

Understanding evidence and embedding in policy design is difficult – especially when goes against strong prior beliefs

This is true for academics as well as policy makersThere are large capacity

and resource

constraints, even in a country like the UK

Robust

policy development and evaluation

can be high risk / low

benefit, particularly

from a

local government

perspective

Do we care what works?Slide42

Centralisers vs localisers

Strong views not supported by evidenceNo systematic pattern national/local effectiveness emerge

(

emp. training, business advice / finance

)

Overall policy effectiveness

Everything works, just spend more

Nothing works, don’t spend anything

Crucial questions?

What can we learn about policy cost-effectiveness?

What lessons generalise?

How do we embed lessons in to decision making?

The big questionsSlide43

What works: The detailed pictureSlide44

What Works Centre