/
Personal Data Sets Correlations Personal Data Sets Correlations

Personal Data Sets Correlations - PowerPoint Presentation

trish-goza
trish-goza . @trish-goza
Follow
373 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-15

Personal Data Sets Correlations - PPT Presentation

Michael Nethercutt 2017 Subjects Students at ECU Sex Spirituality Receptivity to PseudoProfound Bullshit http journalsjdmorg1515923ajdm15923apdf Bullshit Receptivity and Politics ID: 652434

sex work tailed correlations work sex correlations tailed statistics injury 168 reported 2015 sig bullshit 005 receptivity brown point test data spirit

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Personal Data Sets Correlations" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Personal Data Sets

CorrelationsSlide2

Michael Nethercutt, 2017

Subjects = Students at ECU

Sex

Spirituality

Receptivity to Pseudo-Profound Bullshit

http://

journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf

Bullshit Receptivity and PoliticsSlide3

Correlations

 

Sex

Spirit

PPBSSex1 = Male2 = FemalePearson Correlation1.168**.198**Sig. (2-tailed) .005.001N278277277SpiritualityPearson Correlation.168**1.545**Sig. (2-tailed).005 .000N277280278Slide4

Statistics

Sex

Spirit

PPBS

MaleVariance1.977.729Skewness.122.386Kurtosis-.989.074FemaleVariance1.792.776Skewness-.196-.181Kurtosis-.930-.223Slide5

Group Statistics

 

Sex

N

MeanStd. DeviationSpiritMale1203.24371.40623Female1573.71271.33870PPBSMale1212.5484.85359Female1562.9003.88070Slide6

Independent Samples Test

 

t-test for Equality of Means

t

dfSig. (2-tailed)Cohen’s dSpirituality 2.827275.005.34PPBS 3.343275.001.40Notice that the p values are identical to what they were for the point biserial correlations.Slide7

Jennifer

Hodgson, 2015

All participants reported experiencing a workplace

injury.

WORK STATUS (1 = in work; 2 = out of work).LOST TIME (number of days missed work since reported work-related injury)Slide8

From a Normal Population?

LostTime

Working

Mean

48.60Median5.00Variance20148.550Std. Deviation141.946Skewness5.705Kurtosis35.890NotMean138.71Median77.00Variance17995.096Std. Deviation134.146Skewness.524Kurtosis-1.408Slide9
Slide10

Erin Ezell, 2015

IntroQ

data set

Gender of Student (1 = female, 2 = male)

Eye Color (brown or not brown)Height of ideal mate (inches)Statophobia (11 point scale, 0 to 10)Slide11