Michael Nethercutt 2017 Subjects Students at ECU Sex Spirituality Receptivity to PseudoProfound Bullshit http journalsjdmorg1515923ajdm15923apdf Bullshit Receptivity and Politics ID: 652434
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Personal Data Sets Correlations" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Personal Data Sets
CorrelationsSlide2
Michael Nethercutt, 2017
Subjects = Students at ECU
Sex
Spirituality
Receptivity to Pseudo-Profound Bullshit
http://
journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf
Bullshit Receptivity and PoliticsSlide3
Correlations
Sex
Spirit
PPBSSex1 = Male2 = FemalePearson Correlation1.168**.198**Sig. (2-tailed) .005.001N278277277SpiritualityPearson Correlation.168**1.545**Sig. (2-tailed).005 .000N277280278Slide4
Statistics
Sex
Spirit
PPBS
MaleVariance1.977.729Skewness.122.386Kurtosis-.989.074FemaleVariance1.792.776Skewness-.196-.181Kurtosis-.930-.223Slide5
Group Statistics
Sex
N
MeanStd. DeviationSpiritMale1203.24371.40623Female1573.71271.33870PPBSMale1212.5484.85359Female1562.9003.88070Slide6
Independent Samples Test
t-test for Equality of Means
t
dfSig. (2-tailed)Cohen’s dSpirituality 2.827275.005.34PPBS 3.343275.001.40Notice that the p values are identical to what they were for the point biserial correlations.Slide7
Jennifer
Hodgson, 2015
All participants reported experiencing a workplace
injury.
WORK STATUS (1 = in work; 2 = out of work).LOST TIME (number of days missed work since reported work-related injury)Slide8
From a Normal Population?
LostTime
Working
Mean
48.60Median5.00Variance20148.550Std. Deviation141.946Skewness5.705Kurtosis35.890NotMean138.71Median77.00Variance17995.096Std. Deviation134.146Skewness.524Kurtosis-1.408Slide9Slide10
Erin Ezell, 2015
IntroQ
data set
Gender of Student (1 = female, 2 = male)
Eye Color (brown or not brown)Height of ideal mate (inches)Statophobia (11 point scale, 0 to 10)Slide11