/
Propositional Equivalences Propositional Equivalences

Propositional Equivalences - PowerPoint Presentation

trish-goza
trish-goza . @trish-goza
Follow
408 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-07

Propositional Equivalences - PPT Presentation

1 Tautologies Contradictions and Contingencies A tautology is a proposition that is always true Example p p A contradiction is a proposition that is always false ID: 276077

equivalent laws equivalence show laws equivalent show equivalence equivalences truth proofs negation tautology proposition law propositions implication tables logically solution compound logical

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Propositional Equivalences" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Propositional Equivalences

1Slide2

Tautologies, Contradictions, and Contingencies

A

tautology

is a proposition that is always

true.Example: p ∨¬p A contradiction is a proposition that is always false.Example: p ∧¬p A contingency is a compound proposition that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction

P

¬pp ∨¬p p ∧¬p TFTFFTTF

2Slide3

Equivalent Propositions

Two propositions are

equivalent

if they always have the same truth value.Formally: Two compound propositions p and q are logically equivalent if p↔q is a tautology.We write this as p≡q (or

p⇔

q)One way to determine equivalence is to use truth tablesExample: show that ¬p ∨q is equivalent to p → q.3Slide4

Equivalent Propositions

Example

: Show using truth tables that

that

implication is equivalent to its contrapositiveSolution:4Slide5

Show Non-Equivalence

Example

: Show using truth tables that neither the

converse

nor inverse of an implication are equivalent to the implication.Solution: pq

¬ p

¬ qp →q ¬ p →¬ qq → p TTFFTTTTFF

T

F

T

T

F

T

T

F

T

F

F

FFTTTTT

5Slide6

De Morgan’s Laws

p

q

¬

p

¬

q(p∨q)¬(p∨q)¬p∧¬qTTFFT

F

F

T

F

F

T

T

F

F

F

T

TFTFFFFT

TFT

T

Augustus De Morgan

1806-1871

6

Very useful in constructing proofs

This truth table shows that De Morgan’s Second Law holds

Slide7

Key Logical Equivalences

Identity Laws: ,

Domination Laws: ,

Idempotent laws: ,

Double Negation Law:Negation Laws: ,Slide8

Key Logical Equivalences (

cont)

Commutative Laws: ,

Associative Laws:

Distributive Laws:Absorption Laws:Slide9

More Logical Equivalences

9Slide10

Equivalence Proofs

Instead of using truth tables, we can show equivalence by developing a series of logically equivalent statements.

To prove that

A

≡B we produce a series of equivalences leading from A to B.Each step follows one of the established equivalences (laws)Each Ai can be an arbitrarily complex compound proposition.

10Slide11

Equivalence Proofs

Example

: Show that

is logically equivalent to

Solution:11

by the negation lawSlide12

Equivalence Proofs

Example

: Show that

is a tautology.

Solution:12by equivalence from Table 7

by the negation law

(¬q ∨ q)